The Organized Crime Chronicles (Bobby Capucci)

Thomas Morrisey, one of the top bundlers for the Kinahan cartel has been arrested in Spain after returning home from a trip to Turkey, where he was solidifying business dealings with other criminal groups, according to authorities. This is the latest big blow against the Kinahan cartel, and with somebody as connected to the leadership as Morrisey is, it's safe to say plenty of people are suffering from heartburn today.



(commercial at 8:48)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/kinahan-cartel-money-man-johnny-28012434

Authorities in California have made the biggest bust in state history earlier this month when they hit a Sinaloa Cartel stash house that was sitting on a mountain of fentanyl in pill form.

Opioids, Xanax and Adderall knockoffs were found amongst the drugs and all of it was headed to a community near you.

(commercial at 12:33)
to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/1-million-fentanyl-pills-linked-to-sinaloa-cartel-seized-in-record-breaking-drug-bust/ar-AAZBJXv?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=a3b40ee6b1944a7b84535fa17aaddaf7

In recent years, there have been numerous reports of disappearances in Mexico, with estimates varying widely. According to data available up until September 2021, the Mexican government's National Search Commission reported over 85,000 missing persons cases since 2006. However, these figures may not represent the full extent of the issue, as many cases go unreported or unacknowledged.

Various factors contribute to the high number of missing people in Mexico, including drug-related violence, human trafficking, organized crime activities, and political unrest. These cases often involve individuals from vulnerable populations, such as migrants, women, and children.Efforts to address this problem have been made by both government and non-governmental organizations, including the creation of specialized units and databases to track missing persons. However, challenges such as corruption, limited resources, and a lack of coordination have hindered progress in resolving these cases and providing closure to the families of the missing.

In this episode, we take a look at the desparation shown by the loved ones of the missing in Mexico as they are willing to even reach out to the cartels in an attempt to locate their loved ones remains so that they can give them a proper burial.

(commercial at 11:12)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@Protonmail.com


source:

Desperate mothers in Mexico negotiate with drug cartels in search of missing loved ones | International | EL PAÍS English (elpais.com)

As hostilities between the Caborca cartel and the Los Chapitos wing of the Sinaloa cartel continue to rage on, it's becoming more apparent that the Caborca cartel is not going to be intimidated or pushed out of their territory.


In this episode, we get another example of that as the newest clash between the two cartels has led to seven deaths as the battle rages on in Sonora.



(commecial at 8:43)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Caborca Cartel Fends Off Chapitos in Sonora, Mexico (insightcrime.org)

The Inspector general has finally, after almost four years of investigation, has released it's report about what happened to Jeffrey Epstein while in the custody of the federal government at MCC. According to the report, it was nothing more than systemic failures and guards who were incompetent in their duties.

Even after releasing his scathing report, nobody will face jail time for the errors included in the report and no sanctions will be leveled at any specific person and it leaves us wondering what, if anything, was accomplished by this three year investigation.



(commercial at 7:28)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DOJ issues scathing rebuke of Bureau of Prisons detailing multiple failures that led to Jeffrey Epstein's suicide | CNN Politics

As we have made our way through the OIG report there have been many points where I've had to stop and pause and ask myself "Is this real life?" considering how ridiculous some of the nonsense found within its pages has been. It would seem that I'm not the only who feels this way either...

Dr. Michael Baden has ripped the OIG report as incomplete at best and a white wash at worst and in this episode we take a look at what he had to say about the four year investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death.




(commercial at 8:40)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Forensic Pathologist Slams Dept. Of Justice Report on Jeffrey Epstein’s Death (radaronline.com)

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 12:29)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 9:57)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)

The dive into the OIG report into the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death continues in this episode as we pick up where we left off in the last one and finish off the report.




(commercial at 7:17)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 7:58)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 9:57)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 10:09)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 9:57)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 7:50)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The dive into the OIG report into the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death continues in this episode as we pick up where we left off in the last one.




(commercial at 11:54)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 9:17)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 9:10)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 9:57)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)

The dive into the OIG report into the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death continues in this episode as we pick up where we left off in the last one.




(commercial at 11:54)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 9:22)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The dive into the OIG report into the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death continues in this episode as we pick up where we left off in the last one.




(commercial at 11:54)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 9:24)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The dive into the OIG report into the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death continues in this episode as we pick up where we left off in the last one.




(commercial at 7:54)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 9:57)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 7:34)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 12:21)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)

The OIG report into Jeffrey Epstein's death was supposed to be the rubber stamp on the story that ended all doubt and mystery about what happened at the MCC leading up to and on the night of Epstein's death. However, it fails to answer many questions.


One of those questions? Why was the EMS report not included in the OIG report?



(commercial at 9:27)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


EMS Report In Jeffrey Epstein's Prison Death Remains Top Secret (radaronline.com)

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 7:49)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 12:08)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)

The Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG), one of Mexico's most powerful and dangerous criminal organizations, has taken control of the drug trade in Guadalajara and beyond through a combination of brazen violence, strategic alliances, and economic dominance.

CJNG, founded in 2009 after splintering from the Milenio Cartel, quickly rose to prominence by defeating rival factions and seizing control of smuggling networks. Their rapid expansion was marked by increased homicides, kidnappings, and mass graves in Jalisco. By 2018, CJNG operated over 100 methamphetamine labs in Mexico, generating billions in revenue from cocaine and methamphetamine trafficking.


The cartel's approach involves taxing local businesses and criminal enterprises, often at higher rates than their rivals, such as the Sinaloa Cartel. This taxation extends to legal markets, including the sale of tobacco, alcohol, and food. CJNG enforces its dominance through extreme violence and public displays of power, including attacks on police and community leaders​.

Internationally, CJNG has established significant trafficking routes from Mexico to the United States, Canada, and beyond. Their operations include maritime ports and high-capacity airplane terminals, facilitating the transportation of drugs to key cities in the U.S. and further afield.


CJNG's control in Guadalajara and other regions is maintained through a combination of fear-based tactics and strategic economic control, making them a formidable and deeply entrenched force in the global drug trade.

(commercial at 12:11)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

How Mexico's CJNG Controls Guadalajara’s Expanding Drug Market (insightcrime.org)

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 6:38)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released a report detailing significant failings in the supervision and custody of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, leading to his death by suicide on August 10, 2019. The investigation identified several critical errors and misconduct by MCC staff, including the failure to assign Epstein a cellmate despite prior suicide attempts, inadequate monitoring, falsified records of inmate checks, and a malfunctioning security camera system that did not record video in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) where Epstein was housed.


In this episode, we begin taking a look!

(commercial at 9:57)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:


2 3 - 0 8 5 (justice.gov)

Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman Loera filed a motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, arguing that his trial was compromised by juror misconduct. The motion cites a VICE News interview with an anonymous juror who claimed that jurors violated the judge’s instructions by following media coverage of the trial and discussing the case before deliberations. The juror revealed that several jurors had accessed news articles and tweets related to the trial on smart devices, and they discussed these articles among themselves despite the judge's explicit orders not to do so. The juror also admitted that jurors read about allegations of Guzman drugging and sexually abusing underage women, although they purportedly disregarded these claims during deliberations.

The defense argues that this misconduct resulted in an unfair trial, thus necessitating a new one. This claim focuses on the potential influence of external information on the jurors' impartiality and the possibility that pre-trial instructions were not adequately followed, thereby compromising the integrity of the trial.



(commercial at 8:54)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EL CHAPO: "MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL UPON AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING" - DocumentCloud

Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman Loera filed a motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, arguing that his trial was compromised by juror misconduct. The motion cites a VICE News interview with an anonymous juror who claimed that jurors violated the judge’s instructions by following media coverage of the trial and discussing the case before deliberations. The juror revealed that several jurors had accessed news articles and tweets related to the trial on smart devices, and they discussed these articles among themselves despite the judge's explicit orders not to do so. The juror also admitted that jurors read about allegations of Guzman drugging and sexually abusing underage women, although they purportedly disregarded these claims during deliberations.

The defense argues that this misconduct resulted in an unfair trial, thus necessitating a new one. This claim focuses on the potential influence of external information on the jurors' impartiality and the possibility that pre-trial instructions were not adequately followed, thereby compromising the integrity of the trial.



(commercial at 7:02)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EL CHAPO: "MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL UPON AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING" - DocumentCloud

Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman Loera filed a motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, arguing that his trial was compromised by juror misconduct. The motion cites a VICE News interview with an anonymous juror who claimed that jurors violated the judge’s instructions by following media coverage of the trial and discussing the case before deliberations. The juror revealed that several jurors had accessed news articles and tweets related to the trial on smart devices, and they discussed these articles among themselves despite the judge's explicit orders not to do so. The juror also admitted that jurors read about allegations of Guzman drugging and sexually abusing underage women, although they purportedly disregarded these claims during deliberations.

The defense argues that this misconduct resulted in an unfair trial, thus necessitating a new one. This claim focuses on the potential influence of external information on the jurors' impartiality and the possibility that pre-trial instructions were not adequately followed, thereby compromising the integrity of the trial.



(commercial at 5:58)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

EL CHAPO: "MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL UPON AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING" - DocumentCloud

The connections and ties between Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein are so obvious at this point that there is little doubt that the two of them were much closer than Clinton and his mouthpieces in the media would have us believe.


In this episode, we hear from another trafficked survivor of Epstein about how he flexed on her when they were aboard the 727 known as the Lolita Express about his great pal Bill Clinton and how Jane Doe 15 was sitting in BIll's favorite seat.


Meanwhile, the silence remains deafening in the vast majority of the legacy media about Bill Clinton and his long history with Jeffrey Epstein.

(commercial at 9:45)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Jeffrey Epstein accuser claims she took Bill Clinton's seat on his plane | Daily Mail Online

Ezequiel "Wicked" Romo, a notorious gang leader, regained control of his old gang, the Blythe Street gang in Panorama City, Los Angeles, after serving 18 years in prison. Upon his release, Romo sought to reassert his dominance and "clean house," which led to a string of violent incidents and murders. His return to leadership was marked by efforts to eliminate rivals and restore the gang's control over its territory and illicit activities.

Ezequiel "Wicked" Romo, a prominent figure in the Blythe Street gang, was found dead in July 2024. Romo, who had reclaimed leadership of the gang after his release from an 18-year prison sentence, had intensified gang violence in Panorama City, Los Angeles. His aggressive tactics and attempts to consolidate power led to a series of violent confrontations and murders within the gang and against rival factions..


Romo's murder was a significant event, given his notorious reputation and the chaos he had caused. His death has been linked to ongoing power struggles within the gang, as well as possible retribution from rival gangs or internal factions dissatisfied with his leadership. The precise details of his murder are still under investigation, but it has left a notable impact on the local community and law enforcement efforts to curb gang violence.



(commercial at 8:12)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Notorious Los Angeles drug lord Ezequiel 'Wicked' Romo, 47, is stabbed to death by three inmates while serving life for eight murders | Daily Mail Online

Sean "Diddy" Combs has long been rumored to have been involved in the murder of Tupac Shakur, with recent developments reigniting these allegations. A significant claim came from Duane "Keffe D" Davis, who alleged that Diddy offered him $1 million to kill Tupac and Death Row Records CEO Suge Knight. This claim was made during a proffer agreement with authorities, under which Keffe D confessed that the directive to kill Tupac came from Diddy himself.


The allegations have gained further traction with the arrest of Keffe D in 2023 for his role in the 1996 murder. Investigations have revealed that a million-dollar check, allegedly linked to Blackground Records, might have been used to finance the hit on Tupac. Gene Deal, a former associate of Diddy, suggested that this financial transaction is central to the renewed investigation​.


Despite these allegations, Diddy has consistently denied any involvement in Tupac's murder. He described the claims as "pure fiction" and has actively sought to clear his name, even reaching out to Tupac's family to assert his innocence​.


Let's dive in!


(commercial at 8:26)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Diddy is named 77 times in Tupac Shakur murder documents after gangster Duane 'Keefe D' Davis accused him of paying $1million for the hit | Daily Mail Online

There are plenty of legit questions that surround what happened to Jeffrey Epstein while he was in custody in Manhattan and one of the favored techniques of the gate keepers of truth in the fourth estate, is to parrot, word for word what the DOJ and The IG reports tell us. The only problem with that is, there plenty of holes within those reports.


In this episode, Jeffrey Epstein's brother Mark is speaking out in the wake of the new document dump that is underway and according to him, the government has been less than helpful when it comes to information about his brothers death, and why he thinks that there is much more to the story.

(commercial at 9:31)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Jeffrey Epstein's brother claims feds covering up death evidence (nypost.com)

Ghislaine Maxwell has brought in Harvey Weinstein's lawyer to try and help win her freedom. However, there is quite the hill for him to climb considering the chargers Maxwell was convicted of and the nature of the crimes she was involved in.

Her new legal team has signaled that they are not going to argue her guilt or innocence (that would be a short arguement) but instead focus on her treatement by the federal government and the fact that she didn't get a fair (according to them) trial.


Let's dive in and see what's up!


(commercial at 7:05)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Ghislaine Maxwell hiring Harvey Weinstein's lawyer in appeal (pagesix.com)

With Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal right around the corner, her lawyer, Arthur Aidala is wasting no time to make the rounds to crow about his clients innocence. This time around he was on the Andrew Cuomo show on the obscure News Nation network, telling Cuomo that Maxwell is innocent and how she has some opinions about Epstein's death, but, of course, he can't share those opinions until after her appeal.


In otherwords, they have nothing new to offer us.


So, let's dive in and swim through the latest bs to find some clarity.

(commercial at 9:06)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney says she 'definitely has a take' on Epstein suicide conspiracies but won't say what it is - and claims she didn't testify at her trial because she was 'hungry and sleep-deprived' | Daily Mail Online

Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, a co-founder and leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has been indicted on charges of manufacturing and distributing fentanyl, with the intent of smuggling it into the United States. This indictment, filed by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York, is the latest in a series of charges against him, which also include running a continuing criminal enterprise, murder conspiracy, money laundering, and trafficking in cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine.

Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, a key leader of Mexico's Sinaloa Cartel, was recently arrested in El Paso, Texas, on July 26, 2024. This arrest marks a significant blow to the cartel, as Zambada has been a central figure in the organization's operations for decades. Alongside Zambada, Joaquin Guzman Lopez, the son of the cartel's co-founder Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, was also taken into custody. Both arrests were part of an extensive operation by the U.S. Department of Justice aimed at dismantling the cartel's leadership.

Zambada has been charged in multiple indictments over the years, including those for running a continuing criminal enterprise, conspiracy to commit murder, money laundering, and drug trafficking, including the distribution of fentanyl. The latest indictment extended the charges to cover activities up to January 2024, demonstrating his ongoing involvement in cartel operations despite previous efforts to apprehend him.

Authorities assert that Zambada's arrest or death could potentially trigger violent power struggles within the cartel, particularly between factions loyal to him and those loyal to Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzmán’s sons


In this episode we dive into the shocking news.


(commercial at 7:58)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Sinaloa Cartel co-founder ‘El Mayo’ taken into US custody | Fox News

Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, a co-founder and leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has been indicted on charges of manufacturing and distributing fentanyl, with the intent of smuggling it into the United States. This indictment, filed by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York, is the latest in a series of charges against him, which also include running a continuing criminal enterprise, murder conspiracy, money laundering, and trafficking in cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine.

Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, a key leader of Mexico's Sinaloa Cartel, was recently arrested in El Paso, Texas, on July 26, 2024. This arrest marks a significant blow to the cartel, as Zambada has been a central figure in the organization's operations for decades. Alongside Zambada, Joaquin Guzman Lopez, the son of the cartel's co-founder Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, was also taken into custody. Both arrests were part of an extensive operation by the U.S. Department of Justice aimed at dismantling the cartel's leadership.

Zambada has been charged in multiple indictments over the years, including those for running a continuing criminal enterprise, conspiracy to commit murder, money laundering, and drug trafficking, including the distribution of fentanyl. The latest indictment extended the charges to cover activities up to January 2024, demonstrating his ongoing involvement in cartel operations despite previous efforts to apprehend him.

Authorities assert that Zambada's arrest or death could potentially trigger violent power struggles within the cartel, particularly between factions loyal to him and those loyal to Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzmán’s sons


Consider this:

The rivalry between Los Chapitos and the Mayitos within the Sinaloa Cartel has intensified due to their differing leadership styles and territorial ambitions.

Los Chapitos, comprised of Iván Archibaldo Guzmán Salazar, Jesús Alfredo Guzmán Salazar, Ovidio Guzmán López, and Joaquín Guzmán López, are the sons of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán. They are known for their violent and aggressive tactics, and they have expanded their operations significantly, including moving large quantities of cocaine and producing fentanyl in clandestine labs​.

Los Mayitos, on the other hand, are the sons of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, El Chapo's long-time partner. El Mayo has groomed his sons, particularly Ismael Zambada Imperial (El Mayito Gordo) and Ismael Zambada Sicairos (El Mayito Flaco), to take over his operations. Unlike Los Chapitos, the Mayitos are seen as more strategic and business-oriented, having received formal educations and training in drug trafficking over the years​.

This rivalry stems from both groups' desire to control the lucrative drug trade and maintain their dominance within the cartel. The Chapitos are noted for their brutal enforcement tactics, while the Mayitos rely on their established networks and business acumen. This internal conflict has led to increased violence and instability within the Sinaloa Cartel as each faction vies for power and control​.

Now, with the shocking arrest of El Mayo and the circumstances surrounding that death, the situation is set to explode.  

(commercial at 10:41)

to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

El Chapo's son Joaquín Lopez flips for the FBI and tricks Sinaloa Cartel co-founder Ismael 'El Mayo' Zambada into boarding plane to US after 'blaming him for the capture of his father' - as both Mexican drug lords are arrested in Texas | Daily Mail Online

A reply brief in the context of a defendant appealing their sentence is a legal document filed by the defendant's attorney in response to the brief filed by the prosecution or the government. In this brief, the defendant's attorney addresses any arguments or points raised by the prosecution in their brief and presents counterarguments, clarifications, or additional legal precedents supporting the defendant's appeal.The reply brief typically follows a structured format, including:

1. Introduction: This section introduces the purpose of the reply brief and provides a brief overview of the arguments presented in response to the prosecution's brief.
2. Statement of the Case: A summary of the relevant facts and procedural history of the case to provide context for the arguments presented.
3. Argument: This section is the main body of the reply brief, where the defendant's attorney addresses each issue raised by the prosecution in their brief. They may refute the prosecution's arguments, present additional legal authorities or case law supporting the defendant's position, and highlight any errors or inconsistencies in the prosecution's arguments.
4. Conclusion: A summary of the key points made in the reply brief and a reaffirmation of the defendant's request for relief, such as a reduction in sentence or overturning of the conviction.

In this episode, we take a look at Ghislaine Maxwell and her lawyer Arthur Aidala make their case for an appeal.

(commercial at 7:58)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.ca2.57831.87.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

When the government files a brief in response to a defendant's appeal, its function is to present arguments and legal reasoning supporting the lower court's decision and opposing the defendant's arguments for overturning that decision. This brief serves to defend the conviction or ruling made against the defendant in the lower court.

Typically, the government's brief will address the legal issues raised by the defendant on appeal, analyze relevant case law, statutes, and constitutional principles, and argue why the lower court's decision should be upheld. It may also address any procedural or evidentiary issues raised by the defendant.


In essence, the government's brief is a key component of the appellate process, where both sides present their arguments to the appellate court, which will ultimately decide whether to affirm, reverse, or modify the lower court's decision.


In this episode, we begin our look at the United States Governments brief in response to Ghislaine Maxwell's attempt at appealing her sentence.

(commercial at 8:52)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.ca2.57831.79.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A reply brief in the context of a defendant appealing their sentence is a legal document filed by the defendant's attorney in response to the brief filed by the prosecution or the government. In this brief, the defendant's attorney addresses any arguments or points raised by the prosecution in their brief and presents counterarguments, clarifications, or additional legal precedents supporting the defendant's appeal.The reply brief typically follows a structured format, including:

1. Introduction: This section introduces the purpose of the reply brief and provides a brief overview of the arguments presented in response to the prosecution's brief.
2. Statement of the Case: A summary of the relevant facts and procedural history of the case to provide context for the arguments presented.
3. Argument: This section is the main body of the reply brief, where the defendant's attorney addresses each issue raised by the prosecution in their brief. They may refute the prosecution's arguments, present additional legal authorities or case law supporting the defendant's position, and highlight any errors or inconsistencies in the prosecution's arguments.
4. Conclusion: A summary of the key points made in the reply brief and a reaffirmation of the defendant's request for relief, such as a reduction in sentence or overturning of the conviction.

In this episode, we take a look at Ghislaine Maxwell and her lawyer Arthur Aidala make their case for an appeal.

(commercial at 7:46)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.ca2.57831.87.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A reply brief in the context of a defendant appealing their sentence is a legal document filed by the defendant's attorney in response to the brief filed by the prosecution or the government. In this brief, the defendant's attorney addresses any arguments or points raised by the prosecution in their brief and presents counterarguments, clarifications, or additional legal precedents supporting the defendant's appeal.The reply brief typically follows a structured format, including:

1. Introduction: This section introduces the purpose of the reply brief and provides a brief overview of the arguments presented in response to the prosecution's brief.
2. Statement of the Case: A summary of the relevant facts and procedural history of the case to provide context for the arguments presented.
3. Argument: This section is the main body of the reply brief, where the defendant's attorney addresses each issue raised by the prosecution in their brief. They may refute the prosecution's arguments, present additional legal authorities or case law supporting the defendant's position, and highlight any errors or inconsistencies in the prosecution's arguments.
4. Conclusion: A summary of the key points made in the reply brief and a reaffirmation of the defendant's request for relief, such as a reduction in sentence or overturning of the conviction.

In this episode, we take a look at Ghislaine Maxwell and her lawyer Arthur Aidala make their case for an appeal.

(commercial at 8:10)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.ca2.57831.87.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

When the government files a brief in response to a defendant's appeal, its function is to present arguments and legal reasoning supporting the lower court's decision and opposing the defendant's arguments for overturning that decision. This brief serves to defend the conviction or ruling made against the defendant in the lower court.

Typically, the government's brief will address the legal issues raised by the defendant on appeal, analyze relevant case law, statutes, and constitutional principles, and argue why the lower court's decision should be upheld. It may also address any procedural or evidentiary issues raised by the defendant.


In essence, the government's brief is a key component of the appellate process, where both sides present their arguments to the appellate court, which will ultimately decide whether to affirm, reverse, or modify the lower court's decision.


In this episode, we begin our look at the United States Governments brief in response to Ghislaine Maxwell's attempt at appealing her sentence.

(commercial at 8:18)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.ca2.57831.79.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

When the government files a brief in response to a defendant's appeal, its function is to present arguments and legal reasoning supporting the lower court's decision and opposing the defendant's arguments for overturning that decision. This brief serves to defend the conviction or ruling made against the defendant in the lower court.

Typically, the government's brief will address the legal issues raised by the defendant on appeal, analyze relevant case law, statutes, and constitutional principles, and argue why the lower court's decision should be upheld. It may also address any procedural or evidentiary issues raised by the defendant.


In essence, the government's brief is a key component of the appellate process, where both sides present their arguments to the appellate court, which will ultimately decide whether to affirm, reverse, or modify the lower court's decision.


In this episode, we begin our look at the United States Governments brief in response to Ghislaine Maxwell's attempt at appealing her sentence.

(commercial at 7:21)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.ca2.57831.79.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

When the government files a brief in response to a defendant's appeal, its function is to present arguments and legal reasoning supporting the lower court's decision and opposing the defendant's arguments for overturning that decision. This brief serves to defend the conviction or ruling made against the defendant in the lower court.

Typically, the government's brief will address the legal issues raised by the defendant on appeal, analyze relevant case law, statutes, and constitutional principles, and argue why the lower court's decision should be upheld. It may also address any procedural or evidentiary issues raised by the defendant.


In essence, the government's brief is a key component of the appellate process, where both sides present their arguments to the appellate court, which will ultimately decide whether to affirm, reverse, or modify the lower court's decision.


In this episode, we begin our look at the United States Governments brief in response to Ghislaine Maxwell's attempt at appealing her sentence.

(commercial at 10:31)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.ca2.57831.79.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

When the government files a brief in response to a defendant's appeal, its function is to present arguments and legal reasoning supporting the lower court's decision and opposing the defendant's arguments for overturning that decision. This brief serves to defend the conviction or ruling made against the defendant in the lower court.

Typically, the government's brief will address the legal issues raised by the defendant on appeal, analyze relevant case law, statutes, and constitutional principles, and argue why the lower court's decision should be upheld. It may also address any procedural or evidentiary issues raised by the defendant.


In essence, the government's brief is a key component of the appellate process, where both sides present their arguments to the appellate court, which will ultimately decide whether to affirm, reverse, or modify the lower court's decision.


In this episode, we begin our look at the United States Governments brief in response to Ghislaine Maxwell's attempt at appealing her sentence.

(commercial at 10:29)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.ca2.57831.79.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

When the government files a brief in response to a defendant's appeal, its function is to present arguments and legal reasoning supporting the lower court's decision and opposing the defendant's arguments for overturning that decision. This brief serves to defend the conviction or ruling made against the defendant in the lower court.

Typically, the government's brief will address the legal issues raised by the defendant on appeal, analyze relevant case law, statutes, and constitutional principles, and argue why the lower court's decision should be upheld. It may also address any procedural or evidentiary issues raised by the defendant.


In essence, the government's brief is a key component of the appellate process, where both sides present their arguments to the appellate court, which will ultimately decide whether to affirm, reverse, or modify the lower court's decision.


In this episode, we begin our look at the United States Governments brief in response to Ghislaine Maxwell's attempt at appealing her sentence.

(commercial at 8:18)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.ca2.57831.79.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

When the government files a brief in response to a defendant's appeal, its function is to present arguments and legal reasoning supporting the lower court's decision and opposing the defendant's arguments for overturning that decision. This brief serves to defend the conviction or ruling made against the defendant in the lower court.

Typically, the government's brief will address the legal issues raised by the defendant on appeal, analyze relevant case law, statutes, and constitutional principles, and argue why the lower court's decision should be upheld. It may also address any procedural or evidentiary issues raised by the defendant.


In essence, the government's brief is a key component of the appellate process, where both sides present their arguments to the appellate court, which will ultimately decide whether to affirm, reverse, or modify the lower court's decision.


In this episode, we begin our look at the United States Governments brief in response to Ghislaine Maxwell's attempt at appealing her sentence.

(commercial at 8:15)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.ca2.57831.79.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

When the government files a brief in response to a defendant's appeal, its function is to present arguments and legal reasoning supporting the lower court's decision and opposing the defendant's arguments for overturning that decision. This brief serves to defend the conviction or ruling made against the defendant in the lower court.

Typically, the government's brief will address the legal issues raised by the defendant on appeal, analyze relevant case law, statutes, and constitutional principles, and argue why the lower court's decision should be upheld. It may also address any procedural or evidentiary issues raised by the defendant.


In essence, the government's brief is a key component of the appellate process, where both sides present their arguments to the appellate court, which will ultimately decide whether to affirm, reverse, or modify the lower court's decision.


In this episode, we begin our look at the United States Governments brief in response to Ghislaine Maxwell's attempt at appealing her sentence.

(commercial at 7:41)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.ca2.57831.79.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

When the government files a brief in response to a defendant's appeal, its function is to present arguments and legal reasoning supporting the lower court's decision and opposing the defendant's arguments for overturning that decision. This brief serves to defend the conviction or ruling made against the defendant in the lower court.

Typically, the government's brief will address the legal issues raised by the defendant on appeal, analyze relevant case law, statutes, and constitutional principles, and argue why the lower court's decision should be upheld. It may also address any procedural or evidentiary issues raised by the defendant.


In essence, the government's brief is a key component of the appellate process, where both sides present their arguments to the appellate court, which will ultimately decide whether to affirm, reverse, or modify the lower court's decision.


In this episode, we finish off our look at the United States Governments brief in response to Ghislaine Maxwell's attempt at appealing her sentence.

(commercial at 8:52)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.ca2.57831.79.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A reply brief in the context of a defendant appealing their sentence is a legal document filed by the defendant's attorney in response to the brief filed by the prosecution or the government. In this brief, the defendant's attorney addresses any arguments or points raised by the prosecution in their brief and presents counterarguments, clarifications, or additional legal precedents supporting the defendant's appeal.The reply brief typically follows a structured format, including:

1. Introduction: This section introduces the purpose of the reply brief and provides a brief overview of the arguments presented in response to the prosecution's brief.
2. Statement of the Case: A summary of the relevant facts and procedural history of the case to provide context for the arguments presented.
3. Argument: This section is the main body of the reply brief, where the defendant's attorney addresses each issue raised by the prosecution in their brief. They may refute the prosecution's arguments, present additional legal authorities or case law supporting the defendant's position, and highlight any errors or inconsistencies in the prosecution's arguments.
4. Conclusion: A summary of the key points made in the reply brief and a reaffirmation of the defendant's request for relief, such as a reduction in sentence or overturning of the conviction.

In this episode, we take a look at Ghislaine Maxwell and her lawyer Arthur Aidala make their case for an appeal.

(commercial at 7:46)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.ca2.57831.87.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

When the government files a brief in response to a defendant's appeal, its function is to present arguments and legal reasoning supporting the lower court's decision and opposing the defendant's arguments for overturning that decision. This brief serves to defend the conviction or ruling made against the defendant in the lower court.

Typically, the government's brief will address the legal issues raised by the defendant on appeal, analyze relevant case law, statutes, and constitutional principles, and argue why the lower court's decision should be upheld. It may also address any procedural or evidentiary issues raised by the defendant.


In essence, the government's brief is a key component of the appellate process, where both sides present their arguments to the appellate court, which will ultimately decide whether to affirm, reverse, or modify the lower court's decision.


In this episode, we begin our look at the United States Governments brief in response to Ghislaine Maxwell's attempt at appealing her sentence.

(commercial at 8:00)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.ca2.57831.79.0_1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

The arrest of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, a prominent leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, has highlighted significant issues within Mexican law enforcement and its coordination with U.S. agencies. Zambada was apprehended in El Paso, Texas, on July 25, 2024. This operation, reportedly carried out by the FBI, caught the Mexican government by surprise, as they were unaware of the operation until after the fact​.


The arrest has major implications for both U.S. and Mexican anti-drug operations. Zambada has been a key figure in the Sinaloa Cartel, and his capture marks a significant blow to the cartel's operations. However, the lack of communication between U.S. and Mexican authorities raises concerns about the effectiveness of bilateral cooperation in combating drug trafficking and organized crime.


The arrest of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada is expected to escalate violence both within the Sinaloa Cartel and from external sources such as the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG). Internally, the Sinaloa Cartel faces potential leadership disputes among factions, particularly between "Los Chapitos" (the sons of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán) and loyalists to El Mayo. This power vacuum could lead to violent infighting as different groups vie for control of the cartel's extensive operations.






Externally, the CJNG, led by Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes ("El Mencho"), sees this as an opportunity to expand its influence and challenge the Sinaloa Cartel's dominance. The CJNG has already been in a violent turf war with the Sinaloa Cartel, particularly in regions like Zacatecas, Jalisco, and Puerto Vallarta. El Mayo's arrest could intensify these conflicts as CJNG attempts to exploit any perceived weaknesses within the Sinaloa Cartel to gain territorial control​.



(commercial at 10:01)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

'El Mayo' pleads not guilty in federal court in El Paso (borderreport.com)

Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada is a prominent figure within the world of Mexican drug trafficking, particularly associated with the Sinaloa Cartel, one of the most powerful drug trafficking organizations in the world. Here's a comprehensive summary of his background and significance:Background:

1. Early Life: Ismael Zambada García was born on January 1, 1948, in El Álamo, Sinaloa, Mexico. He grew up in a rural area and became involved in the drug trade at a young age.
2. Rise in the Drug Trade: Zambada began his career in the drug trade working under Miguel Ángel Félix Gallardo, one of the founding members of the Guadalajara Cartel. After Gallardo's arrest, Zambada aligned himself with Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, forming a powerful partnership that would dominate the Mexican drug trade for decades.
3. Sinaloa Cartel Leadership: Zambada is often referred to as the "head" or "co-leader" of the Sinaloa Cartel alongside El Chapo. While Guzmán garnered much of the attention and notoriety, Zambada operated more discreetly, preferring to work behind the scenes.
4. Modus Operandi: Zambada is known for his strategic and business-oriented approach to drug trafficking. He has been involved in all aspects of the trade, including production, transportation, and distribution, and is reputed for his ability to maintain alliances and resolve conflicts within the cartel.

Quotes:

1. On His Legacy: Zambada once stated, "I’m a humble rancher. I don’t consider myself a narco. I’m a businessman dedicated to agriculture. Drug trafficking is a business and we are businessmen. Nothing more, nothing less."
2. On El Chapo: In an interview with journalist Julio Scherer García, Zambada described his relationship with El Chapo as one of mutual respect and cooperation: "Chapo and I had an agreement. He was in charge of the mountains, and I took care of the coasts."
3. On His Approach to Business: Zambada has emphasized the importance of maintaining a low profile and avoiding unnecessary violence. He once remarked, "The best thing is to negotiate, not to kill."

Significance:

1. Continued Influence: Despite the arrest and subsequent extradition of El Chapo to the United States, Zambada remains a key figure within the Sinaloa Cartel and the broader landscape of Mexican drug trafficking. His leadership ensures the cartel's continued operations and adaptability.
2. Control of Territories: Zambada's influence extends beyond the drug trade, as he also exerts control over vast territories in Sinaloa and other parts of Mexico, often through a combination of coercion, bribery, and alliances with local authorities.
3. International Reach: Under Zambada's leadership, the Sinaloa Cartel has expanded its reach globally, smuggling drugs into the United States, Europe, and other regions. This international presence has made Zambada and the cartel significant players in the global drug trade.

In this episode we take a look at the indictment of the real leader of the Sinaloa cartel, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada.


(commercial at 10:31)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@Protonmail.com



source:

Eastern District of New York | Co-Founder of Sinaloa Cartel Charged in Superseding Indictment with Conspiracy to Manufacture and Distribute Fentanyl | United States Department of Justice

Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada is a prominent figure within the world of Mexican drug trafficking, particularly associated with the Sinaloa Cartel, one of the most powerful drug trafficking organizations in the world. Here's a comprehensive summary of his background and significance:Background:

1. Early Life: Ismael Zambada García was born on January 1, 1948, in El Álamo, Sinaloa, Mexico. He grew up in a rural area and became involved in the drug trade at a young age.
2. Rise in the Drug Trade: Zambada began his career in the drug trade working under Miguel Ángel Félix Gallardo, one of the founding members of the Guadalajara Cartel. After Gallardo's arrest, Zambada aligned himself with Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, forming a powerful partnership that would dominate the Mexican drug trade for decades.
3. Sinaloa Cartel Leadership: Zambada is often referred to as the "head" or "co-leader" of the Sinaloa Cartel alongside El Chapo. While Guzmán garnered much of the attention and notoriety, Zambada operated more discreetly, preferring to work behind the scenes.
4. Modus Operandi: Zambada is known for his strategic and business-oriented approach to drug trafficking. He has been involved in all aspects of the trade, including production, transportation, and distribution, and is reputed for his ability to maintain alliances and resolve conflicts within the cartel.

Quotes:

1. On His Legacy: Zambada once stated, "I’m a humble rancher. I don’t consider myself a narco. I’m a businessman dedicated to agriculture. Drug trafficking is a business and we are businessmen. Nothing more, nothing less."
2. On El Chapo: In an interview with journalist Julio Scherer García, Zambada described his relationship with El Chapo as one of mutual respect and cooperation: "Chapo and I had an agreement. He was in charge of the mountains, and I took care of the coasts."
3. On His Approach to Business: Zambada has emphasized the importance of maintaining a low profile and avoiding unnecessary violence. He once remarked, "The best thing is to negotiate, not to kill."

Significance:

1. Continued Influence: Despite the arrest and subsequent extradition of El Chapo to the United States, Zambada remains a key figure within the Sinaloa Cartel and the broader landscape of Mexican drug trafficking. His leadership ensures the cartel's continued operations and adaptability.
2. Control of Territories: Zambada's influence extends beyond the drug trade, as he also exerts control over vast territories in Sinaloa and other parts of Mexico, often through a combination of coercion, bribery, and alliances with local authorities.
3. International Reach: Under Zambada's leadership, the Sinaloa Cartel has expanded its reach globally, smuggling drugs into the United States, Europe, and other regions. This international presence has made Zambada and the cartel significant players in the global drug trade.

In this episode we take a look at the indictment of the real leader of the Sinaloa cartel, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada.


(commercial at 8:13)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@Protonmail.com



source:

Eastern District of New York | Co-Founder of Sinaloa Cartel Charged in Superseding Indictment with Conspiracy to Manufacture and Distribute Fentanyl | United States Department of Justice

Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada is a prominent figure within the world of Mexican drug trafficking, particularly associated with the Sinaloa Cartel, one of the most powerful drug trafficking organizations in the world. Here's a comprehensive summary of his background and significance:Background:

1. Early Life: Ismael Zambada García was born on January 1, 1948, in El Álamo, Sinaloa, Mexico. He grew up in a rural area and became involved in the drug trade at a young age.
2. Rise in the Drug Trade: Zambada began his career in the drug trade working under Miguel Ángel Félix Gallardo, one of the founding members of the Guadalajara Cartel. After Gallardo's arrest, Zambada aligned himself with Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, forming a powerful partnership that would dominate the Mexican drug trade for decades.
3. Sinaloa Cartel Leadership: Zambada is often referred to as the "head" or "co-leader" of the Sinaloa Cartel alongside El Chapo. While Guzmán garnered much of the attention and notoriety, Zambada operated more discreetly, preferring to work behind the scenes.
4. Modus Operandi: Zambada is known for his strategic and business-oriented approach to drug trafficking. He has been involved in all aspects of the trade, including production, transportation, and distribution, and is reputed for his ability to maintain alliances and resolve conflicts within the cartel.

Quotes:

1. On His Legacy: Zambada once stated, "I’m a humble rancher. I don’t consider myself a narco. I’m a businessman dedicated to agriculture. Drug trafficking is a business and we are businessmen. Nothing more, nothing less."
2. On El Chapo: In an interview with journalist Julio Scherer García, Zambada described his relationship with El Chapo as one of mutual respect and cooperation: "Chapo and I had an agreement. He was in charge of the mountains, and I took care of the coasts."
3. On His Approach to Business: Zambada has emphasized the importance of maintaining a low profile and avoiding unnecessary violence. He once remarked, "The best thing is to negotiate, not to kill."

Significance:

1. Continued Influence: Despite the arrest and subsequent extradition of El Chapo to the United States, Zambada remains a key figure within the Sinaloa Cartel and the broader landscape of Mexican drug trafficking. His leadership ensures the cartel's continued operations and adaptability.
2. Control of Territories: Zambada's influence extends beyond the drug trade, as he also exerts control over vast territories in Sinaloa and other parts of Mexico, often through a combination of coercion, bribery, and alliances with local authorities.
3. International Reach: Under Zambada's leadership, the Sinaloa Cartel has expanded its reach globally, smuggling drugs into the United States, Europe, and other regions. This international presence has made Zambada and the cartel significant players in the global drug trade.

In this episode we take a look at the indictment of the real leader of the Sinaloa cartel, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada.


(commercial at 8:03)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@Protonmail.com



source:

Eastern District of New York | Co-Founder of Sinaloa Cartel Charged in Superseding Indictment with Conspiracy to Manufacture and Distribute Fentanyl | United States Department of Justice

Vicente Zambada Niebla, also known as "El Vicentillo," is a prominent figure in Mexican organized crime, specifically associated with the Sinaloa Cartel. Born on February 14, 1975, in Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico, he is the son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, one of the top leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel. Vicente Zambada rose through the ranks within the cartel and became one of its key operatives.

Zambada was implicated in various drug trafficking activities, including coordinating the transportation and distribution of narcotics, primarily cocaine and marijuana, into the United States. His role within the cartel involved managing logistics, negotiating with other criminal organizations, and overseeing drug shipments.

In February 2009, Vicente Zambada was arrested by Mexican authorities in Mexico City. His arrest was a significant blow to the Sinaloa Cartel, as he was considered one of its highest-ranking members at the time. Zambada's capture highlighted the ongoing efforts by law enforcement to dismantle the cartel's leadership structure.

During his trial in the United States, Zambada provided extensive testimony against other members of the Sinaloa Cartel, including his own father, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, as well as Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, the infamous former leader of the cartel. His cooperation with U.S. authorities led to the conviction of numerous cartel members and provided valuable insights into the inner workings of the organization.

Throughout the trial, Zambada's testimony shed light on the violence, corruption, and vast network of drug trafficking that characterized the Sinaloa Cartel's operations. His insights were crucial in building cases against other cartel leaders and dismantling key aspects of their criminal enterprise.

One notable quote from Vicente Zambada during his trial emphasized the pervasive influence of the cartel: "The organization has more power than the government because the government itself is corrupt." This statement underscores the extent to which organized crime has infiltrated various institutions in Mexico.

In October 2019, Vicente Zambada was sentenced to 15 years in prison by a U.S. federal court for his involvement in drug trafficking. Despite his cooperation with authorities, Zambada still faced significant legal consequences for his criminal activities.

Then in 2023, that cooperation with the United States Government came to an end after a visit from a known Sinaloan sponsored lawyer.


In this episode, we begin our exploration of the case brought by the United States of America against Vicente Zambada and what has transpired since.

(commercial at 9:43)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


show_temp-3.pl-1.pdf (wired.com)

Vicente Zambada Niebla, also known as "El Vicentillo," is a prominent figure in Mexican organized crime, specifically associated with the Sinaloa Cartel. Born on February 14, 1975, in Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico, he is the son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, one of the top leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel. Vicente Zambada rose through the ranks within the cartel and became one of its key operatives.

Zambada was implicated in various drug trafficking activities, including coordinating the transportation and distribution of narcotics, primarily cocaine and marijuana, into the United States. His role within the cartel involved managing logistics, negotiating with other criminal organizations, and overseeing drug shipments.

In February 2009, Vicente Zambada was arrested by Mexican authorities in Mexico City. His arrest was a significant blow to the Sinaloa Cartel, as he was considered one of its highest-ranking members at the time. Zambada's capture highlighted the ongoing efforts by law enforcement to dismantle the cartel's leadership structure.

During his trial in the United States, Zambada provided extensive testimony against other members of the Sinaloa Cartel, including his own father, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, as well as Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, the infamous former leader of the cartel. His cooperation with U.S. authorities led to the conviction of numerous cartel members and provided valuable insights into the inner workings of the organization.

Throughout the trial, Zambada's testimony shed light on the violence, corruption, and vast network of drug trafficking that characterized the Sinaloa Cartel's operations. His insights were crucial in building cases against other cartel leaders and dismantling key aspects of their criminal enterprise.

One notable quote from Vicente Zambada during his trial emphasized the pervasive influence of the cartel: "The organization has more power than the government because the government itself is corrupt." This statement underscores the extent to which organized crime has infiltrated various institutions in Mexico.

In October 2019, Vicente Zambada was sentenced to 15 years in prison by a U.S. federal court for his involvement in drug trafficking. Despite his cooperation with authorities, Zambada still faced significant legal consequences for his criminal activities.

Then in 2023, that cooperation with the United States Government came to an end after a visit from a known Sinaloan sponsored lawyer.


In this episode, we begin our exploration of the case brought by the United States of America against Vicente Zambada and what has transpired since.

(commercial at 7:58)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


show_temp-3.pl-1.pdf (wired.com)

Vicente Zambada Niebla, also known as "El Vicentillo," is a prominent figure in Mexican organized crime, specifically associated with the Sinaloa Cartel. Born on February 14, 1975, in Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico, he is the son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, one of the top leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel. Vicente Zambada rose through the ranks within the cartel and became one of its key operatives.

Zambada was implicated in various drug trafficking activities, including coordinating the transportation and distribution of narcotics, primarily cocaine and marijuana, into the United States. His role within the cartel involved managing logistics, negotiating with other criminal organizations, and overseeing drug shipments.

In February 2009, Vicente Zambada was arrested by Mexican authorities in Mexico City. His arrest was a significant blow to the Sinaloa Cartel, as he was considered one of its highest-ranking members at the time. Zambada's capture highlighted the ongoing efforts by law enforcement to dismantle the cartel's leadership structure.

During his trial in the United States, Zambada provided extensive testimony against other members of the Sinaloa Cartel, including his own father, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, as well as Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, the infamous former leader of the cartel. His cooperation with U.S. authorities led to the conviction of numerous cartel members and provided valuable insights into the inner workings of the organization.

Throughout the trial, Zambada's testimony shed light on the violence, corruption, and vast network of drug trafficking that characterized the Sinaloa Cartel's operations. His insights were crucial in building cases against other cartel leaders and dismantling key aspects of their criminal enterprise.

One notable quote from Vicente Zambada during his trial emphasized the pervasive influence of the cartel: "The organization has more power than the government because the government itself is corrupt." This statement underscores the extent to which organized crime has infiltrated various institutions in Mexico.

In October 2019, Vicente Zambada was sentenced to 15 years in prison by a U.S. federal court for his involvement in drug trafficking. Despite his cooperation with authorities, Zambada still faced significant legal consequences for his criminal activities.

Then in 2023, that cooperation with the United States Government came to an end after a visit from a known Sinaloan sponsored lawyer.


In this episode, we begin our exploration of the case brought by the United States of America against Vicente Zambada and what has transpired since.

(commercial at 9:43)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


show_temp-3.pl-1.pdf (wired.com)

Vicente Zambada Niebla, also known as "El Vicentillo," is a prominent figure in Mexican organized crime, specifically associated with the Sinaloa Cartel. Born on February 14, 1975, in Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico, he is the son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, one of the top leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel. Vicente Zambada rose through the ranks within the cartel and became one of its key operatives.

Zambada was implicated in various drug trafficking activities, including coordinating the transportation and distribution of narcotics, primarily cocaine and marijuana, into the United States. His role within the cartel involved managing logistics, negotiating with other criminal organizations, and overseeing drug shipments.

In February 2009, Vicente Zambada was arrested by Mexican authorities in Mexico City. His arrest was a significant blow to the Sinaloa Cartel, as he was considered one of its highest-ranking members at the time. Zambada's capture highlighted the ongoing efforts by law enforcement to dismantle the cartel's leadership structure.

During his trial in the United States, Zambada provided extensive testimony against other members of the Sinaloa Cartel, including his own father, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, as well as Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, the infamous former leader of the cartel. His cooperation with U.S. authorities led to the conviction of numerous cartel members and provided valuable insights into the inner workings of the organization.

Throughout the trial, Zambada's testimony shed light on the violence, corruption, and vast network of drug trafficking that characterized the Sinaloa Cartel's operations. His insights were crucial in building cases against other cartel leaders and dismantling key aspects of their criminal enterprise.

One notable quote from Vicente Zambada during his trial emphasized the pervasive influence of the cartel: "The organization has more power than the government because the government itself is corrupt." This statement underscores the extent to which organized crime has infiltrated various institutions in Mexico.

In October 2019, Vicente Zambada was sentenced to 15 years in prison by a U.S. federal court for his involvement in drug trafficking. Despite his cooperation with authorities, Zambada still faced significant legal consequences for his criminal activities.

Then in 2023, that cooperation with the United States Government came to an end after a visit from a known Sinaloan sponsored lawyer.


In this episode, we begin our exploration of the case brought by the United States of America against Vicente Zambada and what has transpired since.

(commercial at 7:58)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


show_temp-3.pl-1.pdf (wired.com)

Vicente Zambada Niebla, also known as "El Vicentillo," is a prominent figure in Mexican organized crime, specifically associated with the Sinaloa Cartel. Born on February 14, 1975, in Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico, he is the son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, one of the top leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel. Vicente Zambada rose through the ranks within the cartel and became one of its key operatives.

Zambada was implicated in various drug trafficking activities, including coordinating the transportation and distribution of narcotics, primarily cocaine and marijuana, into the United States. His role within the cartel involved managing logistics, negotiating with other criminal organizations, and overseeing drug shipments.

In February 2009, Vicente Zambada was arrested by Mexican authorities in Mexico City. His arrest was a significant blow to the Sinaloa Cartel, as he was considered one of its highest-ranking members at the time. Zambada's capture highlighted the ongoing efforts by law enforcement to dismantle the cartel's leadership structure.

During his trial in the United States, Zambada provided extensive testimony against other members of the Sinaloa Cartel, including his own father, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, as well as Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, the infamous former leader of the cartel. His cooperation with U.S. authorities led to the conviction of numerous cartel members and provided valuable insights into the inner workings of the organization.

Throughout the trial, Zambada's testimony shed light on the violence, corruption, and vast network of drug trafficking that characterized the Sinaloa Cartel's operations. His insights were crucial in building cases against other cartel leaders and dismantling key aspects of their criminal enterprise.

One notable quote from Vicente Zambada during his trial emphasized the pervasive influence of the cartel: "The organization has more power than the government because the government itself is corrupt." This statement underscores the extent to which organized crime has infiltrated various institutions in Mexico.

In October 2019, Vicente Zambada was sentenced to 15 years in prison by a U.S. federal court for his involvement in drug trafficking. Despite his cooperation with authorities, Zambada still faced significant legal consequences for his criminal activities.

Then in 2023, that cooperation with the United States Government came to an end after a visit from a known Sinaloan sponsored lawyer.


In this episode, we begin our exploration of the case brought by the United States of America against Vicente Zambada and what has transpired since.

(commercial at 13:35)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


show_temp-3.pl-1.pdf (wired.com)

Vicente Zambada Niebla, also known as "El Vicentillo," is a prominent figure in Mexican organized crime, specifically associated with the Sinaloa Cartel. Born on February 14, 1975, in Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico, he is the son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, one of the top leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel. Vicente Zambada rose through the ranks within the cartel and became one of its key operatives.

Zambada was implicated in various drug trafficking activities, including coordinating the transportation and distribution of narcotics, primarily cocaine and marijuana, into the United States. His role within the cartel involved managing logistics, negotiating with other criminal organizations, and overseeing drug shipments.

In February 2009, Vicente Zambada was arrested by Mexican authorities in Mexico City. His arrest was a significant blow to the Sinaloa Cartel, as he was considered one of its highest-ranking members at the time. Zambada's capture highlighted the ongoing efforts by law enforcement to dismantle the cartel's leadership structure.

During his trial in the United States, Zambada provided extensive testimony against other members of the Sinaloa Cartel, including his own father, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, as well as Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, the infamous former leader of the cartel. His cooperation with U.S. authorities led to the conviction of numerous cartel members and provided valuable insights into the inner workings of the organization.

Throughout the trial, Zambada's testimony shed light on the violence, corruption, and vast network of drug trafficking that characterized the Sinaloa Cartel's operations. His insights were crucial in building cases against other cartel leaders and dismantling key aspects of their criminal enterprise.

One notable quote from Vicente Zambada during his trial emphasized the pervasive influence of the cartel: "The organization has more power than the government because the government itself is corrupt." This statement underscores the extent to which organized crime has infiltrated various institutions in Mexico.

In October 2019, Vicente Zambada was sentenced to 15 years in prison by a U.S. federal court for his involvement in drug trafficking. Despite his cooperation with authorities, Zambada still faced significant legal consequences for his criminal activities.

Then in 2023, that cooperation with the United States Government came to an end after a visit from a known Sinaloan sponsored lawyer.


In this episode, we begin our exploration of the case brought by the United States of America against Vicente Zambada and what has transpired since.

(commercial at 8:55)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


show_temp-3.pl-1.pdf (wired.com)

Vicente Zambada Niebla, also known as "El Vicentillo," is a prominent figure in Mexican organized crime, specifically associated with the Sinaloa Cartel. Born on February 14, 1975, in Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico, he is the son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, one of the top leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel. Vicente Zambada rose through the ranks within the cartel and became one of its key operatives.

Zambada was implicated in various drug trafficking activities, including coordinating the transportation and distribution of narcotics, primarily cocaine and marijuana, into the United States. His role within the cartel involved managing logistics, negotiating with other criminal organizations, and overseeing drug shipments.

In February 2009, Vicente Zambada was arrested by Mexican authorities in Mexico City. His arrest was a significant blow to the Sinaloa Cartel, as he was considered one of its highest-ranking members at the time. Zambada's capture highlighted the ongoing efforts by law enforcement to dismantle the cartel's leadership structure.

During his trial in the United States, Zambada provided extensive testimony against other members of the Sinaloa Cartel, including his own father, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, as well as Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, the infamous former leader of the cartel. His cooperation with U.S. authorities led to the conviction of numerous cartel members and provided valuable insights into the inner workings of the organization.

Throughout the trial, Zambada's testimony shed light on the violence, corruption, and vast network of drug trafficking that characterized the Sinaloa Cartel's operations. His insights were crucial in building cases against other cartel leaders and dismantling key aspects of their criminal enterprise.

One notable quote from Vicente Zambada during his trial emphasized the pervasive influence of the cartel: "The organization has more power than the government because the government itself is corrupt." This statement underscores the extent to which organized crime has infiltrated various institutions in Mexico.

In October 2019, Vicente Zambada was sentenced to 15 years in prison by a U.S. federal court for his involvement in drug trafficking. Despite his cooperation with authorities, Zambada still faced significant legal consequences for his criminal activities.

Then in 2023, that cooperation with the United States Government came to an end after a visit from a known Sinaloan sponsored lawyer.


In this episode, we begin our exploration of the case brought by the United States of America against Vicente Zambada and what has transpired since.

(commercial at 8:20)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


show_temp-3.pl-1.pdf (wired.com)

Vicente Zambada Niebla, also known as "El Vicentillo," is a prominent figure in Mexican organized crime, specifically associated with the Sinaloa Cartel. Born on February 14, 1975, in Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico, he is the son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, one of the top leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel. Vicente Zambada rose through the ranks within the cartel and became one of its key operatives.

Zambada was implicated in various drug trafficking activities, including coordinating the transportation and distribution of narcotics, primarily cocaine and marijuana, into the United States. His role within the cartel involved managing logistics, negotiating with other criminal organizations, and overseeing drug shipments.

In February 2009, Vicente Zambada was arrested by Mexican authorities in Mexico City. His arrest was a significant blow to the Sinaloa Cartel, as he was considered one of its highest-ranking members at the time. Zambada's capture highlighted the ongoing efforts by law enforcement to dismantle the cartel's leadership structure.

During his trial in the United States, Zambada provided extensive testimony against other members of the Sinaloa Cartel, including his own father, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, as well as Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, the infamous former leader of the cartel. His cooperation with U.S. authorities led to the conviction of numerous cartel members and provided valuable insights into the inner workings of the organization.

Throughout the trial, Zambada's testimony shed light on the violence, corruption, and vast network of drug trafficking that characterized the Sinaloa Cartel's operations. His insights were crucial in building cases against other cartel leaders and dismantling key aspects of their criminal enterprise.

One notable quote from Vicente Zambada during his trial emphasized the pervasive influence of the cartel: "The organization has more power than the government because the government itself is corrupt." This statement underscores the extent to which organized crime has infiltrated various institutions in Mexico.

In October 2019, Vicente Zambada was sentenced to 15 years in prison by a U.S. federal court for his involvement in drug trafficking. Despite his cooperation with authorities, Zambada still faced significant legal consequences for his criminal activities.

Then in 2023, that cooperation with the United States Government came to an end after a visit from a known Sinaloan sponsored lawyer.


In this episode, we begin our exploration of the case brought by the United States of America against Vicente Zambada and what has transpired since.

(commercial at 7:27)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


show_temp-3.pl-1.pdf (wired.com)

Vicente Zambada Niebla, also known as "El Vicentillo," is a prominent figure in Mexican organized crime, specifically associated with the Sinaloa Cartel. Born on February 14, 1975, in Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico, he is the son of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, one of the top leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel. Vicente Zambada rose through the ranks within the cartel and became one of its key operatives.

Zambada was implicated in various drug trafficking activities, including coordinating the transportation and distribution of narcotics, primarily cocaine and marijuana, into the United States. His role within the cartel involved managing logistics, negotiating with other criminal organizations, and overseeing drug shipments.

In February 2009, Vicente Zambada was arrested by Mexican authorities in Mexico City. His arrest was a significant blow to the Sinaloa Cartel, as he was considered one of its highest-ranking members at the time. Zambada's capture highlighted the ongoing efforts by law enforcement to dismantle the cartel's leadership structure.

During his trial in the United States, Zambada provided extensive testimony against other members of the Sinaloa Cartel, including his own father, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada García, as well as Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, the infamous former leader of the cartel. His cooperation with U.S. authorities led to the conviction of numerous cartel members and provided valuable insights into the inner workings of the organization.

Throughout the trial, Zambada's testimony shed light on the violence, corruption, and vast network of drug trafficking that characterized the Sinaloa Cartel's operations. His insights were crucial in building cases against other cartel leaders and dismantling key aspects of their criminal enterprise.

One notable quote from Vicente Zambada during his trial emphasized the pervasive influence of the cartel: "The organization has more power than the government because the government itself is corrupt." This statement underscores the extent to which organized crime has infiltrated various institutions in Mexico.

In October 2019, Vicente Zambada was sentenced to 15 years in prison by a U.S. federal court for his involvement in drug trafficking. Despite his cooperation with authorities, Zambada still faced significant legal consequences for his criminal activities.

Then in 2023, that cooperation with the United States Government came to an end after a visit from a known Sinaloan sponsored lawyer.


In this episode, we begin our exploration of the case brought by the United States of America against Vicente Zambada and what has transpired since.

(commercial at 8:11)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:


show_temp-3.pl-1.pdf (wired.com)

Jesús Vicente Zambada Niebla, also known as "El Vicentillo," played a crucial role in providing the U.S. government with detailed information about the Sinaloa Cartel's operations after his arrest in 2009. His plea agreement included admissions of coordinating the transport of multi-ton cocaine shipments from Panama and Colombia to Mexico and distributing heroin in the U.S. In exchange for a reduced sentence, Zambada Niebla forfeited $1.37 billion in assets and provided extensive intelligence on the cartel, including its bribery of Mexican officials and logistical operations using various transport methods like aircraft, submarines, and tractor-trailers​.


His cooperation raised concerns about potential repercussions for the cartel, especially for his father, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, who assumed leadership after El Chapo's arrest. The information shared by El Vicentillo significantly impacted U.S. efforts to combat the cartel, leading to arrests and heightened security measures against drug trafficking activities. His cooperation also fueled speculation about the extent of the Zambada family's involvement in facilitating law enforcement actions against other cartel leaders ..



(commercial at 955:


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com





source:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/88qgpk/sinaloa-cartel-leader-el-mayos-son-wants-a-deal-to-stay-in-the-us

When a leader of a criminal group like the Sinaloa Cartel is arrested or killed, several dynamics contribute to ensuing violence:

1. Power Vacuum: The sudden absence of a central figure creates a leadership gap, prompting internal factions to vie for control. This competition often leads to violent confrontations as different groups within the cartel seek to establish dominance.
2. Factional Rivalries: Within large criminal organizations, various factions have their own leaders and loyalties. Leadership changes exacerbate these rivalries, with factions battling to position their leaders as the new heads of the organization. For instance, the rivalry between Los Chapitos (the sons of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán) and the faction loyal to Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada is a prime example of such internal conflicts.
3. External Threats: Rival criminal organizations, such as the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG), see leadership changes as opportunities to attack and weaken the Sinaloa Cartel. These external groups might intensify their efforts to seize territories or resources, leading to increased violence.
4. Assertion of Control: New leaders or emerging factions must assert their authority and control over the cartel’s operations and members. This often involves violent actions to demonstrate power, eliminate dissenters, and enforce loyalty within the ranks.
5. Territorial Disputes: Leadership changes can disrupt established agreements and boundaries, leading to disputes over territories. These disputes often result in violent clashes as different factions or rival groups attempt to control lucrative drug trafficking routes and areas.
6. Law Enforcement Pressure: Increased attention from law enforcement following a high-profile arrest can lead to more violent encounters. The remaining members may resort to violence to evade capture, protect their operations, or retaliate against perceived informants.

The arrest of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, for example, is expected to trigger such violence within the Sinaloa Cartel as factions compete to fill the leadership void, and rival groups like the CJNG attempt to capitalize on the instability​.


(commercial at 9:46)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:




Mexican kingpin’s arrest likely to set off violent jockeying for power (nbcnews.com)

As our exploration of the dirty corridors of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal operation continues, we are now diving into the deposition that Sarah Ransome gave as part of the lawsuit between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts.



(commercial at 9:32)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud

As our exploration of the dirty corridors of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal operation continues, we are now diving into the deposition that Sarah Ransome gave as part of the lawsuit between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts.



(commercial at 12:24)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud

As our exploration of the dirty corridors of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal operation continues, we are now diving into the deposition that Sarah Ransome gave as part of the lawsuit between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts.



(commercial at 8:30)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud

As our exploration of the dirty corridors of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal operation continues, we are now diving into the deposition that Sarah Ransome gave as part of the lawsuit between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts.



(commercial at 13:28)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud

As our exploration of the dirty corridors of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal operation continues, we are now diving into the deposition that Sarah Ransome gave as part of the lawsuit between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts.



(commercial at 9:29)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud

The war on drugs is considered a failure for several key reasons:

1. Ineffectiveness in Reducing Drug Use: Despite decades of effort, drug use and availability have not significantly decreased. The illegal drug market continues to meet demand, demonstrating that supply-side measures alone are insufficient​.
2. High Financial Costs: The U.S. spends about $47 billion annually on drug enforcement. This significant investment has not achieved substantial reductions in drug use or drug-related crime, indicating inefficient use of resources.​ 
3. Increased Drug Potency: Prohibition incentivizes the production of more potent drugs, as they are more profitable in an illegal market. This has led to higher rates of overdoses and drug-related deaths, as users seek stronger substances to achieve the same effects​
4. Public Health Impact: The focus on criminalization over treatment has diverted resources away from public health approaches. This has hindered efforts to provide effective treatment and support for individuals with substance use disorders, resulting in higher rates of addiction and overdose deaths​.
5. Continued Violence and Corruption: The illegal drug trade fuels violence and corruption. Cartels and organized crime groups thrive in the illegal market, perpetuating cycles of violence and instability, particularly in drug-producing and transit countries.
6. Ineffectiveness of Interdiction Efforts: Despite extensive efforts to intercept drug shipments, only a small fraction of drugs are seized before reaching consumers. This demonstrates the resilience of drug trafficking networks and the difficulty of disrupting the supply chain​.

As far as the DEA and their strategy of dealing with Cartels:


The DEA's decapitation strategy, aimed at dismantling cartels by targeting their leaders, has largely failed in Mexico due to several key reasons:

1. Fragmentation: Arresting or killing cartel leaders often results in the cartel splitting into smaller, more violent factions. These fragmented groups are less centralized and harder for law enforcement to track and combat.
2. Internal Power Struggles: The removal of top leaders triggers violent power struggles within the cartel as different factions compete for dominance. This increases overall violence and instability.
3. Rapid Replacement: Cartels have hierarchical structures that allow for quick replacement of leaders. New leaders often step in immediately to continue operations, ensuring minimal disruption to the cartel’s activities.
4. Diversification and Resilience: Fragmented cartels diversify their criminal activities beyond drug trafficking, engaging in extortion, kidnapping, and other crimes. This diversification makes them more resilient and harder to eradicate.
5. Increased Violence: The decentralization and fragmentation lead to increased violence not only within the cartel but also among rival groups vying for territory and control. This has resulted in higher levels of violence and insecurity in regions affected by cartel operations.

Overall, the decapitation strategy has not weakened the overall power of the cartels but has instead led to greater fragmentation, diversification of criminal activities, and increased violence, contributing to instability in Mexico.


(commercial at 11:29)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

‘Nada cambia’: Mexican drugs lord ‘El Mayo’ has been captured, but does targeting kingpins work? | Drugs trade | The Guardian

Recent reports suggest that Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, a leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, was allegedly kidnapped by Joaquin Guzman Lopez, the son of Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, before being handed over to U.S. authorities. According to Zambada's lawyer, Frank Perez, Guzman Lopez and six men dressed in military uniforms ambushed Zambada near Culiacan, Mexico, forced him onto a plane, and brought him to the United States. This incident allegedly involved deception, as Guzman Lopez had tricked Zambada into believing they were flying to northern Mexico to inspect real estate.

However, some U.S. officials described the event as a negotiated surrender rather than a kidnapping. They reported that Guzman Lopez had planned to surrender himself and lured Zambada onto the plane under false pretenses. Upon landing in El Paso, Texas, both men were taken into custody by federal agents​.

Whatever the case may be, one thing is for sure:   Panic is starting to set in for government officials in Mexico who were doing business with El mayo and it's only a matter of time before El Mayo sings his own version of a narcocorrido that includes the names of the dirty and the corrupt who were eating from his plate.

(commercial at 11:01)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Ismael ‘El Mayo’ Zambada: Attorney for Mexican drug lord says client ‘forcibly kidnapped’ by El Chapo’s son | CNN

The memorandum of law in support of the government's trial motions in limine for the El Chapo trial outlines several key points aimed at shaping the scope of evidence and arguments presented during the trial:

1. Exclusion of Irrelevant Evidence: The government sought to exclude evidence and arguments that it deemed irrelevant to the core issues of the case. This included precluding the defense from presenting evidence that did not directly relate to the charges against Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán or that could potentially mislead the jury.
2. Prior Bad Acts and Other Crimes: The government moved to admit evidence of Guzmán's prior bad acts and other crimes to demonstrate his pattern of criminal behavior. This was aimed at establishing a broader context for the charges he faced, including his leadership role in the Sinaloa Cartel and his involvement in drug trafficking and violence.
3. Witness Protection and Anonymity: To protect the safety of witnesses, the government requested that certain witnesses be allowed to testify under pseudonyms and that their identities be kept confidential. This was crucial given the violent nature of Guzmán's cartel and the potential threats to the witnesses' lives.
4. Limitation on Defense Arguments: The memorandum also sought to limit certain defense arguments that might distract from the primary issues or introduce unfair prejudice. For example, it aimed to restrict the defense from arguing that Guzmán was merely a scapegoat or that the charges were politically motivated without substantial evidence to support such claims.

These motions were designed to streamline the trial, ensure a focus on the pertinent facts, and protect the integrity and safety of the judicial process.



(commercial at 8:31)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The memorandum of law in support of the government's trial motions in limine for the El Chapo trial outlines several key points aimed at shaping the scope of evidence and arguments presented during the trial:

1. Exclusion of Irrelevant Evidence: The government sought to exclude evidence and arguments that it deemed irrelevant to the core issues of the case. This included precluding the defense from presenting evidence that did not directly relate to the charges against Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán or that could potentially mislead the jury.
2. Prior Bad Acts and Other Crimes: The government moved to admit evidence of Guzmán's prior bad acts and other crimes to demonstrate his pattern of criminal behavior. This was aimed at establishing a broader context for the charges he faced, including his leadership role in the Sinaloa Cartel and his involvement in drug trafficking and violence.
3. Witness Protection and Anonymity: To protect the safety of witnesses, the government requested that certain witnesses be allowed to testify under pseudonyms and that their identities be kept confidential. This was crucial given the violent nature of Guzmán's cartel and the potential threats to the witnesses' lives.
4. Limitation on Defense Arguments: The memorandum also sought to limit certain defense arguments that might distract from the primary issues or introduce unfair prejudice. For example, it aimed to restrict the defense from arguing that Guzmán was merely a scapegoat or that the charges were politically motivated without substantial evidence to support such claims.

These motions were designed to streamline the trial, ensure a focus on the pertinent facts, and protect the integrity and safety of the judicial process.



(commercial at 8:07)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The memorandum of law in support of the government's trial motions in limine for the El Chapo trial outlines several key points aimed at shaping the scope of evidence and arguments presented during the trial:

1. Exclusion of Irrelevant Evidence: The government sought to exclude evidence and arguments that it deemed irrelevant to the core issues of the case. This included precluding the defense from presenting evidence that did not directly relate to the charges against Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán or that could potentially mislead the jury.
2. Prior Bad Acts and Other Crimes: The government moved to admit evidence of Guzmán's prior bad acts and other crimes to demonstrate his pattern of criminal behavior. This was aimed at establishing a broader context for the charges he faced, including his leadership role in the Sinaloa Cartel and his involvement in drug trafficking and violence.
3. Witness Protection and Anonymity: To protect the safety of witnesses, the government requested that certain witnesses be allowed to testify under pseudonyms and that their identities be kept confidential. This was crucial given the violent nature of Guzmán's cartel and the potential threats to the witnesses' lives.
4. Limitation on Defense Arguments: The memorandum also sought to limit certain defense arguments that might distract from the primary issues or introduce unfair prejudice. For example, it aimed to restrict the defense from arguing that Guzmán was merely a scapegoat or that the charges were politically motivated without substantial evidence to support such claims.

These motions were designed to streamline the trial, ensure a focus on the pertinent facts, and protect the integrity and safety of the judicial process.



(commercial at 6:09)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

As our exploration of the dirty corridors of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal operation continues, we are now diving into the deposition that Sarah Ransome gave as part of the lawsuit between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts.



(commercial at 9:26)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud

As our exploration of the dirty corridors of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal operation continues, we are now diving into the deposition that Sarah Ransome gave as part of the lawsuit between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts.



(commercial at 9:55)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud

As our exploration of the dirty corridors of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal operation continues, we are now diving into the deposition that Sarah Ransome gave as part of the lawsuit between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts.



(commercial at 9:55)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud

As our exploration of the dirty corridors of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal operation continues, we are now diving into the deposition that Sarah Ransome gave as part of the lawsuit between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts.



(commercial at 10:27)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud

As our exploration of the dirty corridors of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal operation continues, we are now diving into the deposition that Sarah Ransome gave as part of the lawsuit between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts.



(commercial at 11:19)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud

The Flores brothers, Pedro and Margarito Flores, are twin brothers from Chicago who played a crucial role in the downfall of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, the notorious leader of the Sinaloa cartel.Background:

• The Flores twins grew up in the Little Village neighborhood of Chicago. They entered the drug trade at a young age, gradually building a major drug trafficking operation. By their mid-20s, they had become major players, directly linked to the Sinaloa cartel.

Involvement with El Chapo:

• The Flores brothers were key distributors for the Sinaloa cartel in the United States, responsible for moving massive quantities of cocaine and heroin into the country. Their operation spanned multiple states, making them integral to El Chapo's drug empire.

Turning Informants:

• In 2008, faced with the risk of severe legal consequences and potential threats to their families, the Flores twins made a pivotal decision to cooperate with U.S. authorities. They agreed to become informants, providing critical inside information about the cartel's operations.
• Their cooperation included secretly recording conversations with high-ranking cartel members, including El Chapo himself. These recordings provided valuable evidence that was used to dismantle significant parts of the cartel's network.

Impact on El Chapo's Conviction:

• The information and evidence provided by the Flores brothers were instrumental in the eventual capture and prosecution of El Chapo. Their testimonies and the recordings they made were pivotal in securing his conviction in 2019, leading to a life sentence plus 30 years for Guzmán.

Current Status:

• After cooperating with authorities, the Flores brothers entered the federal witness protection program to ensure their safety. Their cooperation and testimonies were highly risky, given the violent retaliation methods often employed by drug cartels.

Legacy:

• The Flores brothers' cooperation marked one of the most significant inside jobs against a major drug cartel in U.S. law enforcement history. Their actions have been documented in various media, shedding light on the inner workings of the drug trade and the challenges faced by those who choose to turn informant against such powerful criminal organizations​.

In this episode we hear from the Flores brothers who break down the arrest of El Mayo and what they think will happen in the wake of the shocking take down of one of the worlds most wanted men.

(commercial at 10:30)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

'El Mayo' arrest on minds of Chicago twins who cooperated against cartel (chicagotribune.com)

The Sinaloa Cartel, notorious for its extensive drug trafficking operations, has been setting up makeshift fentanyl labs in Colombia, using precursor chemicals primarily sourced from China. This initiative is part of the cartel's effort to establish and control the fentanyl production process from start to finish, further extending its influence and operational capabilities beyond Mexico.

These improvised labs, often referred to as "bathtub labs" due to their rudimentary setup, are typically found in remote areas or hidden within legitimate agricultural operations to avoid detection. The production process is highly toxic and dangerous, involving a mixture of chemicals like acetone, acetate, and chlorine, combined with the essential fentanyl precursor. The final product is refined and prepared for distribution in various forms such as powder, ampules, or pills​.

The cartel's operations in Colombia are facilitated through collaboration with local criminal groups, including the Clan del Golfo, which controls significant cocaine production and distribution routes. This partnership allows the Sinaloa Cartel to leverage existing smuggling networks to transport fentanyl and its precursors across borders.

In addition to traditional smuggling methods, the cartel employs sophisticated techniques to camouflage and transport fentanyl. These include using small airplanes, vehicles with hidden compartments, and other methods designed to evade detection by law enforcement agencies. The distribution network extends to major U.S. cities, where the demand for synthetic opioids continues to fuel the cartel's operations.

In this episode, we take a look.


(commercial at 9:19)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Sinaloa Cartel exports fentanyl ‘kitchens’ from Mexico to Colombia amid international crackdown | Fox News

Nacho Coronel, also known as Ignacio Coronel Villarreal, was a key figure in the Sinaloa Cartel, one of Mexico's most powerful and influential drug trafficking organizations. Often referred to as the "King of Ice" due to his significant role in the methamphetamine trade, Coronel was responsible for much of the cartel's operations in the western states of Mexico.

Coronel's influence within the Sinaloa Cartel was substantial, as he was one of the top lieutenants under Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán and Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada. His death occurred on July 29, 2010, during a raid by the Mexican Army in Zapopan, Jalisco. The military operation resulted in Coronel being killed after he reportedly resisted arrest.

In the aftermath of Coronel's death, the Sinaloa Cartel faced a period of turbulence and restructuring. Key changes included:

1. Power Vacuum and Internal Struggles: Coronel's death left a significant power vacuum within the cartel, leading to internal struggles for control over his territories and operations. This period saw an increase in violence and infighting as different factions and individuals vied for power.
2. Increased Military Pressure: The Mexican government intensified its efforts against the Sinaloa Cartel and other criminal organizations, leading to further arrests and deaths of key cartel members. This increased pressure further destabilized the cartel's operations.
3. Shifts in Leadership and Strategy: El Chapo Guzmán and El Mayo Zambada had to reorganize and adapt their strategies to maintain control and efficiency within the cartel. This often involved delegating responsibilities to other trusted lieutenants and allies within the organization.
4. Fragmentation and Rivalries: The loss of a central figure like Coronel contributed to the fragmentation of the cartel into smaller, more autonomous cells. These smaller groups sometimes engaged in rivalries and conflicts, both within the Sinaloa Cartel and with other criminal organizations.

(commercial at 10:10)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Ciudad Juarez: Ignacio Coronel and What Happens After a Drug Lord is Killed - The Awl

Nacho Coronel, also known as Ignacio Coronel Villarreal, was a key figure in the Sinaloa Cartel, one of Mexico's most powerful and influential drug trafficking organizations. Often referred to as the "King of Ice" due to his significant role in the methamphetamine trade, Coronel was responsible for much of the cartel's operations in the western states of Mexico.

Coronel's influence within the Sinaloa Cartel was substantial, as he was one of the top lieutenants under Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán and Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada. His death occurred on July 29, 2010, during a raid by the Mexican Army in Zapopan, Jalisco. The military operation resulted in Coronel being killed after he reportedly resisted arrest.

In the aftermath of Coronel's death, the Sinaloa Cartel faced a period of turbulence and restructuring. Key changes included:

1. Power Vacuum and Internal Struggles: Coronel's death left a significant power vacuum within the cartel, leading to internal struggles for control over his territories and operations. This period saw an increase in violence and infighting as different factions and individuals vied for power.
2. Increased Military Pressure: The Mexican government intensified its efforts against the Sinaloa Cartel and other criminal organizations, leading to further arrests and deaths of key cartel members. This increased pressure further destabilized the cartel's operations.
3. Shifts in Leadership and Strategy: El Chapo Guzmán and El Mayo Zambada had to reorganize and adapt their strategies to maintain control and efficiency within the cartel. This often involved delegating responsibilities to other trusted lieutenants and allies within the organization.
4. Fragmentation and Rivalries: The loss of a central figure like Coronel contributed to the fragmentation of the cartel into smaller, more autonomous cells. These smaller groups sometimes engaged in rivalries and conflicts, both within the Sinaloa Cartel and with other criminal organizations.

(commercial at 10:10)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

Ciudad Juarez: Ignacio Coronel and What Happens After a Drug Lord is Killed - The Awl

Bill Gates’ relationship with Jeffrey Epstein has been a subject of scrutiny and controversy. Gates met Epstein several times between 2011 and 2013, hoping Epstein could help secure funding for global health initiatives through his network of wealthy contacts. Gates has since admitted that these interactions were a mistake, stating that he regretted giving Epstein any credibility by associating with him.

The meetings reportedly included discussions about philanthropy and other personal matters, such as Gates confiding in Epstein about his marriage to Melinda French Gates. This connection is believed to have been a contributing factor in Gates’ divorce, finalized in 2021. Epstein's involvement in these discussions raised eyebrows, especially given his criminal history and the allegations against him.

Gates has emphasized that once it became clear that Epstein's promises of securing philanthropic funds were not genuine, he cut ties with him. Gates’ admission came amid broader revelations about Epstein’s connections with various high-profile individuals, which have been scrutinized following Epstein's arrest and subsequent death in 2019.

The fallout from Gates' association with Epstein has impacted his public image and personal life, adding a layer of complexity to his otherwise well-regarded philanthropic efforts. Despite this controversy, Gates continues to work through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, although the foundation's future operations have been under review following his divorce.


Now, in a new book set to drop on August 13th, the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates is once again on display.


(commercial at 10:54)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Jeffrey Epstein 'tunneled' his way into Bill Gates's orbit costing the billionaire his marriage and almost shattering his reputation, new book reveals | Daily Mail Online

Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) has faced allegations and suspicions regarding his relationship with Mexican drug cartels, particularly the Sinaloa Cartel. These allegations stem from various incidents and perceived actions during his presidency:

1. Accusations of Leniency: Critics accuse AMLO of being lenient towards the cartels, particularly the Sinaloa Cartel. His administration's approach, termed "abrazos, no balazos" (hugs, not bullets), focuses on social programs to address the root causes of crime rather than aggressive military action. This policy has been interpreted by some as being too soft on the cartels.
2. Culiacán Incident (2019): One of the most notable incidents was the release of Ovidio Guzmán, a son of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, after his brief arrest in Culiacán. The Mexican government cited concerns over civilian safety due to the violent response from the cartel as the reason for his release. Critics viewed this as a sign of weakness and possible collusion with the Sinaloa Cartel.
3. Visits to Cartel-Controlled Areas: AMLO has made several visits to areas known to be under cartel influence, including the hometown of El Chapo in Sinaloa. During these visits, his interactions with locals and lack of strong rhetoric against the cartels have fueled speculation about his relationship with these groups.
4. Claims of Electoral Influence: There have been claims that cartels, including the Sinaloa Cartel, have influenced local elections to favor candidates sympathetic to their operations. While there is no concrete evidence linking AMLO directly to such activities, the overall environment of cartel influence in politics raises questions.
5. Criticism from Opposition and Media: Opposition parties and media outlets have been vocal in their criticism, suggesting that AMLO's policies and actions benefit the cartels, particularly the Sinaloa Cartel. These accusations are often part of broader political battles and may lack substantiated proof.

(commercial at 7:14)

to contact me:

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/rumours-mexican-president-brokering-cartel-28405014

As our exploration of the dirty corridors of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal operation continues, we are now diving into the deposition that Sarah Ransome gave as part of the lawsuit between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts.



(commercial at 9:29)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud

As our exploration of the dirty corridors of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal operation continues, we are now diving into the deposition that Sarah Ransome gave as part of the lawsuit between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts.



(commercial at 9:59)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud

As our exploration of the dirty corridors of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal operation continues, we are now diving into the deposition that Sarah Ransome gave as part of the lawsuit between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts.



(commercial at 8:29)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud

As our exploration of the dirty corridors of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal operation continues, we are now diving into the deposition that Sarah Ransome gave as part of the lawsuit between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Roberts.



(commercial at 8:29)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

DE 701-1 — Sarah Ransome depo - DocumentCloud

In October 2023, Guerrero, a state in southern Mexico, experienced a brutal ambush that led to the deaths of 13 police officers, including the municipal security secretary. This attack occurred in El Papayo, near Coyuca de Benítez, on the highway connecting Acapulco and Zihuatanejo. The ambush was executed by at least 30 heavily armed men from an unidentified criminal organization​.

During the attack, six police officers were kidnapped, tortured, and subsequently killed, adding to the severity of the incident. Authorities stated that forensic experts were deployed to collect evidence and conduct investigations. Despite the large-scale violence, no prior threats had been reported against the local officials in Coyuca de Benítez​.

Guerrero is one of Mexico's most violent states, largely due to turf wars between rival drug cartels. The region is a significant producer of opium poppies and marijuana, contributing to the ongoing conflict. The attack in Guerrero reflects the broader issue of cartel-related violence that has plagued Mexico for years. Since the Mexican government deployed the military in its war on drugs in 2006, over 420,000 people have been murdered, and more than 110,000 have disappeared, most of whom were victims of criminal organizations​.

In this episode, we take a look back at the Guerrero massacre.   


(commercial at 7:32)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/23/world/americas/mexico-police-attack.html

The arrests of Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada and Joaquín Guzmán López, son of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, have raised significant intrigue and speculation due to the mysterious circumstances surrounding their capture. Both were apprehended in El Paso, Texas, a major breakthrough in the U.S. efforts against the Sinaloa Cartel.

One of the leading theories suggests that Zambada, a historic leader of the Sinaloa Cartel, may have been kidnapped prior to his arrest. Reports indicate that he might have been lured onto a plane by Guzmán López under the pretense of a real estate transaction, only to be handed over to U.S. authorities upon landing in El Paso. This scenario points to potential internal betrayal within the cartel or secret negotiations with U.S. law enforcement​.

The DEA has emphasized the importance of these arrests, noting that Zambada has been a top target for decades due to his significant role in drug trafficking operations. The apprehension of these figures is seen as a major blow to the cartel's operations​​. However, the exact details and motivations behind their capture remain unclear, fueling ongoing speculation and investigation into the events leading up to their arrest​.


In this episode, we continue our exploration of the arrest and the circumstances surrounding it.


(commercial at 8:45)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

El Chapo’s son denies making deal with US prior to arrest, pleads not guilty in court | CNN

On July 17, 2024, Juan Guzmán López, son of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, pleaded not guilty to multiple charges, including drug trafficking and money laundering, in a federal court in Chicago. During the 15-minute arraignment, Guzmán López appeared before U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman, where he wore an orange prison jumpsuit and was shackled at the ankles. His plea was made through a translator. This court appearance follows his extradition from Mexico to the U.S., where he faces allegations of being involved in his father's extensive drug trafficking operations​.

Guzmán López, along with his brother Ovidio Guzmán López, is accused of being a significant player in the Sinaloa Cartel, continuing the operations after their father’s imprisonment. The U.S. government alleges that they were involved in the production and distribution of large quantities of fentanyl and other drugs into the United States. These actions have led to substantial indictments aimed at curbing the influence and operations of the Sinaloa Cartel.

The defense team for Guzmán López is expected to challenge the prosecution's evidence, which includes wiretaps, witness testimonies, and other forms of intelligence gathered over several years. The case is being closely watched as it represents a significant effort by U.S. authorities to dismantle one of the most powerful drug trafficking organizations in the world​.



(commercial at 9:50)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

El Chapo’s son denies making deal with US prior to arrest, pleads not guilty in court | CNN

Antonio "Tony Montana" Oseguera Cervantes, brother of Nemesio "El Mencho" Oseguera, was arrested in December 2022 by Mexican authorities in a suburban area of Guadalajara. Tony Montana is accused of managing financial and logistical operations for the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG). His arrest represents a significant setback for the CJNG, as he held a pivotal role within the organization. Following his capture, Mexican authorities approved his extradition to the United States, where he faces numerous charges, including drug trafficking and organized crime.

The operation to apprehend Tony Montana involved a coordinated effort between various Mexican law enforcement agencies. Reports indicate that he was responsible for laundering money, coordinating international drug shipments, and managing the cartel's vast network of operatives. His extradition to the U.S. is part of broader efforts to dismantle the leadership structure of the CJNG, which has been identified as one of the most powerful and violent drug trafficking organizations in the world​.

The arrest and pending extradition of Tony Montana are expected to have significant implications for the CJNG, potentially disrupting their operations and weakening their influence both in Mexico and internationally. This development highlights ongoing international cooperation in combating drug trafficking and organized crime, aiming to hold key figures accountable for their roles in perpetuating violence and illegal activities.

(commercial at 6:07)

to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

A Cartel Boss Nicknamed ‘Tony Montana’ Was Just Arrested in Mexico (vice.com)

Allegations of corruption have increasingly surrounded President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) and his administration. Despite coming to power with a promise to combat corruption, multiple scandals have emerged, implicating both AMLO’s family and his political allies.

1. Campaign Financing by Drug Traffickers:
   • U.S. investigations revealed that AMLO's 2006 presidential campaign allegedly received significant financial support from drug traffickers. Informants claimed that AMLO's campaign promised to appoint law-enforcement officials favorable to traffickers in exchange for cash injections. This agreement purportedly included allowing traffickers to influence the selection of police commanders and the attorney general​​.
2. Family Involvement in Corruption:
   • Journalist Carlos Loret de Mola exposed several scandals involving AMLO’s relatives. His brother, Pío López Obrador, was caught on video accepting cash for AMLO’s political movement in 2015. Another scandal involved AMLO’s son, José Ramón López Beltrán, who was found living in a luxurious Houston apartment and maintaining close ties with a businessman benefiting from government contracts. Additionally, AMLO’s cousin, Felipa Obrador, was implicated in obtaining lucrative contracts from Pemex despite lacking relevant experience​​.
3. Tren Maya Contract Fraud:
   • New allegations surfaced about Gonzalo López Beltrán, another of AMLO’s sons, being involved in a contractor network accused of inflating prices for materials for the Tren Maya project. Verified audio recordings and documents suggested Gonzalo played a key role in steering contracts within this network. These allegations were part of a broader investigation named “El Clan” by Loret de Mola’s Latinus media outlet​.
4. Segalmex Scandal:
   • The Segalmex (Mexican Food Security Agency) scandal has been dubbed the most scandalous corruption case of AMLO’s tenure. This involved large-scale embezzlement within the agency, further tarnishing the administration’s anti-corruption image​.

(commercial at 11:12)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

https://mexiconewsdaily.com/news/narco-pact-sinaloa-cartel-and-morena/

In April 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice indicted the Chapitos, the sons of the notorious drug lord Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, alongside several associates, revealing significant insights into their operations and the broader activities of the Sinaloa Cartel. Here are some of the key revelations:

1. Leadership and Expansion: The Chapitos, identified as Iván Guzmán Salazar, Alfredo Guzmán Salazar, Joaquín Guzmán López, and Ovidio Guzmán López, assumed leadership roles within the Sinaloa Cartel following their father's extradition to the U.S. in 2017. They expanded the cartel's operations across multiple countries, including Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and several U.S. states, controlling large-scale drug trafficking networks​​.
2. Fentanyl Production: The indictments highlighted that the synthesis of fentanyl in Mexico began under the Chapitos' watch around 2014. This early start placed them at the forefront of the fentanyl crisis in the United States. The Chapitos reportedly sought to monopolize fentanyl production in Mexico, centralizing manufacturing in Sinaloa and operating numerous clandestine labs​​.
3. Innovative Trafficking Methods: The Chapitos utilized various sophisticated methods to transport drugs, including cargo aircraft, submarines, go-fast boats, and tunnels. They maintained a network of couriers and stash houses to facilitate the smuggling of fentanyl, cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine into the U.S.​
4. Violence and Intimidation: The Chapitos allegedly used violence and threats to consolidate their power within the Sinaloa Cartel. This included acts against rival factions and former allies, ensuring their dominance in the drug trafficking landscape​​.
5. International Precursor Supply Chain: The Chapitos managed a sophisticated supply chain for precursor chemicals, largely sourced from China. This network involved brokers and intermediaries, highlighting the global reach of their operations. Chinese chemical producers played a crucial role in supplying the necessary components for fentanyl production.

In this episode, we take another look at the sweeping indictments that were dropped directly into the laps of the Los Chapitos and their associates.  


(commercial at 13:26)
to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

5 Takeaways From US Indictments of Chapitos, Associates (insightcrime.org)

The first prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein in Florida has been widely criticized for several significant failings:

1. Lenient Plea Deal: Epstein was offered a highly lenient plea deal in 2008 by then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. Epstein pleaded guilty to two state charges of solicitation of prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution, avoiding more severe federal charges. This deal resulted in an 18-month sentence, of which he served only 13 months, largely on work release​]
2. Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA): The non-prosecution agreement granted Epstein and any potential co-conspirators immunity from federal prosecution. This prevented the broader network involved in Epstein's activities from being held accountable​.
3. Lack of Victim Notification: The victims were not informed of the plea deal until it was finalized, which violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. This failure to notify and involve the victims in the plea negotiation process denied them the opportunity to challenge the terms of the agreement​.
4. Grand Jury Manipulation: The grand jury proceedings in 2006 were allegedly manipulated to reduce the severity of the charges against Epstein. Despite evidence of serious offenses, the grand jury only indicted him on minor charges​ .
5. Influence and Power: Epstein's wealth and connections to influential figures are believed to have played a role in securing the lenient plea deal. His legal team’s aggressive tactics and high-profile connections potentially influenced the prosecutorial decisions​.

These factors combined to create what many have called a significant failure of the justice system, allowing Epstein to continue his criminal activities for many years after the initial investigation.


(commercial at 7:35)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Florida prosecutors blew Epstein trial by 'slut shaming' victims: lawyer (nypost.com)