In a recent episode of the popular podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski sat down with Joseph Scott Morgan, a Forensic Scientist and Distinguished Scholar of Applied Forensics at Jacksonville State University, to delve into the genealogical DNA evidence linking Brian Kohberger to a recent crime. The conversation peeled back the layers on the reliability of this cutting-edge forensic tool, challenging common beliefs while addressing some of the most pressing questions.
 
As Brueski puts it, the use of genealogical DNA in criminal investigations has many heralding it as "golden" evidence. "Some people say this is super solid. You can't really argue it," he noted. Yet, the actual value and validity of this technique is being contested, especially in legal arenas. As attorneys begin to challenge the method, the question arises: just how valuable is this type of evidence?
 
Morgan, taking a scientific stance, was keen to distinguish between the reliability of the science itself and the procedures around collecting samples. "It's proven science," he asserted, "The science itself is pretty rock solid when compared to some other practices within forensic science." His emphasis lies in the belief that while questions may arise regarding the provenance of samples, the genealogical DNA science stands unassailable.
 
The strength of genealogical DNA as evidence becomes even more evident when one considers its implications. As Morgan describes it, "it is almost as if distant cousins are pointing at you accusingly." The interconnectedness of lineage reveals relationships, hinting at culpability in ways that other forensic techniques can't.
 
However, Morgan acknowledges the possibility of errors, but downplays their likelihood. He explained that even if there were another match, "it would have to be someone else within [Kohberger's] familial line." The astronomical odds stacked against finding a match outside the familial connection makes this type of evidence compelling in the eyes of the court. He went on to highlight that this isn't a fragile forensic practice like bite mark evidence, which has lost credibility over time. With genealogical DNA, the defense faces an uphill battle.
 
The discussion then veered into a perplexing angle of Kohberger's case: his unexpected move from Pennsylvania to Washington State University (WSU) for his studies. Despite residing in a state boasting multiple prestigious Ph.D. programs in criminology, Kohberger chose WSU. Morgan, drawing from his academic background, explained that PhD aspirants typically select institutions based on specific faculty members whose interests align with their own. In Kohberger's case, it was Katherine Sland, a renowned scholar who penned a book on the BTK killer.
 
Though Brueski hinted at a possible correlation between Kohberger's interests and Sland's expertise, Morgan veered the conversation back to the victims. He stressed the importance of understanding any potential connection between Kohberger and the individuals from the crime scene. Was it a chance encounter, or was there a deeper, possibly sinister reason behind Kohberger's choice of location and university?
 
The podcast episode illuminated the intricate web of factors that investigators and prosecutors consider when building a case. It also underscored the increasing importance of genealogical DNA as a forensic tool. While questions remain in Kohberger's case, one thing is clear: as science advances, so does the criminal justice system's ability to unveil the truth.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski joined forces with psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott to delve into the perplexing case of Bryan Kohberger. The conversation sought to unravel the psyche of Kohberger amidst a cloud of allegations and questionable actions.
 
Brueski kicked off the dialogue, highlighting the contradictions in Kohberger's behavior. "Initially, their team [said], we're looking forward to being exonerated. Then it just kept going. Then he has an alibi," Brueski said, expressing skepticism about the strength of Kohberger's alibi which consisted of him just driving around.
 
Brueski further mused about the influence Kohberger seems to be exerting over his attorney, Ann Taylor. The defense strategy seemed "very odd," and not "in the control" of the attorney. He speculated, "I feel like he's calling some of the shots here and I feel like Ann Taylor is almost being held hostage."
 
Shavaun Scott proposed that it might be a calculated legal strategy, though it certainly seemed "passive." She suggested that the lawyers might be doing the best they can with the evidence they have.
 
A significant point of discussion was Kohberger's decision to return to the alleged crime scene, a behavior identified through phone pings the day after the incident. Scott explained, "Part of the fascination with serial killers returning to the crime scene, is that going back... gives them, again, a sense of control, a sense of power, and a sense of pleasure." She further highlighted the habitual nature of offenders to revisit the scene, either physically or through memorabilia and news articles, to relive their "pleasure."
 
Brueski raised an intriguing point about the geographical proximity of the crime to Kohberger's residence. "Was that something that is intentional because then he gets to soak up all of the attention?" he asked.
 
Scott confirmed that there's a trend of revisiting, and that it made sense Kohberger would choose a location close to his home, yet not directly on his own turf. "And it wasn't as if he killed someone on his own campus... he really fixated on these young women," she remarked.
 
However, the most pressing question on Brueski's mind was how Kohlberg's interactions with his defense, especially his statement about looking forward to being exonerated, reflected on his psychological state. In response, Scott suggested, "My guess is that's all legal maneuvering."
 
She emphasized that Kohberger isn't delusional in the traditional sense. "He knows he did it," she claimed, hinting at the existing evidence and weak alibi. In her professional opinion, Scott concluded that Kohberger isn’t suffering from multiple personalities or any classic signs of delusions. "He's not crazy. So, I think it's just, you know, what does a guilty person do very often the first thing they say is, I didn't do it."
 
As the episode wrapped, listeners were left with a clearer, albeit still enigmatic, understanding of Bryan Kohberger's psychology. Both Brueski and Scott presented compelling insights into the behavior of alleged criminals, emphasizing that while understanding may be reached, full comprehension remains elusive. Kohberger has pled not guilty to all charges. 
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a riveting episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delved into the mysteries surrounding Kohberger’s decision to study in Pullman, Washington, with Forensic Scientist and Distinguished Scholar of Applied Forensics at Jacksonville State University Joseph Scott Morgan.
 
Their conversation began with Brueski's questioning the peculiar choice of Pullman for Kohberger's education. Morgan speculated that answers might soon surface from the forensic analysis of Kohberger's digital devices, revealing potential premeditated tracking or stalking of the victims.
 
Morgan commented, "I think that it's going to be a treasure trove more than likely." He emphasized the importance of physical evidence in his work but showed equal enthusiasm for the discoveries digital forensics might offer.
 
Brueski recalled media footage that highlighted the seizure of a tower computer from Kohberger's residence, wondering about Kohberger's activities during the late hours. The focus, Morgan noted, shouldn't be on message boards but rather on search histories. These could provide a comprehensive understanding of Kohberger's intentions and actions leading up to the alleged crime.
 
Interestingly, Morgan made it clear that despite speculations, Kohberger was no "criminal mastermind from a forensic standpoint," essentially only as educated as one might be from watching YouTube videos. This statement perhaps sought to highlight the significant difference between actual forensic expertise and superficial knowledge from online sources.
 
Brueski then shifted the conversation towards Kohberger's alibi, sarcastically noting its predictability: driving around at night. The major evidence against this alibi is the cell phone triangulation data, which placed Kohberger at the crime scene.
 
Morgan elaborated on the accuracy of cell phone data, noting its terrifying precision, "everywhere we go, we are tracked." The data essentially serves as the "DNA of the phone," he mused, pointing out its undeniable reliability in linking individuals to specific locations.
 
With Kohberger's defense arguing that he frequently drove that route as a night owl and PhD student looking to clear his mind, the prosecution faces the challenge of proving that on the particular night in question, something was different. This might be where the fact that Kohberger's cell phone is connected to the victim's Wi-Fi becomes pivotal.
 
"If he is following this same route that ends up going by the house... Does that show more likely that he did this?" pondered Brueski.
 
Morgan suggested that the "totality of circumstances" would be a central argument. The prosecution would need to combine various pieces of evidence to paint a convincing picture of Kohberger's guilt, while the defense would try to poke holes in their narrative.
 
The podcast episode hinted at an intense legal battle ahead, especially concerning electronic evidence. Apart from the triangulation data, Kohberger's digital searches, social media interactions, and potential aliases would be under scrutiny.
 
Morgan concluded with a profound thought on the complexity of the case, especially in the realm of electronics, suggesting it would be an area of contention. He stated, "There's so many different ways, Tony, that we can go in this particular circumstance, just in this one area of electronics, that it's a bit overwhelming."
 
This gripping episode sheds light on the modern challenges and intricacies of forensic investigation, making it clear that in the digital age, our electronic footprints might speak louder than any other evidence.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The world of criminal investigation is not just about finding tangible evidence but also about diving deep into the behavioral patterns of suspects to uncover hidden intentions. A recent discussion on the podcast "Hidden Killers" hosted by Tony Brueski provided a compelling insight into the alibi presented by a suspect, Kohberger. Joined by retired FBI Special Agent and former Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, the conversation shed light on the intricacies of criminal behavior.
 
Kohberger's defense claims that he has an affinity for nighttime drives, an alibi that may initially sound benign. But Dreeke, with his extensive background in understanding human behavior, especially from his days of recruiting spies, found this revelation more than a little intriguing. "When I was looking for individuals to recruit," Dreeke elaborated, "the ones that you never suspected would ever betray their country... established a pattern of behavior in their lives... They designed by their daily habits a time gap that they could then substitute something nefarious in."
 
Drawing parallels, Dreeke noted that Kohberger might have been using this 'night drive' routine to embed potential illicit activities within an established pattern of behavior. By doing so, any suspicious activities would appear less conspicuous, seamlessly blending into his normal routine. The trick, Dreeke suggested, is that "bad guys" frequently "establish a pattern of behavior for their alibi," allowing them to hide crimes within activities they routinely undertake.
 
The conversation then veered towards whether this 'night drive' alibi was a premeditated strategy on Kohberger's part or a hastily constructed excuse. Brueski questioned its validity: "Do you think this is the alibi he legitimately planned on giving?" Dreeke, while cautioning that he was speculating, surmised that Kohberger's alibi might stem from a misguided "science experiment on how to be a serial killer." He further conjectured that Kohberger might have come across strategies "about how to hide in plain sight" from some reading, attempting to apply it in real life but failing when confronted with the complexities of reality.
 
 The debate didn't end there. Anne Taylor, Kohberger's attorney, was under scrutiny as well. Her strategy—or apparent lack thereof—came under the spotlight, with Brueski wondering aloud if she was "almost being held hostage" by her client's directives. The discourse raised questions about the dynamics between defense attorneys and their clients. Dreeke speculated about the possibility of Taylor being fed a narrative by Kohberger based on ideas he may have read somewhere about crafting the perfect alibi.
 
Both Brueski and Dreeke seemed perplexed by the seemingly weak defense strategy. They touched upon other instances where defense attorneys, despite their expertise, seemed to be "taking more direction from their clients than they should be." The balance between client collaboration and legal advice is a delicate one, but the consensus seemed to be that defense attorneys shouldn't be overshadowed or directed by their clients, especially if the client's perspective is skewed.
 
In sum, the conversation on "Hidden Killers" offered a riveting exploration into the complexities of criminal behavior and defense strategies. Through the lens of Kohberger's 'night drive' alibi, listeners were invited to delve deep into the psychological nuances of crime, alibis, and the attorney-client dynamic. Whether Kohberger's alibi stands the test of the investigation remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: in the world of crime and investigation, things are rarely as simple as they seem.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski had an engaging discussion with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke. The subject of their conversation? The defense strategy of Anne Taylor, attorney for Brian Kohberger.
 
Tony Brueski kicked off the conversation, commenting on the curious trend where people with limited or no expertise in a given field seem to be more confident in challenging experts than ever before. As he put it, "It seems to be a very bizarre thing we have right now where expert opinion doesn't really matter." This was framed within the context of Kohberger possibly influencing his own defense strategy despite lacking a legal background.
 
Dreeke weighed in on this societal shift, suggesting that the overriding of experts might be "more of a reflection of the mistrust of authority than anything else." This mistrust, he argued, could place undue pressure on professionals to bend to the whims of those who are less informed, lest they face accusations of incompetence or negligence.
 
One of the main points of contention is the decision by Anne Taylor to challenge cell phone data triangulation as a means to place Kohberger at the scene of the alleged crime. Brueski speculates, "They're gonna poke holes or… really show that [the triangulation] is not accurate."
 
In essence, if Taylor can create enough doubt around the cell phone data – which might place Kohberger near the scene – then the primary piece of physical evidence against him, a knife sheath, would stand alone. Dreeke shared this sentiment, emphasizing that Taylor's methodology might be to "plant reasonable doubt." He further noted that if there are inconsistencies in the cell phone data, even if they can be attributed to technology's inherent limitations, it might be enough to sway at least one juror.
 
 Dreeke alluded to the psychological aspect of this strategy. Drawing on Robert Green's "Laws of Human Nature", he points out that people often gravitate towards information that validates their own self-perception. If Taylor can tap into this human trait and make jurors feel uniquely perceptive or intelligent for doubting the accepted norm, she could foster a skepticism that benefits her client. "That's an effective strategy," Dreeke opined.
 
 While the duo jested that they might inadvertently be providing Taylor with more ammunition for her defense, they touched on a more profound point about the art of courtroom litigation. As Dreeke insightfully observed, courtroom lawyers, whether prosecutors or defenders, are storytellers. They must balance hard facts with the softer touch of emotion, weaving a narrative that resonates with jurors. For those like Taylor, who may be "light on facts and data", the onus is on them to lean into emotion and sentiment to tip the scales in their favor.
 
 In conclusion, as the legal proceedings in the Brian Kohberger case unfold, it serves as a potent reminder of the dynamic interplay between expertise and public opinion, fact and emotion, in our justice system. The implications of this balance could, as Dreeke and Brueski suggest, have far-reaching consequences for both the accused and the broader public's faith in the judicial process.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the renowned podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski had an illuminating conversation with Joni Johnston, a clinical and forensic psychologist & licensed private investigator. The focus was the complex and highly debated case against Brian Kohberger.
 
Kohberger's alibi, that he likes to drive at night, raised eyebrows and led many to question its credibility. As Johnston remarked, "The defense probably worked with what they had." The glaring concern remains: if Kohberger routinely drove at night, why would he turn off his phone, and how frequently did he do so? A crucial detail Johnston pointed out is that modern technology, specifically phone data, can offer insights into his driving patterns. "His phone should be able to tell everybody how often he was driving around at night and where he was driving to," she mentioned.
 
However, a pattern observed with Kohberger’s nightly drives has been problematic. The route he frequently took allegedly aligns with the vicinity of a house where four murders occurred. "It is a problem if you are a night wanderer only to a specific location," Johnston observed. It would be more believable if Kohberger’s alibi showed he drove to multiple locations consistently, as opposed to focusing mainly on one area.
 
Yet even with this defense, Brueski raised a pertinent point: "Even if they can establish a pattern of behavior here with other trends on his phone showing that yes, he does drive this route a lot at night, would that be positive or negative for him?" The key issue here is the speculation that Kohberger might have stalked the area before the murders.
 
Johnston also touched on the challenge the defense will face in trying to discredit cell phone triangulation, which pinpoints a person's location based on their phone's connection to cell towers. "Certainly that will be part of their testimony," Johnston noted. "They're gonna be having experts come on and talk about how inaccurate triangulation is, or the range that these towers can actually reach."
 
Beyond the alibi and location, Brueski and Johnston delved deeper into the psychological implications of the crimes. The victims were asleep when attacked, highlighting a choice in targeting the vulnerable. "Most people who commit premeditated murder are looking to either murder a vulnerable victim, or they're looking to find someone in a vulnerable position," Johnston explained. The audacity and confidence required to break into someone’s home and attack them in their sleep speak volumes about Kohberger’s state of mind.
 
Furthermore, there’s the perplexing decision of Kohberger to commit these alleged crimes away from his original residence in Pennsylvania, instead opting for the Washington and Idaho areas. This choice implies a deliberate effort to maintain a distance from familiar territory while still remaining in a recognizable setting. "I think it does Tony, in the sense that he would pick a place that was close enough to be familiar to him but wasn't too close where he would be noticed by people who knew him," explained Johnston.
 
Johnston's insights into the Kohberger case provided a deep dive into the psyche of an accused, the challenges faced by the defense, and the extensive role that technology plays in modern trials. As the case unfolds, it’s evident that the intersection of psychology, technology, and law will be integral in determining Kohberger's fate.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski dives deep into the upcoming trial of Brian Kohberger, where the role of expert witnesses has garnered significant attention. Former FBI Special Agent and daily contributor to "Hidden Killers," Jennifer Coffindaffer, shed light on the complexities of using expert witnesses, especially when they provide contrasting testimonies.
 
Brueski aptly pointed out the potential confusion a jury could face, saying, "You're going to have prosecution coming in with their own experts and... you'll have one set of experts saying this, and then you'll have another set that may say something different." Highlighting the challenge jurors might face in discerning which expert to believe.
 
Coffindaffer emphasized that when it comes to scientific matters, true experts should mostly align in their opinions because "the science speaks for itself." However, she acknowledges that interpretations can differ, especially in areas like cell phone record analysis or digital forensics, which can lead to discrepancies in testimonies.
 
Drawing attention to the "Berger case," Coffindaffer highlighted the role of an FBI special agent with unmatched expertise in the field. She stated, "This guy's expertise just is overwhelming compared to the others," emphasizing the weight his testimony might carry in the trial.
 
A significant revelation in the case has been Kohberger's official alibi - he likes to drive at night. Brueski questioned Coffindaffer on her reaction to this alibi, wondering if the defense lawyer, Anne Taylor, had a deeper strategy or was adhering to Kohberger's wishes. Coffindaffer opined that due to the overwhelming evidence suggesting Kohberger was driving around that night, the defense had no choice but to accept and incorporate it into their strategy. She said, "Because the evidence is so strong, that's what they had to go with."
 
The strategy, however, might not only be about contesting guilt. Brueski hypothesized two potential defense aims: to eliminate the death penalty or to plant a seed of doubt in at least one juror's mind. This strategy, referred to by Coffindaffer as "muddying the waters", involves presenting information in such a way that jurors might question the evidence, even if slightly.
 
Coffindaffer also stressed the importance of the DNA evidence, which was found on a sheet related to the case. "At the end of the day, DNA on that sheet should solve the riddle for all the jurors," she stated, suggesting its pivotal role in the trial's outcome.
 
In essence, the Kohberger trial brings the complexities surrounding using expert witnesses to the forefront. Contrasting testimonies, interpretations, and strategies highlight the challenges jurors face in sifting through the information to arrive at the truth. The episode of "Hidden Killers" provides an insightful overview of these intricacies, setting the stage for what promises to be a closely-watched trial.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the most recent episode of "Hidden Killers", podcast host Tony Brueski delved into the controversial and perplexing case of Brian Kohberger, alongside Forensic Psychologist Kate Wallinga. Their discourse revolved around the veracity of Kohberger's alibi and how its evolution seems more perplexing than convincing.
 
Brueski opened the discussion with a tone of bemusement, pointing out the seemingly desperate strategy of Kohberger's defense. "Just throwing randomness into the air is what it feels like. Lately, things that are not based on any sort of fact – claims that are not based in reality, really is what we're talking about here." He emphasized the audacity of the alibi, remarking on the defendant's claim, "Hey, I like to drive at night." A claim made in the face of evidence placing him at the crime scene.
 
Kate Wallinga chimed in with her perspective on the defendant's mindset. "I think he's probably thinking that well, they can't prove a negative. You know, they can't prove I wasn't doing something… but he's starting to sound like a clown by this point." Wallinga's insight into the psyche of Kohberger portrayed a man with inflated confidence in his intelligence, a trait she found all too common in many inmates.
 
The conversation took another intriguing turn when Brueski posed a critical question about Kohberger's attorney, Ann Taylor. He wondered aloud about the source of the defense's seemingly erratic strategy, asking, "What I'm wondering is the attorney, Ann Taylor... How many of these statements do you think are coming from her direction and expertise versus it's the client?"
 
Wallinga, drawing from her familiarity with defense attorneys, posited that Taylor would likely prefer silence at this juncture. "Because anything that she says, whether it's in a deposition or whether it's at a press conference, that becomes fodder for the actual trial," Wallinga pointed out. She highlighted the dangers of being locked into a story before a trial, an angle that could potentially be exploited by the prosecution.
 
Wallinga's conjecture paints Kohberger as a forceful figure, perhaps directing his lawyer's hand. "He strikes me as the type to say, well, if you don't do it, I'll find somebody else who will. You know, I'll write a letter to the news media, or I'll make a phone call." Wallinga said. Adding another layer, she also touched upon Kohberger's study of criminology, emphasizing how it diverges greatly from forensic psychology and law, and how he might be grappling with this realization.
 
Brueski, taking the speculation further, contemplated whether Taylor was being manipulated to some extent by Kohberger. He queried, "Is she being held hostage to a certain extent… She's just kind of like, okay you hang yourself if you want." He considered the possibility of an overarching strategy aimed at the cell phone data, seeking to introduce reasonable doubt by poking holes in its accuracy. He noted the paradoxical nature of the alibi, one that simultaneously sounds "ridiculous" but also potentially weakens the cell phone evidence.
 
Echoing Brueski's sentiments, Wallinga suggested that the defense might be strategically attempting to cut down on the trial's length. She detailed the tedious nature of cell phone data, explaining, "Those of us who watch Dateline or forensics files, we're like, oh yeah. Cell phone tower data, no big deal. But the reality is, in a courtroom, you have to comb through it and be very precise."
 
In closing, Wallinga summarized the situation aptly: "He's a smart guy who sounds stupid." She alluded to the common fallacy where individuals, although experts in one area, fail to recognize the complexities and nuances of another.
 
As the Brian Kohberger case unfolds, the podcast discussion highlighted the fascinating interplay between law, psychology, and strategy and how even the most seemingly 'ridiculous' claims can have profound implications in the courtroom.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As the small college town of Idaho grapples with the haunting memories of a quadruple homicide, the spotlight shifts to a significant courtroom proceeding. This Thursday, Bryan Kohberger, the central accused in the case, will stand before an Idaho judge, seeking a dismissal of his indictment. With the weight of four young lives hanging in the balance, the arguments set forth by his defense team could make or break the trajectory of this trial.
 
Bryan Kohberger's indictment paints a grim image – a doctoral student allegedly using a hunting knife to end the lives of four University of Idaho students in an off-campus residence. Yet, as per documents accessed by RadarOnline.com, Kohberger's defense led by the assertive attorney, Anne C. Taylor, is poised to challenge this narrative at its very foundation.
 
The Crux of the Defense's Argument

At the heart of the defense's claim is an accusation that the grand jury process was fundamentally flawed. Taylor contends that the jury, responsible for charging Kohberger was "misled as to the standard of proof required for an indictment." Such an allegation, if substantiated, can have profound implications on the legitimacy of the proceedings.
 
Moreover, the defense has spotlighted an alleged mishandling of the grand jury selection process. Taylor claims that Latah County prosecutors unduly limited the pool of prospective jurors exposed to the evidence. She emphasizes that such limitations might have inadvertently affected the outcome of the jury selection and, by extension, the indictment. Furthermore, Taylor alludes to other unspecified "irregularities" in the grand jury process, suggesting a more intricate web of issues that demand investigation.
 
Location, DNA, and the Quest for Truth
 
An essential facet of Kohberger's defense hinges on his whereabouts during the ill-fated night. While the defense team has kept the specifics under wraps, they are emphatic about Kohberger being "at a location other than the King Road address" when the gruesome incident transpired. Such a claim, if validated, could dismantle the prosecution's narrative.
 
The DNA evidence, arguably the most crucial piece linking Kohberger to the crime, is under intense scrutiny. With the forensic link hinging on a hunting knife sheath reportedly bearing Kohberger's DNA, Taylor is leaving no stone unturned. Thursday’s hearing will serve as a platform for Taylor’s pressing motion to gain access to all communication and documentation pertinent to the DNA analysis. This includes extensive correspondence between detectives and forensic experts, alongside comprehensive reports from labs involved in the DNA evaluation. Notably, Taylor's request also extends to data where ‘unknown’ male profiles were identified, indicating a strategy to contest the exclusivity of the DNA match.
 
Looking Ahead
 
As the date for Kohberger's trial looms closer in October, the defense's arguments raise pivotal questions. If these allegations bear weight, they could radically alter the course of the trial. It is a stark reminder that while the quest for justice is paramount, the sanctity of the judicial process is equally critical. As the community seeks closure, Thursday's hearing will undoubtedly be a watershed moment in this heart-wrenching saga.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The case surrounding Bryan Kohberger's alleged involvement in the Idaho quadruple homicide continues to captivate the nation. In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers" hosted by Tony Brueski, attorney and former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani shared some insights into the intricacies of Kohberger's defense and the larger strategies at play.
 
Rahmani started the discussion, highlighting the alibi defense proposed by Kohberger's lawyer, Anne C. Taylor. "I like to go driving at night,” Kohberger claimed. This statement raised eyebrows, with both the podcast host and Rahmani expressing skepticism over its merit. While Taylor's record in handling complex cases remains commendable, some of the defense's statements and alibis have been deemed "borderline crazy."
 
Rahmani mused, “I don't think this is a real alibi where someone's gonna testify that Bryan Kohberger was with me on the night of the murders.” Instead, the defense's strategy appears to focus on cross-examining the state's evidence, particularly the cell site data.
 
According to the evidence presented, Kohberger's cell phone signal was traced from Washington State to Idaho, stopping short of the victims' house. This led to speculations that Kohberger might have turned his phone off or left it at a location before purportedly committing the crime. Rahmani anticipates that the defense will argue the cell data is inconsistent with the surveillance evidence related to a Hyundai Elantra and posit that since Kohberger's phone wasn’t at the murder scene, he too wasn’t present.
 
Brueski then raised the pertinent question about the room for questioning the cell triangulation data. Rahmani, offering a prosecutorial perspective, opined that the cell phone evidence is remarkably precise. "It's very accurate," he asserted, highlighting that such data can trace a person's location within a few feet.
 
Despite the defense's arguments, Rahmani foresees the prosecution presenting a robust rebuttal. "They're really explaining away the defense's alibi before they've even presented their case," Rahmani noted. He expects the prosecution to stress that Kohberger, a PhD student well-versed in criminal justice and cell phone intricacies, had intentionally turned off his phone. Moreover, Rahmani hinted that even if Kohberger's phone wasn’t at the murder site on the night in question, it had pinged outside the house on multiple other occasions, suggesting a possible "stalking type theory."
 
But the motive for the brutal murders remains elusive. Although motive isn’t a legal requisite, Rahmani emphasized that juries often seek answers to the “why” behind heinous crimes. Gleaning from the limited information available, Rahmani speculated that the prosecution might present a stalking angle, especially given certain unreplied Instagram messages and reports of Kohberger visiting a restaurant where two victims worked.
 
In essence, while the defense maneuvers to cast doubt on the cell data, the prosecution looks poised to address these gaps proactively and, possibly, suggest a motive grounded in obsession.
 
The Kohberger case, with its complexities and the grim nature of the crime, underscores the intricate dance between defense and prosecution. As the trial progresses, both sides will undoubtedly employ every tool and tactic to present their narratives, with truth-seeking as the ultimate objective.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the esteemed podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski sat down with former Federal prosecutor and attorney Neama Rahmani to delve into the captivating case against Brian Kohberger. With both bringing a unique perspective, the conversation was rife with analysis, questions, and insight into the case's evidence, which is currently shielded by a gag order.
 
The overarching question is, given the current knowledge, how will the defense handle character testimonies from Kohberger's acquaintances? Rahmani speculates, “They're going to try to keep a lot of that, and what we've seen. The defense in this case... It's going to be two-tiered. They're going to focus on the jury... Oftentimes, they're really looking at those appellate courts, especially in a death penalty case."
 
Kohberger, as described, doesn’t seem to be a social butterfly. So, the approach to introducing character witnesses can be a double-edged sword. Rahmani cautioned about the pitfalls, stating, "that prior bad acts, evidence 404B character evidence, that's something that appellate courts really take a close look at." The prosecution might be wary of leaning too heavily on character witnesses for fear of later appeals.

Regarding the evidence, Brueski brought up the concerning lack of multiple DNAs at the crime scene. Rahmani chimed in, "For a crime scene that's been so gruesome and horrific and bloody, you'd expect there to be a lot more DNA than just one single source in a knife sheath."
 
A significant portion of the discussion hovered around Kohberger’s phone records. With potential evidence pointing toward stalking, Brueski ponders the information to be unveiled during the trial. "Are we going to be blown away by information? Is there going to be a treasure trove of planning, of images of stalking on that device?"
 
Rahmani responded, "Even though there is that broad gag order, this is the biggest case in the country right now... if there was that smoking gun, I would've thought that maybe someone would've reported it because there's so much coverage of this case."
 
In terms of ensuring impartiality for the upcoming trial in a small town, Rahmani brings up the omnipresence of social media. "Everyone in the world has heard about this case," he asserts, making the selection of an unbiased jury increasingly challenging. "Is the defense going to try to challenge the venue, get things moved? We saw this happen with Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow, the other big Idaho case." Rahmani pointed out the challenges faced in the Chauvin-Floyd case, suggesting that, like in that situation, jury selection for Kohberger's trial could span days, if not weeks.
 
In conclusion, as the case against Brian Kohberger progresses, new revelations and strategies continue to emerge, painting a clearer picture for the public. Rahmani's insights, combined with Brueski's probing questions, offer a unique and thought-provoking exploration of what's currently known about the case, and what might come next. Only time will tell how the trial unfolds, but with the world watching, the search for justice is palpable.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the well-regarded podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski sat down with Shavaun Scott, a psychotherapist and author, to delve into the intricacies of the case against Brian Kohberger. Their discussion touched upon the defense's tactics, the science behind the evidence, and Kohberger's behavioral traits.
 
The defense's claim of "phantom matches" in DNA evidence is a contentious point in the case. Leah Larkin, a DNA expert hired by the defense, argued the possibility of errors despite the astronomically low odds. Brueski pointed out that, with odds like "one in 5.37 octillion," the likelihood of it being a proper match is staggeringly high. "What is their goal? Simply to confuse and make people think that the science is not anywhere near as solid as it actually is," Brueski postulated.
 
Shavaun Scott commented, "The circumstantial evidence is so high with this case...it doesn't make a lot of sense and it just strikes me as desperate." In relation to Kohberger's alibi, Brueski highlighted its fragility. Kohberger's defense is that he frequently drove around at night, which Scott noted could be seen as a "red flag" for potential serial killer behavior. The fact that Kohberger cannot definitively account for his whereabouts on the night of the murders, coupled with the timing of his phone being turned off and on near the crime scene, casts further doubt on his alibi.
 
As for the defense's strategy, Scott believes they're simply "trying to think up what else [they] can throw out." There have also been attempts to subpoena information about officers involved in the investigation, hinting at a possible defense angle of "tunnel vision." Brueski asked if there's any merit to this claim, to which Scott responded, "I just don't see it." She elaborated that defense attorneys sometimes dig into officers' pasts in an attempt to discredit them, but in this case, the arguments aren't compelling.
 
Scott also touched upon the subject of Kohberger's psychological profile. She stated that from descriptions and interviews, Kohberger appears as an "odd duck" who had social problems, especially with women, and exhibited traits like arrogance. "The consistent theme that comes through is this... drive to dominate women and interact with women in strange ways," she said. Regarding potential links to serial killers, Scott mentioned narcissism and a lack of empathy as common traits. However, whether Kohberger fits a sadistic profile remains uncertain, pending evidence like computer search histories.
 
Brueski also inquired about Kohberger's teenage writings, which touched upon dissociative phenomena. Scott had reviewed these and felt they portrayed Kohberger as someone trying to appear smarter by using jargon, even if incorrectly. "He knows he is different, but he didn't know why," Scott noted.
 
The case continues to draw attention due to its high-profile nature and the controversial tactics employed by the defense. As it stands, many questions remain unanswered. With Scott's expert insights and Brueski's probing questions, the "Hidden Killers" episode provided listeners with a comprehensive understanding of where the case stands.
 
While the court's decision is pending, the discussions and speculations continue to keep the public captivated. The integrity of forensic science, the strategies of the defense, and the psychology of the accused all interplay in this riveting case.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delved into a chilling exploration of the mind of a killer with psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott. The conversation revolved around the mystifying reasons individuals might commit heinous acts, particularly in the context of sexual domination.
 
“Have there been cases where people who've committed something this heinous? 'cause everyone looks at us and goes, how did they go in there and kill four people that quickly?” Tony asked. The intriguing possibility of someone being in a dissociative state while committing a crime was discussed. Could someone commit murder without retaining a memory of the act?

“I don’t think it typically works that way,” Scott replied. "Even when they're in a dissociative state, it's not like a full-blown, multiple personality disorder kind of thing where one part of them comes out and does something and the other part doesn't know.”
 
She clarified that even in cases of dissociation, it's more about a change in mood rather than a complete loss of awareness. The conversation shifted to understanding the sexual motivation behind certain types of killers. According to Scott, for some, violence is erotic. “The violence is the erotic part and it's generally something that they have been rehearsing in their mind for years and years before they engage in it.”
 
With the myriad of explicit content available on the internet, Tony wondered, “Why do people go to these sorts of lengths to get that sort of satisfaction or sexual satisfaction out of something like this?” Scott offered that the rarity of these individuals is due to a combination of factors, one of them being differences in the brain that pushes them to seek thrills and lack empathy. "There are differences in their need for thrills. There are differences in their lack of, you know, the brain that causes them to not have compassion or empathy for other people," she explained.
 
The current digital age, replete with a plethora of explicit content, poses another question: does the sheer volume and availability of such material deter individuals from acting out violent fantasies, or does it exacerbate them? Scott believes the latter is the concern. Based on her experience working with rapists and sex offenders, she found that indulgence in sadistic porn intensifies their fantasies, making them more likely to act on them.

Moreover, the availability and accidental access to explicit content by children pose alarming threats to their developing minds. "One of my greatest concerns with kids is that I have seen seven and eight-year-old boys in therapy who are already into this material that they've stumbled into online," Scott shared.
 
When children's understanding of sexuality is built around violence and cruelty, a lack of empathy and arousal can shape a potentially dangerous mentality. It's a pressing issue that society needs to address with urgency.
 
The episode not only sheds light on the intricacies of the human mind but also emphasizes the need for society to be more proactive in understanding and combating the factors that might lead individuals down dark paths. In the ever-evolving digital age, the conversation initiated by Tony Brueski and Shavaun Scott serves as a wake-up call to monitor, manage, and mitigate the impacts of explicit content, especially on the young and impressionable.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski sat down with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, to dissect the ongoing defense tactics surrounding Brian Kohberger.
 
Brueski started the segment commenting on Kohberger's defense strategy, noting the repeated delays and use of seemingly fabricated terms. He humorously remarked, "It seems like the Kohberger strategy of his defense lately has been make things up. Stall, make up things, install and make up some more things." One of these terms, "phantom matches", piqued Brueski's interest, prompting him to do his own research on its prevalence and significance outside the confines of this case. While the term did exist, Brueski struggled to find substantial reference to it elsewhere.
 
Dreeke commended Ann Taylor and her defense team for inventively crafting a term that might make potential jurors doubt the prosecution's case. The primary goal appears to be creating uncertainty regarding DNA evidence, despite the incredibly low probability of a phantom match, estimated to be around a 1 in 5.37 octillion chance. He explained, "This is what you're supposed to be doing. You sowed seeds of doubt. And it sounds like she's collecting she wants these massive disclosure lists of all these people, of all the tests."
 
The discussion soon shifted to expert witnesses. With DNA evidence and phantom matches at the forefront of the defense strategy, the qualifications and credibility of these experts are under scrutiny. Dreeke voiced concerns about the legitimacy of some experts, suggesting that having a degree or prior experience doesn't necessarily equate to expertise in the case's specific context. He said, "Do they have experience doing that? And does then the cross-examinee nation have the ability to refute it, to refute their behaviors?"
 
The theatrical aspect of courtroom proceedings wasn't lost on either Brueski or Dreeke. The latter remarked, "The courtroom drama. That's reason why they call it courtroom drama. And that's because it comes down to, it's a show."
 
However, perhaps the most salient point of their discussion revolved around the jury. Given the high-profile nature of the Kohberger case, especially in Moscow, Idaho, finding impartial jurors might prove challenging. Brueski expressed doubts about potential jurors' obliviousness: "Is that a good thing that that one had been removed so far from one of the biggest murder cases in the State's history in a small town to, to be a juror? Does that not almost show, you know, almost a lack of something?"
 
Dreeke acknowledged this, highlighting the challenges in finding completely uninformed jurors. The ideal juror, in his view, would be one who could remain dispassionate and heed the judge's instructions. He concluded, "Just because someone is found not guilty, doesn't mean they're innocent."
 
With defense tactics in full swing, and the role of expert witnesses and jurors under debate, the Kohberger trial underscores the complexities and intricacies of high-profile courtroom battles. As the case unfolds, the legal community and the public alike await its resolution with bated breath.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Tony Brueski delves deep into the ongoing Brian Kohberger case in the latest episode. Joined by psychologist Dr. John Delatorre, the duo scrutinized the stall tactics seemingly being used by Kohberger's defense team and questioned the potential impact of their pre-trial statements on the jury pool.
 
Brueski kicked off the discussion by questioning the delay tactics being employed by Kohberger's defense, attempting to decipher their strategies. "We're talking about a lot of delay tactics, stall tactics, all those sort of things. Seemingly being employed by the defense right now to buy more time. Would you agree?"
 
Dr. Delatorre provided an illuminating perspective on the behind-the-scenes workings of such trials, stating, "This is all part of trial tactics. This is the stuff that you don't see on television... if you're the defendant, I don't want a speedy trial. I want to make sure that the prosecution has crossed all of its T's and dotted all of its i's."
 
Kohberger's defense has garnered attention for floating points, seemingly targeting a potential jury pool even before the trial has begun. The defense's enlistment of Dr. Leah Larkin, who has underscored the imperfection of genetic genealogy, has added a layer of intrigue. According to Brueski, despite there being a remote chance of error in genetic studies, the defense's narrative has swerved towards terms like "phantom matches," possibly aiming to sow seeds of doubt.
 
Delatorre highlighted a pertinent issue: "The problem that we have with juries nowadays is that they've all grown up watching CSI. They've all grown up with this idea that if there is direct physical blood, DNA... then it automatically means that whoever it matches to, that's your guy."
 
The psychologist further opined that the defense may not necessarily be aiming for a not-guilty verdict but a lessened punishment, stating, "Maybe they're anticipating finding guilt, but just get the lowest amount of punishment that they can."
 
Brueski further probed the topic of Kohberger's memory. The accused's silent demeanor throughout the hearings has led some to wonder if he might be experiencing cognitive dissonance or dissociation, perhaps having no recollection of the alleged crime. However, Delatorre expressed skepticism, explaining, "I can't see it because let's say he is on this mission. Well, how are you going to know that you've actually completed the mission if you don't have any recollection of it?"
 
The psychologist posited that the perpetrator of such a crime would likely savor the memory, possibly as a "pseudo trophy" if no physical objects were taken. "Whoever did this, most likely enjoyed doing it. And most likely has a fond recollection," Delatorre added.
 
 Brueski and Delatorre's in-depth analysis paints a vivid picture of the complexities surrounding the Kohberger case. As the trial continues to unfold, only time will tell how the defense's strategies and the potential influence of pretrial publicity will impact the final verdict.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Brian Kohberger trial has seen a new twist in its tale, as the defense prepares to challenge the DNA evidence that may incriminate Kohberger. In the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers", Tony Brueski spoke with former Felony Prosecutor and attorney, Eric Faddis, shedding light on the defense’s strategy and the risks it presents.


Brueski started the episode discussing a new motion, an attempt to "compel the defense to persuade prosecutors to share various evidence," specifically surrounding DNA testing. Faddis pointed out that, at this juncture, the DNA evidence "could be terribly problematic for Kohlberg." He mentioned a potential reconsideration by the prosecution on using some of the genetic genealogy evidence. "All of this is gonna come down on Friday. We're gonna know a lot more then."


The podcast discussed the key idea of "false positives" in DNA evidence. To the general public, the term can be misleading. "If there is anything that, like you said, any errors, any faultiness, but when it comes down to a false positive with DNA...the odds of that are slim to almost nothing whatsoever with the type of DNA they're testing," Brueski stated. He continued with an analogy, explaining that even if a key (representing DNA) is mishandled or gets dirty, it still opens the right door, indicating the DNA remains unchanged despite potential mishandling.


Faddis brought a new perspective, suggesting that Kohberger’s defense might attempt to claim the DNA was planted, an accusation that would dramatically alter the course of the trial. If the defense could highlight any faults in the testing, it could strengthen their argument against the evidence's reliability. "If they're gonna try to use all of the... alleged faultiness in the testing to support a larger theory that this DNA evidence was planted," Faddis hypothesized.


Taking the stance that the evidence was planted is significantly risky for the defense. Faddis clarified that such an argument is a double-edged sword. "That's a super risky argument to take," he said, "If you're gonna put that in front of a jury as a defense attorney, you better be able to back it up." Arguing that evidence was planted inherently suggests that the DNA was, in fact, from the client, thus removing the argument about testing reliability.


Brueski pondered on the implications, "How risky is it to go down that road? ...to go down that road, is there a lot of risk involved to make such a claim?" Faddis responded with a resounding, "Oh heck yes." Arguing the DNA was planted implies not just that the evidence was mishandled but that there was a deliberate attempt to frame Kohberger.


"It's a pretty tall accusation to make if you can't back it up," Faddis said, "and also that accusation... divests you of one additional argument." He emphasized the gravity of such a claim and the need for a competent attorney to carry it forward.


The debate surrounding the DNA evidence, whether it's about its validity or potential mishandling, has added another layer of complexity to the Brian Kohberger case. As the motion to compel unfolds, all eyes will be on the courtroom to see how the defense navigates these treacherous waters and the direction the trial takes in the coming weeks.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the recent installment of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski delved deep into the Brian Kohberger case, exploring the twists and turns related to the defense motions argued on Friday. These motions are tied to the defense's request for the state to disclose specific DNA profiles, a potentially groundbreaking turn in the case. Offering expert insight on the topic was former FBI Special Agent and daily contributor to "Hidden Killers," Jennifer Coffindaffer.
 
 Brueski started by highlighting the implications of the defense's request, both if granted or denied. On this topic, Coffindaffer remarked, "If the defense is allowed access to all of those profiles, they are going to try to show that those profiles actually lined up at some point in some way with what was on the sheath." She added, "I think that they'll just try to muddy the waters with all of that." The term "phantom matches" was mentioned, which, as Coffindaffer suggested, might sound alarming to laymen but may just be a strategy "to confuse and try and poke holes."
 
 But Coffindaffer was keen to place emphasis on the real evidence at hand. "At the end of the day, even if they try to tangent off that there is a DNA match with somebody else... They cannot overcome the fact that his DNA, Brian Kohberger's, is on that sheath," she stated.
 
 In the midst of this DNA tug-of-war, a concern of violating individual privacy arises. Coffindaffer pointed out that granting the defense's request could lead to a massive privacy breach for all those individuals whose profiles might be turned over. However, this must be balanced against the defendant's rights. "He's got to balance that with shouldn't they get everything? Shouldn't the defense be able to look at every single profile?" she pondered.
 
 The idea of complete transparency in such cases was also discussed, with Coffindaffer highlighting the federal process she was familiar with, known as open discovery. "We always did what we called open discovery," she shared, explaining that this meant laying out the entire case for the defense, thereby allowing them to examine every piece of evidence. In her opinion, it's better to "disclose everything" rather than risk appeals based on a lack of access to material evidence. "Give them the kitchen sink, let them go down these rabbit trails," Coffindaffer advocated, emphasizing that it's the most ethical way to handle such cases.
 
 Tony Brueski concurred with this view, pointing out the risk if the judge denies the motion. "Isn't it a kind of a risky thing if the judge denies this motion, especially in appeals, if Kohberger is to be found guilty?" he queried. "Should they not have access to all the material the prosecution has as they would in discovery?"
 
 The Kohberger case is shaping up to be a landmark one, challenging traditional norms and pushing the boundaries of legal procedures in DNA-related cases. The decision of whether or not to disclose the DNA profiles could either pave a new path for defense strategies or reinforce the importance of full transparency in such high-profile trials. What remains certain is that the outcome of this case will have far-reaching implications for future legal proceedings involving DNA evidence.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The most recent episode of "Hidden Killers" podcast, hosted by Tony Brueski, delved deep into the controversial DNA profiling issues in the case against Brian Kohberger. The central point of the discussion revolved around a motion filed on behalf of Kohberger's defense, demanding the state to disclose the DNA profiles used in the investigation. Bob Motta, a veteran defense attorney and host of the "Defense Diaries" podcast, was on hand to shed light on this intricate legal battle.
 
 Motta began by affirming, "Now, obviously I'm a defense attorney. So I'm a bit biased in that and I've been in these battles with the state for 20 plus years in terms of what they're gonna turn over or what they're not going to turn over." He highlighted the state's stance: that since they now possess Kohberger's buccal swab and profile, the DNA in question would not be introduced at the trial. The argument thus stands - why would the defense need it?
 
 The DNA at the heart of the debate isn't just any regular genetic information, but genealogical DNA, which is employed to build familial trees from a profile, pinpointing potential offenders. Motta states, "You're talking about this family tree being built from a profile and that's how they're getting to all these offenders. It's, it's an incredible resource and tool for law enforcement." This tool has recently proved instrumental in solving cold cases and identifying missing individuals missing for decades.
 
 However, the ability of law enforcement agencies to access and utilize such data isn't without its detractors. A pivotal point Motta emphasized upon was the potential breach of the Fourth Amendment rights. The argument is nuanced; when genetic information is used to trace a family tree, it draws upon shared DNA across multiple generations. As Motta elucidated, "My Y S T R. Is shared with my father and my grandfather and my great-grandfather and everyone on the male line all the way down." Therefore, there's an argument to be made about individuals having a privacy interest in a third party's DNA because of this shared genetic lineage.
 
 The debate further deepens when considering the plethora of databases available. While law enforcement maintains databases like CODIS, private databases, such as Ancestry and 23andMe, exist wherein individuals can opt to allow law enforcement to use their DNA profiles. The lines blur when it comes to the use of profiles from individuals who haven't given explicit consent.
 
 Another contentious point highlighted by Motta was the weight given to the DNA evidence in determining Kohberger's proximity to the crime scene. In his words, "take that [DNA] piece out...and you're basically left with just a guy driving around." Without the DNA evidence linking Kohberger directly inside the house, the case stands on shakier grounds, depending solely on phone pings and location data.
 
 While Motta acknowledges the significant leaning of evidence towards guilt, he insists that any judgments should be reserved until after the trial, "After the evidence has been vetted. Otherwise, we're all just guessing."
 
 As the debate around genealogical DNA and its implications in the legal world intensifies, it's evident that this case might just be the beginning of a series of legal battles aiming to clarify the blurry lines around genetic privacy and Fourth Amendment rights. Only time will tell how these issues are resolved, but what's certain is that the outcome will have long-lasting implications on how criminal investigations are conducted in the future.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of the renowned podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski sat down with former FBI Special Agent and frequent contributor Jennifer Coffindaffer to delve deep into the controversial case against Brian Kohberger, specifically focusing on the DNA evidence and its implications.
 
Using an evocative analogy, Brueski likened DNA to a unique key, saying, "A key is unique to a specific lock. DNA is specific to a specific person, no matter who's handling that key." He emphasized that if it's the right key (or DNA match), it would open the door regardless of where the key has been or who handled it. In the case at hand, this metaphorical "key" raises questions about the validity and authenticity of the evidence against Kohberger.
 
Coffindaffer, drawing from her vast experience, expressed high regard for jury members, believing them to be insightful individuals who often see through superficial rhetoric to get to the crux of the case. She was of the opinion that, despite various speculations and doubts, "At the end of the day, these facts are going to stick." One of the most discussed points was the allegation that the key (DNA) might have been planted. Coffindaffer dismissed this, arguing about the implausibility of such an act, especially considering the intricacies involved.
 
Brueski mentioned the defense's insinuations that the DNA evidence might have been manipulated to implicate Kohberger. To this, Coffindaffer retorted, "Who was it gonna be planted by? It was partially under Maddie Mo's body. How did, who got in there and magically put that and who scraped his DNA off or transferred the DNA off without getting their DNA?"
 
Moreover, the discussion ventured into the legal territory when Brueski inquired about the defense's request to delay court proceedings to allow for a deeper probe into potential procedural issues with the grand jury. Coffindaffer was firm in her stance against such a stay, emphasizing that they already had one, granted specifically to transcribe and transfer all information from the grand jury to the defense. She argued that the defense, at this point, should instead ask for a "continuance" to justify their need for more time, saying, "They need a continuance. It's time to move forward."
 
With the trial date for Kohberger set for October 2nd, Brueski and Coffindaffer touched on the looming trial timeline. When asked about the feasibility of the trial commencing as scheduled, Coffindaffer expressed skepticism. "We are talking as of right now, about a month and a half or less until the expected trial date... You have said this is not going to take place in October of 2023. Do you still believe that? Yes."
 
The dialogue between Brueski and Coffindaffer highlighted the intricacies of the justice system, the significance of DNA evidence, and the overarching quest for the truth in legal battles. As the trial date nears, all eyes will be on the Brian Kohberger case, hoping that, as Brueski and Coffindaffer have both emphasized, the facts will indeed prevail.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," hosted by Tony Brueski, a spotlight was shone on the intricate details surrounding the Bryan Kohberger case. Bob Motta, a seasoned defense attorney and host of the podcast "Defense Diaries," joined Brueski to discuss the evolving evidence and strategic legal decisions in this high-profile case.
 
For those unfamiliar, the case of Bryan Kohberger has been marked by a stream of motions and a whirlpool of evidence - some in the public domain and some undisclosed. "There's very likely a ton of things that we do not know... it may be super damning, maybe very exonerating," said Brueski, emphasizing the challenges of drawing conclusions based on limited available information.
 
Central to the discussion was the significance of digital evidence. In an era where cell phones play an integral role in everyday life, the data stored within can be crucial in criminal investigations. Motta highlighted that even if one believes they've deleted something, law enforcement has tools that can recover "over 90% of what it recovers of what people think that they've deleted from their phone."
 
Such details can turn the tide in a case. For instance, if evidence emerges that Kohberger had information related to the victims on his phone, it could be detrimental to his defense. On the flip side, if his device is devoid of any related data, it might indicate the absence of premeditation.
 
However, Motta emphasized that public opinion should tread carefully given the vast amount of investigation that typically follows an arrest. Contrary to popular belief, "the misnomer that investigations stop upon arrest is completely incorrect," he said. Instead, that's when the deep dives into a defendant's life, acquaintances, and personal belongings truly commence.
 
The discussion then shifted to the strategic motions being made in the courtroom. Kohberger's defense attorney, Ann Taylor, has made two requests to stay court proceedings. The objective? Investigate potential procedural issues with the grand jury. For those less versed in legal parlance, such a request seeks to halt proceedings temporarily.
 
Brueski questioned the importance of this second motion. To this, Motta, while affirming his defense background, explained the delicate balance of considerations. The state's argument is that Taylor's repeated motions might be an attempt to buy more time for defense preparations. Conversely, Taylor has accused the state of blindsiding her with decisions, like opting for a grand jury, which, while uncommon in Idaho, can keep proceedings more secretive than a preliminary hearing.
 
Delays, however, have their consequences. The impending October trial date might seem distant for casual observers, but for legal professionals, it's "the blink of an eye," remarked Motta. A case of this magnitude demands extensive preparation, from crafting examinations to conducting witness interviews. It's not a matter of lawyers "winging it" but a meticulous process that demands time and precision.
 
Yet, the overarching tension between the defense and the state isn't new. "There's always arguments between the state and us in terms of getting stuff turned over," Motta stated. It's a game of strategic moves, much like a chess match, where each side aims to position themselves advantageously.
 
In concluding the discussion, Motta emphasized the risks and rewards of rushing to trial. While it may appear as pushing for swift justice, a hurried trial could compromise the thoroughness of the case. It's a complex dance of rights, evidence, and strategies.
 
As the legal world and public await further developments in the Bryan Kohberger case, one thing is certain: every move, evidence piece, and the decision will be under the microscope, making it one of the most closely watched trials of recent times.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the dimly lit courtroom on Friday, the atmosphere was palpable as Bryan Kohberger's defense introduced an unexpected expert witness - a genealogist. This wasn't just any genealogist, but someone with a mission to demystify the intricate dance of DNA sequences in the realm of genetic genealogy.
 
 Dr. Leah Larkin, with eyes that spoke of countless hours studying the stories our genes tell, took the stand. With a voice steady yet filled with a passion for her field, she began weaving a tale of how DNA threads through generations, constructing intricate family trees. Yet, as she delved deeper, a poignant truth emerged. The DNA strands, as resolute as they might seem, do not always paint a clear picture of how one soul connects to another.
 
 Kohberger's defense, desperate to shed light on the shadows surrounding the case, hangs on this crucial point. They are clamoring for more evidence, specifically pertaining to genetic genealogy. They seek to understand how, in this vast tapestry of genetic information, their client became entwined with the haunting case of the Idaho student murders. With every passing moment, the weight of uncertainty grows, and the quest for truth becomes even more desperate.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the podcast's latest episode, we spotlight Bryan Kohberger, revealing a troubled history that could offer insights into his recent alleged crimes. Kohberger, now 28, who faces charges of murdering four University of Idaho students, had previously been expelled from a high school law enforcement program. The reason? Multiple complaints about his behavior, primarily from female students.
 
 From Dreams of Law Enforcement to Expulsion
 
 Bryan Kohberger's aspiration to join the ranks of law enforcement was no secret. As a high school student at Monroe Career and Technical Institute, he was a part of their law enforcement program. However, as Tanya Carmella-Beers, a former administrator of the institute, revealed on the podcast, his behavior led to his eventual removal from the program.
 
 Carmella-Beers was quoted, stating, "[Kohberger] wasn't gonna end up in the police academy." She further explained that he had taken the program "extremely seriously," but his path took a turn after a group of female students lodged a complaint against him. While she refrained from going into specific details due to student privacy laws, she noted that the circumstances leading to his exit "now, makes sense."
 
 From Law Enforcement Dreams to Gruesome Crimes
 
 On November 13th, tragedy struck near the University of Idaho when four students, Goncalves, 21, Madison Mogen, 21, Xana Kernodle, 20, and Ethan Chapin, 20, were found dead in their off-campus residence. Kohberger, with his once cherished dreams of law enforcement, now stands as the primary suspect for these heinous crimes.
 
 Kohberger's subsequent activities after being dismissed from the law enforcement program also raise eyebrows. He transferred to a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning course but dropped out a year later. Interestingly, he used his brief stint in the law enforcement program to secure a part-time security guard position at Mount Pleasant High School. His tenure there was short-lived, ending with a forced resignation under mysterious circumstances.
 
 The Evolution of a Suspect
 
 Kohberger's high school years were marked by personal transformations. According to close friends Casey Arntz and Bree, he faced weight-related bullying, leading him to lose nearly 100 pounds during his senior year. However, this physical transformation was accompanied by a behavioral shift. Kohberger started exhibiting bullying behavior himself, targeting Arntz's brother with physical aggression.
 
 Bree also highlighted another disturbing development: Kohberger's descent into drug use, notably heroin.
 
 A report from DailyMail.com further paints a picture of a man who consistently made others, especially women, uncomfortable. This behavior extended into his adult life. Jordan Serulneck, owner of a Pennsylvania bar, described Kohberger as someone who made "creepy comments" and was aggressive towards female staff. Additionally, during his tenure as a teaching assistant at Washington State University, Kohberger faced accusations of sexism.
 
 The Legal Battle Ahead
 
 Kohberger, who has plead not guilty, is set to face trial on October 2. The pre-trial hearings have been contentious. The defense demands more time to address potential procedural issues with the grand jury indictment from May, and they're also pushing for further disclosure on the DNA profiles prosecutors plan to use.
 
 In contrast, prosecutors urge Kohberger to provide evidence of his alibi for the night of the murders. They've countered the defense's requests with their own, ensuring that DNA profiles remain protected and addressing other timeline concerns in Kohberger's upcoming trial.
 
 Key evidence against Kohberger includes his DNA found on a knife sheath at the crime scene and CCTV footage of his white Hyundai Elantra car near the scene. Another potential blow to his defense is a witness statement from a surviving roommate, who claims the killer had "bushy eyebrows," matching Kohberger's appearance.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski engaged in an enlightening discussion with Detective Jason Howe about a new term that has been thrown into the world of DNA matching: "Phantom matches." This term has been introduced by the Bryan Kohberger Defense Team and has stirred controversy in the legal world.
 
 Leah Larkin, a DNA expert and a witness hired by the defense, introduced the term "phantom matches" in an attempt to sow doubt in the legitimacy of DNA testing associated with the Kohberger case. The fundamental question being raised is: could there be something within the DNA testing process that falsely connected Kohberger to the crimes in question?
 
 Detective Howe was quick to address the term, with Brueski describing it as "a fancy word" that might confuse those not well-versed in DNA science. Brueski highlighted that the STR profile in question is "at least 5.7 octillion times more likely to be Kohberger than an individual randomly selected from the general population." He expressed skepticism about the term's introduction, asking, "What are they talking about? Where do you get this expert that's just coming up with these sort of things?"
 
 Interestingly, Detective Howe proposed that the defense might have a better chance arguing administrative errors rather than introducing unproven concepts. Drawing a parallel from his expertise in latent fingerprints, Howe noted that while errors in fingerprint identification do happen, their occurrence is extremely rare. In fact, he believes the odds of such a DNA error are even lower. "You continue to do additional tests; it's going to be the same result. It looks like it's his DNA, and I truly believe that it is," said Howe.
 
 To illustrate the point further, both Howe and Brueski utilized the analogy of a key. Brueski posited that even if a key (representing the DNA) drops in a bucket of mud and is cleaned up, it would still open the door. The ridges on the key (like the DNA pattern) remain unchanged. The focus, Brueski emphasized, should be on the result of a DNA match being just that, irrespective of handling procedures.
 
 Detective Howe agreed, mentioning the "confrontation clause" of the Constitution. He emphasized that while one could argue about policy adherence or potential improvements in handling processes, if one were to entertain the notion of "phantom matches," they could easily conduct another test. If the results remained consistent, what would the defense's argument be then? Would they suggest the possibility of two phantom matches? Howe stated, "I just think it's a method to create doubt."
 
 The introduction of "phantom matches" by the Kohberger Defense Team adds a new layer of complexity to DNA evidence discussions in legal settings. As the case progresses, it will be intriguing to see how the courts and juries respond to this term and the doubts it's intended to cast. One thing remains clear from the podcast discussion: While new terminology might introduce uncertainty, the fundamental science behind DNA matching remains robust and widely accepted within the forensic community.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent development concerning the University of Idaho student homicides, Bryan Kohberger's capital murder trial has been indefinitely postponed. This decision comes as a result of Kohberger waiving his right to a speedy trial. The trial was previously set to commence on Oct. 2.

Anne Taylor, the lead public defender representing Kohberger, cited inadequate time for appropriate legal counsel as the primary reason for the postponement. Addressing the court, Taylor mentioned, “The defense intends to reset the trial date only once, with no subsequent changes."

Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson labeled this decision as a “smart move,” acknowledging the strategic and logistical implications of the trial's delay. Moreover, the presiding Judge John Judge of Idaho’s 2nd Judicial District repeatedly sought confirmation from Kohberger to ensure he was fully aware of the right he was waiving. "Absolutely," was Kohberger's decisive response.

The crimes that Kohberger, 28, stands accused of are heinous. He allegedly murdered four University of Idaho students in an off-campus residence last November. The victims were seniors Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves, both aged 21, and junior Xana Kernodle and freshman Ethan Chapin, both 20 years old. Following the indictment of Kohberger on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of felony burglary in mid-May, a scheduled preliminary hearing was canceled. Subsequent to his arraignment a week later, Kohberger did not offer a plea when questioned, prompting Judge to enter a plea of "not guilty" on his behalf.

The Goncalves family, still mourning the tragic loss, shared their concerns with the Idaho Statesman. In their statement, they expressed, “This case carries tremendous implications for the families and the community. We are hopeful that this added time will enable both sides to be comprehensively prepared for the upcoming trial date.”

Earlier, the family had shared their fears on their Facebook page regarding Kohberger possibly waiving his right to a speedy trial. Their post read, "If he does, trial will not be starting on Oct. 2, and it might be years before it begins. This prolonged wait is agonizing for us."

Experts in the field also weighed in on this decision. Edwina Elcox, a Boise-based criminal defense attorney, underscored the complexity and magnitude of evidence in the Kohberger case. She stated, “It was absolutely the right move in a case like this.” Elcox anticipates the trial might commence as early as next spring.

Additionally, the defense team has imminent plans to file motions to exclude the death penalty as a potential punishment if Kohberger is found guilty and to address the issue of cameras in the courtroom. Kohberger's potential death penalty had been announced by the prosecutors in June.

Kohberger's arrest took place in eastern Pennsylvania last December during a school break, culminating a nearly eight-week-long manhunt. By Jan. 4, he was back in Idaho and made his initial court appearance in the state the following day. Since then, he has been held in the Latah County Jail.

Despite the trial's postponement, the next court appearance for Kohberger is still slated for Sept. 1. This hearing will address the defense's plea to dismiss the grand jury indictment, asserting that jurors were inadequately instructed and that the indictment doesn't meet essential legal criteria.

Given that grand juries operate in confidentiality, neither defendants nor their defense, nor the public, are allowed to participate. The prosecution presented its objection to the defense's plea for dismissal last week. Adjustments to the pretrial schedule may arise due to Kohberger's decision to waive his right to a swift trial.

Anne Taylor stressed that the ruling on the plea to dismiss the grand jury indictment would be a significant determinant in the trial's scheduling. Both Judge and Thompson concurred with this assessment.

This case, given its gravity and public interest, will continue to be monitored closely by citizens and legal experts alike.


Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

On Wednesday, Bryan Kohberger stood before the court for a status hearing, choosing to forgo his right to a speedy trial. This strategic move by the alleged murderer has postponed his trial, previously slated for October 2. Anne Taylor, Kohberger's legal representative, asserted that the defense requires additional time to adeptly present their case. The court has yet to determine a revised trial date.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Recent episodes of the riveting podcast "Hidden Killers" delved deep into the mysterious case of Brian Kohberger. Host Tony Brueski, in an engaging conversation with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, shared intriguing insights into Kohberger’s psyche and the broader implications for society's approach to mental health.
 
 The former FBI specialist began by highlighting the profound influence of one's upbringing on shaping their life trajectory. He stated, "Our genetics and biology give us what we're born with and then our upbringing, our nurture part takes over." Dreeke recalled writings from Kohberger’s teenage years which vividly portrayed his emotional turmoil. "You could hear the pain in his voice," Dreeke observed. The former agent continued, “You could hear how disjointed he was. And you could hear that this is the making of someone that if he doesn't get immediate help, he is going down the path of severe psychopathy, most likely."
 
 Brueski delved deeper into Kohberger’s background, revealing how he was expelled from high school following complaints from female students. Such information fits seamlessly with the behavior pattern constructed from Kohberger’s youth, further emphasizing the necessity of addressing signs of severe psychopathy early.
 
 The discussion took a broader turn when Brueski questioned the challenges parents face in the United States, particularly when they suspect their child might suffer from an innate mental condition. The reluctance of many to confront this reality can, according to Brueski, lead to cases where children are shuffled between classes without truly addressing the root problem.
 
 Dreeke expressed profound empathy for parents grappling with such challenges. Discussing Kohberger’s family, he said, "From the optic that we've seen, when you do the thought experiment and you look at a troubled teen that appears, you know, the parents were involved in trying to do things." Drawing attention to Kohberger’s father’s attempt to help him socialize by asking neighbors to engage with his son, Brueski highlighted the parents’ awareness of their son's struggles. However, he also raised concerns about the limited resources and guidance available to parents in such situations.
 
 Furthermore, the conversation touched upon the broader issue of mental health in the country. "Mental health still remains the problem," remarked Brueski, who noted the challenges of both recognizing potential mental health issues and effectively preventing them.
 
 Brueski referenced a thought-provoking book, "Homo Deus," which delves into the future evolution of our species, particularly the quest to conquer death and discover happiness. He stated, "And part of that is going to have to overcome these mental health challenges. We're gonna have to really focus hard on our brain and how to make it healthy for everyone."
 
 However, with the proliferation of true crime stories and discussions across media, the duo also questioned the potential ramifications for the justice system. Can the inundation of such content taint a jury pool or interfere with a fair trial? Dreeke believes it’s a double-edged sword, acknowledging that while early portrayals in series like CSI may have skewed public perceptions, unscripted discussions in shows like "Hidden Killers" might restore balance.
 
 This episode of "Hidden Killers" masterfully interweaves the individual case of Brian Kohberger with the broader societal challenges tied to mental health, parenting, and media's influence, providing listeners with both gripping details and thought-provoking insights.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the widely acclaimed podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski delved into the controversial topic of genetic genealogy and its role in criminal cases. Joining him was psychotherapist and author, Shavaun Scott, shedding light on how defense teams increasingly target DNA evidence methodologies to advocate for their clients.
 
 "As expected," began Brueski, "defense teams are leaving no stone unturned, especially when it comes to the genetic genealogy process." He noted that while there may not seem to be many avenues for the defense to pursue, it appears that challenging the DNA evidence is becoming a prime focus. "The science is pretty solid on this," Brueski pointed out, "but I'm curious if there's a chance they can find legitimate traction here."
 
 Scott echoed Brueski's sentiments, explaining that while the defense is fervently looking for technicalities, she remains unconvinced about the actual impact these technicalities might have on the evidence itself. "There's concern about whether individuals whose genetic material was in the database had given consent for sharing their information with law enforcement," she said. Such details have the potential to cloud the evidentiary process, but the question remains: Can they negate the outcome?
 
 An intriguing point raised was regarding the administrative processes and potential errors that might have occurred, like unchecked boxes by grand jury members. Scott opined, "It feels like a desperate attempt, but their aim is to identify anything they can to challenge the validity of the evidence."
 
 The broader issue brought to the forefront was the intersection of the pursuit of justice and legal technicalities. "It's frustrating," Brueski remarked, "Especially when justice for the victims seems overshadowed by these technicalities. The main question is whether these so-called errors actually impact the results of any tests or evidence."
 
 The duo reflected upon how, in high-stakes cases, particularly those involving the death penalty, defense teams might be driven to employ every possible strategy in hopes of getting pieces of evidence dismissed. Brueski lamented the possibility of the truth getting overshadowed by minor procedural glitches. "It feels at times like the truth doesn't matter, especially when technicalities can change outcomes."
 
 However, Scott added balance to the discourse by highlighting that such a combative approach is not limited to defense teams. Prosecutors, in some instances, have been known to employ tactics that could potentially obscure the truth. "Our legal system is undeniably adversarial," Scott explained, "and sometimes, both sides are so committed to winning that the primary objective of uncovering the truth takes a backseat."
 
 In a system that often seems polarized, the sentiments expressed by Scott underscore the importance of both parties playing fair. "What we genuinely want," Scott concluded, "is both sides to be transparent and sincere in their pursuit. After all, justice should be about the truth, first and foremost."
 
 The episode serves as a timely reminder of the intricate balance between legal processes, technological advancements in forensics, and the undying quest for justice. As genetic genealogy continues to be an instrumental tool in solving cases, the legal challenges it faces will shape its future use in courtrooms across the country.
 
 With these expert insights, the episode undoubtedly adds a new layer to the ongoing discourse about the ethics, reliability, and implications of genetic genealogy in the legal realm. Those keen on keeping a pulse on these developments will undoubtedly be waiting for the next enlightening episode from "Hidden Killers".

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The upcoming case against Bryan Kohberger, the legal stage is set for some intricate courtroom maneuvers. According to a recent discussion on the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, Defense Attorney and host of "Defense Diaries," Bob Motta, addressed the pending motion to dismiss the charges against Kohberger. The motion, raised by defense attorney Ann Taylor, is scheduled for the end of this week.
 
 While the speedy trial has already been waived, removing the October 2nd trial date from the table, Taylor is reportedly still going to argue for a dismissal. Motta, elaborating on the intricacies of this maneuver, stated, “I think that Ann Taylor has been...waiting for an indictment by grand jury because they're very unusual in Idaho. They typically go by preliminary hearing.” It’s important to note that while grand juries are standard practice in many states, Idaho often relies on preliminary hearings to decide whether to charge a defendant.
 
 To the surprise of many, including Motta, who predicted this change in course earlier this year, the state opted for a grand jury in the Kohberger case. He hypothesized that this move might have been driven by a desire to mitigate potential media interference, saying, "As much as some people don't want to acknowledge the fact that a jury pool can be tainted by constant negative press about a defendant, the fact of the matter is that it can."
 
 Central to Taylor's argument for dismissal is a challenge to the constitutionality of Idaho's grand jury indictments. Motta explained, “She's basically saying that the Idaho constitution... has set the standard for a grand jury indictment that it essentially has to be beyond a reasonable doubt.” The crux of the issue is a potential discrepancy between the Idaho constitution and the Idaho Criminal Rules (ICR). While the ICR states that a grand jury only needs probable cause to indict, Taylor argues that the Idaho constitution requires a higher standard—namely, the same "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard used in trials.
 
 Motta found this legal contention particularly fascinating, pointing out that if Taylor's interpretation is correct, the grand jury was misinformed of the burden they had to meet. He elaborated, “You have these two competing things and they're very different burdens. She's basically arguing, look, they went in and they went to the grand jury and they gave them the wrong burden.”
 
 The implications of Taylor's argument are far-reaching. If she prevails, it doesn't mean that Kohberger will be freed, but rather that the legal process might have to start over. When Brueski pressed Motta on this, asking about the path forward should Taylor succeed, Motta clarified, “If she did succeed and he dismissed that grand jury indictment, that doesn't mean that Kohlberg's walking. That means, yeah, they'd have to do the process all over again.”
 
 While Motta expressed skepticism about the likelihood of Taylor's motion succeeding, he admitted, “For legal nerds, it's going to be a very interesting conversation and argument. I am chomping at the bit to hear it.”
 
 The Kohberger case thus presents not just the story of the crime itself but also a deep dive into the nuances and intricacies of the legal system. As defense attorneys, prosecutors, and legal enthusiasts alike await the courtroom debate, many are eager to see how these arguments play out in shaping the course of Idaho's criminal justice process.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the unfolding case of Brian Kohberger, the limelight isn't solely on the defendant but equally on the strategy his defense attorneys are choosing to employ. The recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast featured an insightful discussion between host Tony Brueski and guest Shavaun Scott, a noted psychotherapist and author, about the nuances of Kohberger's defense and the court's reaction to it.
 
A significant development, Brueski notes, is the judge's decision to grant Kohberger's attorneys an additional three weeks to furnish evidence supporting Kohberger's alibi. "The alibi, as it stands, is peculiarly vague," Brueski pointed out. "The defense maintains he has a penchant for nighttime drives. But without corroborative details, such as specific locations or potential witnesses, it raises more questions than it answers."
 
Scott echoed these sentiments, questioning the viability of the alibi itself. "If they had concrete proof, such as a footage of his car far from the crime scene, that would be another matter," she remarked. However, she also speculated about a potential pitfall: "What if the 'nighttime drive' is merely an explanation for why his car was seen near the residence in Moscow?"
 
For Brueski, this 'nighttime drive' defense appeared weak from the outset. "Claiming a penchant for nighttime drives without substantial proof or specificity seems more incriminating than exculpatory. It's now imperative for the defense to determine if relevant footage even exists, given that most surveillance systems have short data retention policies."
 
As the discussion veered toward the courtroom dynamics, Scott and Brueski both showed appreciation for the judge's approach. Brueski remarked, "It almost feels as if the judge is piercing through apparent stall tactics. There seems to be a low tolerance for repetitious arguments that don't bring any substantial value to Kohberger's defense."
 
Scott added her perspective, observing that while some judges can appear indecisive, often influenced by aggressive legal maneuvers, this particular judge seems both clear and fair in his decisions. "There's a sense of clarity and an unmistakable intent to ensure justice without unnecessary delays," she stated.
 
 However, the accelerated pace of the proceedings did raise some concerns. Brueski reflected, "It's commendable how swiftly this case is moving, especially considering the trial is set to commence less than a year after the alleged crimes. Yet, such speed could potentially open doors to appellate issues later on."
 
 In the intricate dance of legal proceedings, the Kohberger case serves as a testament to the challenges of building a defense, especially when it hinges on a seemingly flimsy alibi. With a deadline looming, the next few weeks will be crucial for Kohberger's attorneys to either solidify their stance or reconsider their strategy.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the popular podcast "Hidden Killers," former FBI Special Agent and daily contributor Jennifer Coffindaffer spoke with host Tony Brueski about the ongoing legal case of Brian Kohberger. The discussion revealed intriguing insights into the defense's approach and raised pertinent questions about the forthcoming trial proceedings.
 
 "Obviously Speedy Trial is now gone, and there's not gonna be an October second trial date," started Brueski, setting the tone for the discussion. Coffindaffer predicted the developments from the outset. "Where we go from here is going to be a deluge of defense motions," she stated. And indeed, the recent motion aims to overturn the grand jury indictment, based on four principal aspects.
 
 Coffindaffer elaborated, "First, the defense is arguing biased grand jurors. Second, the claim that inadmissible evidence was presented. Third, a perceived lack of evidence. And fourth, they allege prosecutorial misconduct, particularly the withholding of exculpatory evidence." The gravity of these claims is clear; they strike at the very heart of the justice system, challenging the fairness and validity of the process.
 
 "Did they hold any ground with any of these claims?" Brueski asked, seeking clarity on the defense's position. However, Coffindaffer highlighted a challenge: the documentation and evidence are sealed, making it tough to scrutinize the specifics of the allegations. "We can't even examine it," she noted, emphasizing the difficulty in determining the basis of the defense's claims.
 
 The issue of "prosecutorial misconduct" was especially intriguing, given its recurrence throughout the pre-trial phases. Coffindaffer shed light on its significance: "Exculpatory really just means not inculpatory. Sometimes that can be just by omission." She touched upon particular concerns related to Bethany Funk and suggested that the defense's pursuit of these matters aligns with Defense Attorney Ann Taylor's known aggressive style.
 
 Drawing from her experience, Coffindaffer observed that Taylor's approach is to "really go to the throat of the prosecution." She recollected a recent courtroom episode, stating, "She was admonished actually in the last hearing... The judge said, at some point you gotta believe the prosecution when he says they don't have anything."
 
 Brueski further delved into Taylor's strategy, posing whether her relentless pursuit for more evidence, even after the prosecution's insistence that everything was handed over, is indicative of a deeper knowledge or merely a rigorous defense approach. Coffindaffer opined, "She's banging pinatas right now," suggesting that Taylor is determined to explore every avenue, whether fruitful or not.
 
 Drawing parallels from her time with the FBI, Coffindaffer expressed familiarity with such defense tactics. "I've seen this before where they just keep coming and saying something's there," she noted. Emphasizing the full transparency of certain processes, she added, "We call it open discovery."
 
 In conclusion, the "Hidden Killers" podcast episode painted a vivid picture of the unfolding legal drama surrounding Brian Kohberger's case. As Coffindaffer aptly described it, the situation is akin to "banging pinatas," with the defense vigorously shaking every tree, hoping for a potential breakthrough. As the case progresses, listeners and legal enthusiasts will keenly await every twist and turn, looking for signs of where the pinata's candy might fall next.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of the acclaimed podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski sat down with former FBI Special Agent and contributor Jennifer Coffindaffer to unpack the latest developments surrounding the contentious Brian Kohberger trial.
 
 Brian Kohberger, the subject of much media scrutiny, has been facing a series of defense motions, one of which seeks to overturn the grand jury indictment on four significant claims. These range from allegations of biased grand jurors to prosecutorial misconduct. While the public awaits conclusive decisions on these motions, Coffindaffer shared insight into the trajectory of the trial and potential future outcomes.
 
 If the judge does find grounds to dismiss the case based on the defense’s claims, Coffindaffer clarified a common misconception. "Suddenly Kohberger walks," she stated, "is not the case. He still sits in jail based on the probable cause decided upon by the judge pursuant to the initial criminal complaint." This would then lead to the convening of a new grand jury to correct any prior oversights.
 
 In one of the more intriguing turns in the trial, Kohberger's defense is expected to provide evidence regarding an alibi. However, Coffindaffer expressed skepticism about the defense's ability to offer any substantive evidence. "Based on the fact, I don't think they have anything," she remarked. "If they did have something, they would've already presented it."
 
 The trial also witnessed an unusual situation involving the defense's expert witnesses. During one of the hearings, a total of four expert witnesses were brought forward, a tactic that raised eyebrows. The defense's late introduction of these witnesses and their failure to provide comprehensive Curriculum Vitaes in a timely manner was met with apprehension. Coffindaffer noted the judge's leniency, "In the abundance of caution, this judge is going to allow a lot of leeway," suggesting that the judge’s primary concern is to prevent any cause for appeals.
 
 The most significant revelation from the hearing was expert witness Ms. Vargas' subsequent retraction of parts of her testimony. Vargas also allegedly admitted to not reading the entirety of a declaration she signed. Brueski highlighted the unusual nature of such a development, saying, "It just seems very bizarre."
 
 Coffindaffer concurred, emphasizing that such a move is essentially career-ending for an expert witness. She pointed out, "I can't imagine any excuse for either saying something on the stand that you now renounce or if you signed something that you didn't read that didn't contain your expert opinions."
 
 There was also an undertone of sarcasm when discussing the quality and relevancy of some of the defense's chosen experts. "They called an attorney who just has experience litigating cases involving DNA," Coffindaffer said, emphasizing that the defense team already had such expertise in-house. The inclusion of a botanist-turned-self-taught-DNA-expert and the reliance on Vargas, who later recanted her statement, painted a picture of a defense team struggling to find credible experts willing to take their position.
 
 Brueski humorously alluded to the situation by joking, "We have Samantha2468 from TikTok. She's coming on here. She's been following this from the beginning, and she thinks you are innocent."
 
 The episode offered a detailed look into the unfolding legal drama surrounding Brian Kohberger. With the next phase of the trial set for September 8th, all eyes are on the defense's next move and the court's decisions. Whether the defense's tactics are strategic or signs of desperation remains to be seen.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Defense Attorney Bob Motta Breaks Down DNA Arguments in Kohberger Case
 In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Tony Brueski delved deep into the ongoing case of Brian Kohberger. The discussion, featuring Defense Attorney Bob Motta of "Defense Diaries," shed light on the complexities surrounding the use of new DNA evidence techniques in court.
 
 At the heart of the matter lies the speedy trial wave, which seems to have been used by Anne Taylor, defense attorney for Kohberger, to buy more time for a closer examination of evidence. One point of contention is the availability of certain evidence, particularly data and research related to IgG, which the state argues is not subject to Rule 17 and is therefore non-discoverable. "Everything that we've been hearing about with the IgG and all that data and the research that she wants, and the state is, you know, claiming, look, it doesn't fall under Rule 17 and we don't have to give it to you," Brueski mentioned.
 
 According to Motta, if Taylor files a motion to suppress based on the IgG information, it is likely to be denied due to the third-party nature of the information source. He explains that traditionally, DNA profiles submitted either to public databases or private ones, such as Ancestry or 23andMe, have required a legal warrant for law enforcement access. However, some people opt to upload their profiles to databases like GEDMatch, which law enforcement can access without a warrant.
 
 Motta points out that this new realm of forensic science presents a unique challenge as the courts grapple with its implications. He said, "This is so brand new that it hasn't been vetted yet."
 
 The issue is rooted in the sharing of the Y STR DNA strand, which can be common to every male in a family lineage. Motta elaborated, "Because of the fact that you share that same Y STR DNA strand with everybody in your familial line, all the way to males in your family line to your great-great-great grandfather... the argument is, do does a defendant who they're not searching him... have standing to say, okay, you needed a warrant to get into that database, searching for essentially my DNA."
 
 He emphasizes the unparalleled nature of this technology, drawing a distinction between voluntarily shared data, such as text messages, and the involuntarily shared genetic markers of distant relatives. "There is nothing voluntary about your distant relatives sharing your DNA. That's just a fact," he affirmed.
 
 There's no doubt that this DNA technology presents law enforcement with a potent tool. But as Motta highlights, while there's immense potential for good, there are also questions about civil rights and liberties. The crux of the matter is the need for a warrant to access such data. This is not about discontinuing its use, but ensuring that it's accessed lawfully.
 
 "Use it, but you have to get a warrant just like you do for anything else," he noted.
 
 As the debate continues, Motta doesn't seem optimistic about Taylor's chances with her motion to suppress based on current legal interpretations. "He'll lose it. But that's how you get to the appellate court," he stated.
 
 Already, states like Maryland have legislated on this issue, but any law is open to interpretation and litigation. As Motta poignantly summed it up, "The whole thing is about interpretation. You have the state interpreting it one way and you have the defense interpreting another way. And then you leave it to a judge to decide."
 
 It remains to be seen how the courts will navigate this new terrain, but one thing is clear: the landscape of forensic science and the law is undergoing a transformation, one case at a time.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The case against Brian Kohberger is steadily becoming more complicated with each passing day as it becomes evident that a speedy trial is no longer a possibility. Neama Rahmani, an attorney and former federal prosecutor, joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to discuss the intricacies of the case and the strategies employed by the defense.
 
 Despite the defense waiving their right to a speedy trial from the very beginning, Rahmani indicated that the appellate lawyers and law and motion folks are already actively involved in the case, with various motions being filed to dismiss the indictment. Though he hasn't seen the memorandum in support of the motion, as it was filed under seal, Rahmani expressed doubt that the motion would succeed. Nevertheless, he emphasized that it represents an additional appellate issue that the state and federal appellate judges will need to examine.
 
 Rahmani pointed out that while the speedy trial is the defendant's right, the fact that Kohberger is in custody means that the judge is more likely to grant the defense the extra time they request for preparation. The defense has indicated that they will be raising 24 issues during an upcoming hearing with the judge, including biased grand jurors, inadmissible evidence, lack of evidence, and prosecutorial misconduct. Rahmani considers it highly unlikely that the indictment will be dismissed based on these arguments, but acknowledges that the defense is employing a "kitchen sink approach," throwing everything out there in the hopes that something will stick.
 
 One particularly notable motion expected to be raised soon is an attempt by Kohberger's lawyer, Anne Taylor, to take the death penalty off the table. Rahmani indicated that while it would usually be too early to argue this point, a similar motion was successful in the Lori Vallow case, leading him to believe that it's not entirely out of the question. He explained that in a capital case like this one, securing a life sentence instead of the death penalty would be considered a win by the defense.
 
 As for the timeline of the trial, Rahmani predicts that it will likely take place sometime in 2024, though nothing is certain. The defense will need ample time to prepare, especially considering the amount of scientific evidence involved, including DNA, cell site data, and video surveillance. Experts will need to be lined up for both the guilt phase and the potential penalty phase of the trial, and the defense will need to present mitigating factors that might spare Kohberger's life.
 
Ultimately, Rahmani emphasizes that these cases are incredibly difficult to defend, especially when there is a lot of publicity surrounding them. The judge is expected to give the defense a lot of leeway in their preparations, but only time will tell how the case will unfold.
 
In conclusion, the case against Brian Kohberger continues to develop, with the defense employing a variety of strategies in an attempt to secure the best possible outcome for their client. While it remains uncertain how successful these strategies will be, it is clear that the defense is leaving no stone unturned in their efforts to defend Kohberger. With the trial expected to occur in 2024, there is still a long road ahead for all parties involved.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski sat down with Trial Consultant and Body Language Expert, Susan Constantine, to unpack the courtroom behavior of Brian Kohberger. Last week, the court witnessed Kohberger waiving his right to a speedy trial, sparking a myriad of questions about his overall strategy and intentions.
 
During the interview, Constantine remarked on Kohberger's demeanor when answering the judge's questions. "When I'm watching his behavior, he was very convincing," she observed. "He answered the questions, he listened, his voice tone was confident." Kohberger’s assertive responses and the manner he communicated seemed strategic, prompting Constantine to wonder about his overarching legal game plan, especially given the decision to extend the trial.
 
Constantine further discussed the courtroom dynamics, particularly the vigilant role of Kohberger's attorney, who was described as indefatigable in her efforts. "You see his attorney constantly standing up over and over again...she is a real bulldog. For a defendant, you definitely would want to have her as your attorney," commented Constantine. Brueski agreed, noting, "She certainly is spacing this out and making the arguments on his behalf fairly well."
 
However, it’s not just Kohberger’s behavior that’s drawing attention. The defense's strategy seems to be throwing a wide net, planning to bring forth a motion to dismiss based on various reasons, from biased grand juror accusations and alleged inadmissible evidence to claims of prosecutorial misconduct. When asked about this approach, Constantine was straightforward: "I think they're grasping at straws and slinging mud every which way they can."
 
Kohberger’s defense, notably his claimed penchant for nighttime driving, was highlighted as being particularly weak. "That seems to be quite his norm, but that is a horrible defense," Constantine asserted. Given this, the defense's varied tactics could be seen as an attempt to defend their client vigorously, even if their foundations appear shaky.
 
While it might appear that the defense is trying everything to get the trial dismissed, it’s worth noting that even a dismissal based on one of the reasons doesn’t necessarily mean Kohberger would walk free. Brueski explained, "Essentially, if they have an issue with the grand jurors, they would just essentially reconvene another grand jury." This would in effect reset the trial clock.
 
A central point of discussion was the defense’s approach to time. Earlier, there was a sense that the defense attorney, Ann Taylor, was trying to move things along swiftly. Now, there appears to be a strategic slowing down. Constantine believes this might be a tactic to buy time, suggesting, "Buying time to restrategize. That's what she's doing."
 
The conversation rounded out with a focus on the upcoming motion to dismiss and whether Kohberger's alibi would remain central to the defense. Constantine expressed that the judge might be providing Kohberger every possible chance, ensuring all bases are covered. "I think that the judge is giving a lot of leeway in Kohberger's case," she concluded.
 
Kohberger's trial continues to be a riveting spectacle. As it unfolds, many will watch closely, parsing every move, every gesture, and every strategy for a deeper understanding of the case's direction.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The National Offender database, which contains the DNA profiles of offenders, has more than 13 million profiles, almost double since 2009. However, there is growing concern about the accuracy of DNA matches and the potential for human error in the system. Forensic scientist and professor Dan Krane revealed alarming error rates in DNA test results on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski.
 
 Krane, who has extensive experience working with DNA databases, expressed his excitement about the potential to identify error rates or determine errors in DNA test results. He cited his involvement in an investigation for the state of Victoria in Australia, where he had access to about 15,000 DNA profiles. "When you did all possible pairwise comparisons of those 15,000 people, what you found is that there were a fair number that matched perfectly at 14 out of 18," Krane explained. "There were fewer that matched at 15 out of 18, but still some, fewer that matched at 16 out of 18, but still some, and then a whole bunch that matched at 17 out of 18, more than matched at 14 out of 18, and then a whole bunch that matched at 18 out of 18."
 
 Krane explained that the only explanation for the ones that matched at 18 out of 18 was that these were people who were entered into the system twice, possibly under an alias. However, the ones that matched at 17 out of 18 indicated that there was a mistake in one of the two times their DNA got entered into the system. This translated into an error rate of one in 300. "And when you're talking about chances of a coincidental match in the quintillions or the bazillions, if you prefer, yet you make a mistake every 300th time that you try to generate a DNA profile, the bazillion number doesn't matter anymore. It gets swapped out by that chance of making a mistake," Krane said.
 
 This error rate is particularly concerning as it means that opportunities to generate useful investigative leads are missed. If a DNA sample is collected from a crime scene and there is no suspect, authorities search the CODIS database to find a match. However, every 300th time this is done, a lead is not generated, which Krane believes is an unacceptably high failure rate given the consequences of having a rapist or a murderer go without being apprehended.
 
 Krane suggested that one way to correct this could be by doing a pairwise comparison of the 13 million profiles in the federal database to determine if errors happen more frequently at one of the locations than others. "Maybe one of those loci just is more error-prone than others. Maybe the biology just doesn't work as well for that one locus. That one location. And when you do your database search, maybe you don't include that one, right? Or maybe you include it and this, but you factor in that you discount it because that one is just more prone to having a mistake," Krane suggested.
 
 Krane also expressed concern about the secrecy surrounding the CODIS database and suggested that more people in the correct positions should have access to it to identify more criminals and solve more cases. He also mentioned the development of probabilistic genotyping systems, expert systems used to interpret test results that human analysts find too complicated. These systems, while not openly shared due to stringent non-disclosure agreements, can distinguish between signal and noise, which is particularly useful when dealing with a small amount of DNA or a sample with many different contributors.
 
 While the expert systems may not explicitly use artificial intelligence (AI), they involve serious computer science undertakings with hundreds of thousands of lines of computer code. These systems may help reduce human error and improve the accuracy of DNA database searches, ultimately helping to catch more criminals and solve more cases.
 
 Krane's insights highlight the need for more transparency and improvement in the system to ensure that DNA databases are used to their fullest potential in solving crimes and catching criminals.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Brian Kohberger case, which has gripped the nation, saw a significant development recently as the defense, led by Ann Taylor, waived the right to a speedy trial. Psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott shared her insights on this development in a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast hosted by Tony Brueski. Scott, echoing the predictions of many TV attorneys, was unsurprised by the decision, positing that the psychological thrill of attention could be fueling Kohberger’s disposition.
 
Scott noted that Brian Kohberger, who is currently incarcerated, might not be suffering as one might expect. Instead, she suggested that he might be reveling in the attention and plotting strategies with his legal team to outmaneuver the evidence against him. "This is probably the most attention the guy has ever gotten in his life about anything," Scott noted. "He's probably not thinking about things like [the] life in prison or death penalty right now."
 
This notion challenges the conventional perception of the mental state of an accused in a high-profile murder case. Brueski, curious about the dynamics of control in the case, questioned Scott on who is steering the narrative: Kohberger, Taylor, or a combination of both. Scott theorized it to be a blend of the two, with Taylor willing to employ any strategy beneficial to her client and Kohberger content with prolonging the proceedings.
 
The defense's decision to waive the speedy trial, despite concerns about tainting the jury pool and damaging Kohberger’s reputation, was a topic of discussion. Brueski questioned if this decision, which opens the door to prolonged speculation, is a calculated risk expected to eventually work in Kohberger’s favor. Scott suggested that the defense must believe it to be advantageous, adding that there could hardly be more cumulative publicity than what has already been amassed.
 
As the conversation progressed, the discussion veered towards the potential emergence of individuals from Kohberger’s past who could bolster his defense. While Brueski acknowledged that more time allows for such possibilities, Scott expressed skepticism. She noted the already surfaced bizarre stories from Kohberger’s past, surmising that any positive testimony would have already emerged if it existed.
 
In summary, the recent waiver of a speedy trial in the Brian Kohberger case raises several intriguing questions. Is the accused reveling in the spotlight, and is this impacting the defense strategy? Who is in control of the narrative, and is the prolonged trial timeline a strategic move by the defense? Lastly, could the additional time yield new witnesses or evidence beneficial to Kohberger, or is it merely a delaying tactic? While the answers to these questions remain uncertain, what is clear is that the defense is prepared to scrutinize every aspect of the investigation, from law enforcement personnel to DNA evidence and genealogy processes, in their pursuit of acquittal.
 
As the case unfolds, it will be fascinating to observe how these strategies play out and what they reveal about the inner workings of the minds involved in this captivating legal battle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski was joined by retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke. The two discussed the recent waiving of a speedy trial for Bryan Kohberger by his attorney, Anne Taylor. This development raised a lot of speculation on the direction of the case, given that it removed the pressure of the tight October deadline.
 
 "I see her continually trying to do all she can to save his life," Dreeke said, speculating that the defense's actions point to a fear of the death penalty for Kohberger. The case has prompted curiosity regarding the control of the motions being filed; whether it's driven by Taylor, Kohberger, or a combination of both. There have been moments where Taylor's representation seemed exceptionally well-executed, while other times, it raised questions about the origin of certain strategies.
 
 Dreeke provided a unique perspective by comparing the dynamic to an author-writer relationship. "It's as if he's the author and she's his writer," he explained, emphasizing that while Taylor has the expertise, she can only work with the information provided by Kohberger. This dynamic might explain some of the more bizarre defense strategies, such as the 'driving alibi,' or the suggestion that evidence was planted.
 
 These strategies seem uncharacteristic for Taylor, based on her historical representation of clients, but it is suspected that Kohberger's input might be influencing the approach. Despite the limitations, Dreeke commended Taylor for doing her job well under the circumstances. "When you're working with very little, you're going to make the most out of what you can," he noted.
 
 The discussion also touched on the implications of waiving the speedy trial. Initially, Taylor sought small delays while keeping the clock moving toward the trial. However, the decision to waive the speedy trial suggests a change in strategy, possibly due to concerns about a tainted jury and negative media portrayal of Kohberger.
 
 Dreeke speculated that this change in tactic might be a desperate move to keep Kohberger alive as long as possible. "As the ludic of some of these ideas that she and he are coming up with... are kind of flushing out and going nowhere, let's let go of the speedy trial," Dreeke suggested. By prolonging the process, the defense might be hoping for new developments that could work in their favor.
 
 In summary, the waiving of the speedy trial for Bryan Kohberger marks a significant shift in the defense strategy. While the move raises questions about the dynamics between Kohberger and his attorney, Anne Taylor, it is clear that the defense is doing everything possible to avoid the death penalty. As the case progresses, it remains to be seen whether this change in tactic will ultimately benefit Kohberger in the long run.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke discussed the importance of expert witnesses in cases like that of the Kohberger trial. Dreeke emphasizes that in a case where the defendant, Kohberger, does not have any witnesses to support his timeline, the credibility of the prosecution’s expert witnesses is paramount.
 
 Brueski and Dreeke delved into the complexities of determining an expert witness’s credibility, discussing the case of Gabriela Vargas, a self-taught genetic genealogist who began working on cases in 2018. She was recently visited by the FBI, raising questions about her testimony's accuracy and credibility. Dreeke explains that an expert witness must demonstrate "reps" or repetitions in their given field, and the prosecution and defense must agree on their expertise, as must the judge.
 
 Dreeke suggests that Vargas's lack of a professional background and possible issues with her testimony may be reasons for the FBI's visit. He further elaborates that a judge, prosecution, and defense should meticulously assess an expert witness’s qualifications, repetitions, and presentation skills before they testify.
 
 Additionally, the defense filed a motion claiming that the press's failure to follow court directives regarding photography and recording interferes with Kohberger’s right to a fair trial. Dreeke agrees with the defense, as Kohberger’s appearance does not exude openness or agreeableness, which could negatively influence the jury. He suggests that the defense could negate this impact by explaining Kohberger's contemplative nature to the jury.
 
 Dreeke concludes by conjecturing that Kohberger, whether guilty or not, is likely contemplating ways to defend his life as if it were a science experiment. This analysis highlights the importance of carefully selecting expert witnesses and the potential implications of their credibility on a defendant's right to a fair trial.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," former FBI Special Agent and daily contributor Jennifer Coffindaffer joins host Tony Brueski to discuss the ongoing trial of Brian Kohberger and the strategies of his defense attorney, Anne Taylor. The conversation delves into Taylor's resistance to having cameras in the courtroom, the pain this case has caused the victim's families, and the potential outcomes of upcoming legal decisions.
 
 Taylor has been adamantly opposed to having cameras in the courtroom from the start, a point Coffindaffer notes might be due to Kohberger's unsettling appearance. Despite attempts to clean him up, Coffindaffer suggests that Kohberger has a "maniacal appearance," which Taylor may be trying to avoid showcasing to the public. Brueski and Coffindaffer also highlight the frustration and pain experienced by the victim's families as they witness the careful treatment of Kohberger compared to the grim reality they face of never seeing their children again.
 
 As the conversation progresses, Coffindaffer speculates on the actions likely to be taken by the defense and prosecution in the lead-up to the trial, following the decision to waive the speedy trial. She anticipates that the defense will file numerous motions in an attempt to withhold evidence from being introduced. Although she does not believe that the grand jury indictment will be overturned, Coffindaffer acknowledges that there is a real possibility that the judge might rule against having cameras in the courtroom. She also discusses the upcoming hearing on September 22nd, where the prosecution will need to address the 24 points made in Taylor's motion to dismiss, including an accusation that the prosecution withheld exculpatory information.
 
 Coffindaffer expresses confidence in the prosecution, stating that the prosecutor has decades of experience and a history of success in high-profile cases. She dismisses the notion that any malfeasance occurred on the prosecution's part, explaining that claims of withholding information are a routine defense tactic in pretrial settings. She recalls a recent hearing where the judge admonished Taylor for not believing the prosecutor's assertions, emphasizing that both parties are sworn court representatives.
 
 The discussion between Brueski and Coffindaffer sheds light on the complexities and emotional underpinnings of the Brian Kohberger case. From the challenges faced by the defense in managing Kohberger's public image to the heart-wrenching experiences of the victim's families, the case has been fraught with tension. As legal proceedings continue, all parties involved must navigate a landscape of legal technicalities, public perception, and the quest for justice.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Bryan Kohberger, a serial killer accused, is currently feeling the pressure as he waits for more time for his defense team to craft a more substantial defense. This was discussed in a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," a podcast by Tony Brueski featuring psychologist John Delatorre. Delatorre suggests that Kohberger might be experiencing anxiety as he waits, which he might turn into disdain, blaming others for the delay in his trial. Despite the popular belief that serial killers are devoid of emotions, Delatorre believes that they indeed feel emotions like anxiety and nervousness. He says, "I think he might be unwilling to allow himself to feel the vulnerable emotion of anxiety, of nervousness, and instead turns it outwards and probably blames everybody else for kind of getting in the way of him having a speedy trial."
 
 This raises a question on the defense team's strategy. Despite pushing for a speedy trial for quite some time, they suddenly waived the right when the moment arrived. Delatorre thinks that it was more trial tactics rather than an actual desire for a speedy trial. He believes it probably came to the last minute before they were able to convince Kohberger that waiving a right to a speedy trial was necessary to establish a solid defense.
 
 The discussion also touched upon the concern about pictures and videos of Kohberger in the courtroom, and whether it could affect a possible jury's attitude towards the case. Delatorre dispelled the notion that having knowledge of the case would influence a potential jury member's verdict rendering. He emphasized that a verdict should be rendered based on the evidence observed during the course of the trial, not on previous exposure. However, he acknowledges that people aren't robots, and their emotional experiences and decision-making processes will be colored by the material they have previously seen about Kohberger.
 
 With a myriad of pictures and videos of Kohberger already circulating the internet, the discussion questions whether it is a losing battle to argue against cameras in the courtroom. Delatorre argues that it might be more advantageous to coach Kohberger on how to appear more likable or less standoffish to the camera. He adds, "It can't just be that you look better or that you're more like, you have to look more human...You're supposed to be able to look like you have actual real emotions and you experience real emotions at appropriate times." Delatorre also highlights that attorneys often end up being the proxy of what they want their defendants to be, emphasizing the importance of how attorneys present themselves to the media.
 
 The episode shines a light on the psychological aspects that come into play in legal proceedings involving serial killers. From the emotions experienced by the accused to the strategies employed by the defense and the influence of media on potential jury members, it underscores the complexities involved in such high-profile cases. Delatorre's insights provide a valuable perspective on the challenges faced by all parties involved and the importance of considering the human element in the legal process.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Bryan Kohberger has chosen to waive his right to a speedy trial, a decision that has implications for how his case will progress. As Laurie Gilbertson, a former prosecutor, explains in the podcast 'Hidden Killers' with Tony Brueski, this move by the defense is unsurprising but unusual, as it comes with a host of potential consequences and advantages for both sides. Gilbertson provides a detailed insight into the potential legal strategies and ramifications of this decision, in a case involving multiple murders and a potential death penalty.
 
 Kohberger's decision to waive a speedy trial means that there is now no specific time frame in which the trial must commence. As Gilbertson notes, this waiver of speedy trial for an indefinite period is unusual, although understandable in a case with such high stakes. Both the defense and prosecution must be adequately prepared for a fair trial, and this decision provides both sides with additional time to prepare their cases.
 
 However, this decision does not come without its challenges. As Gilbertson highlights, an indefinite delay can lead to witnesses forgetting key details, and can prolong the agony for the victims' families who are seeking closure and justice. Despite this, she suggests that the delay is more advantageous for the defense, as the community and public, represented by the prosecution, are also entitled to a speedy trial. The judge must balance these concerns carefully, and ensure that the case does not drag on unnecessarily.
 
 While the waiver of a speedy trial removes certain time constraints, it does not absolve either side of their obligations. Both the prosecution and defense must continue to file motions, and the judge must hold necessary hearings. As Gilbertson emphasizes, despite the waiver, the judge must maintain a tight schedule, and ensure that frivolous motions are not tolerated. The defense, for example, must still provide any evidence they intend to present, such as an alibi, and the prosecution must turn over any exculpatory evidence.
 
 Ultimately, the speed of the trial proceedings rests with the judge, who has the authority to set the schedule and determine when the trial will commence. While the waiver of a speedy trial removes the obligation to start the trial within a certain time frame, it does not mean that the trial can be delayed indefinitely. Gilbertson stresses that this would be unfair to the prosecution, the public, and the community, and the judge must consider this in their decision-making.
 
 In death penalty cases, there is often heightened due process due to the severity of the potential outcome. This may result in the defense and prosecution being granted more time to prepare their cases, despite the legal requirement for all cases to be treated equally. As Gilbertson notes, while every criminal case must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and all parties are entitled to due process, the potential consequences in death penalty cases often necessitate additional time for preparation.
 
 As the Kohberger case progresses, the decision to waive the speedy trial will have significant implications for all parties involved. It will be crucial for the judge to maintain a fair and tight schedule, balancing the needs of both the defense and the prosecution, while also considering the impact on the community and the victims' families. Gilbertson's insights provide a valuable perspective on the legal strategies and considerations involved in such high-stakes cases.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers" hosted by Tony Brueski, a critical discussion took place with psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott concerning the vetting and qualification of expert witnesses in trials. A focal point of this conversation was the recent testimony of Gabriela Vargas, a self-taught genetic genealogist who also runs a carpentry business and cares for a pet cockatoo, notable characteristics that paint a rather unconventional picture of an 'expert witness.'
 
 The discussion was primarily centered around the process by which expert witnesses are vetted and the criteria that ultimately deem them qualified for court testimony. Scott explained, "In the cases I've been involved in... expert witnesses have to present their CV and their history... under cross-examination. The opposing side has the right to question and challenge." The court is then responsible for determining the acceptance of the individual as an expert.
 
 This conversation prompted questions regarding the effectiveness and thoroughness of the system, and whether the bar for qualification is set high enough. Although Scott noted she has never witnessed a judge decline an expert witness, she also observed that challenges to their body of knowledge are quite common. This led her to speculate, "It may be that the bar is not terribly high, and I think that probably depends on the judge."
 
 The relevance and timeliness of this discussion were underscored by the recent events surrounding Vargas, who was visited by the FBI shortly after her testimony. Although the exact reason for the visit remains unknown, it fueled speculation that there might be underlying issues with the experts being called into the hearing. Brueski and Scott delved into the possibility that some individuals might be enticed to testify in high-profile cases for the publicity, regardless of their actual expertise or relevance to the case. Scott emphasized the role of personal ethics in such situations, stating, "It varies by the integrity of each individual."
 
 The conversation later shifted to a recent motion filed by the defense attorney of Bryan Kohberger to remove cameras from the courtroom. The motion contended that the images and recordings of Kohberger interfered with his right to a fair trial. This move was somewhat surprising given Kohberger's composed and well-presented demeanor in court. However, Scott suggested that the defense might be concerned about subtle, unintentional expressions that could be misconstrued or negatively impact the perception of Kohberger.
 
 Ultimately, the episode highlighted the complexities and potential pitfalls of the current legal system, from the qualification of expert witnesses to the impact of courtroom images on a defendant's right to a fair trial. As the legal landscape continues to evolve, conversations like these are crucial in ensuring a fair and just system for all parties involved.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers" featuring former FBI Special Agent and daily contributor, Jennifer Coffindaffer, discussed the role of expert witnesses in the case of Brian Kohberger. The hosts, Tony Brueski and Jennifer Coffindaffer, delved into the credibility and quality of expert witnesses being called upon for the defense, particularly Gabriela Vargas, a self-taught genetic genealogist.
 
 Vargas, a seemingly unconventional choice for an expert witness, runs her own carpentry business and cares for her pet cockatoo. Her credibility was further questioned when it was revealed that the FBI visited her after her testimony. According to Coffindaffer, the visit was prompted by the prosecutor, who expressed concerns about parts of Vargas' testimony that she may have recanted before her peers, as well as her concerns about the declaration she signed.
 
 Brueski and Coffindaffer discussed the implications of an expert witness reneging on their support, and how it can be indicative of the challenges faced by the defense in finding experts who support their position. The hosts speculated that the ambiguous nature of the reneged testimony and the overall quality of the expert witnesses could potentially be due to budget constraints.
 
 Coffindaffer highlighted the challenges that arise when a defense has a limited budget for expert witnesses, forcing them to spread the funds thinly across multiple experts, potentially leading to a lower quality of experts. She explained, "If your budget is a hundred thousand dollars for an expert and you choose to bring on four experts...now you're down to 25,000 per expert, so those expert fees are very small."
 
 The hosts also discussed the impact that such incidents could have on other potential expert witnesses, questioning whether the involvement of the FBI and the notoriety of the case might deter or attract experts. Coffindaffer pointed out that while some experts might be drawn to the case due to its high-profile nature, others might be wary of associating with a losing side or having their expertise questioned by opposing experts.
 
 The case of Brian Kohberger is a high-stakes trial that requires a robust defense, and the choice of expert witnesses is crucial in building a solid case. The incident with Vargas raises concerns about the quality and credibility of the expert witnesses being called upon by the defense, and whether budget constraints are impacting the quality of the defense. Ultimately, expert witnesses need to carefully consider their involvement in high-profile cases like this, weighing the potential benefits of notoriety against the risks of damaging their reputation.
 
 In conclusion, the episode of "Hidden Killers" highlighted the critical role of expert witnesses in legal proceedings, and the challenges faced by the defense in securing credible and supportive experts. The incident with Gabriela Vargas underscores the importance of carefully selecting expert witnesses and the potential implications of budget constraints on the quality of the defense. As the trial progresses, the quality and credibility of expert witnesses will continue to be a key focus and could play a decisive role in the outcome of the case.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The defense team for Bryan Kohberger has raised concerns about the possibility of a tainted jury, due to the amount of information already in the public domain. According to the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski and former prosecutor Laurie Gilbertson, the defense is worried that potential jurors have already heard and know too much about Kohberger. The defense has made many comments and complaints about the situation, and they were the side that requested a gag order to prevent any further information from coming out from either side or even the victim's families.
 
 “It’s interesting here because the defense… asked for there not to be anything coming out from either side or even the victim's families. So that would really lead to not at all tainting the jury pool,” said Gilbertson. Despite the concerns, Gilbertson believes that the court has taken appropriate precautions, including the gag order, to ensure the jury pool is not tainted. “I don’t think that concerns from the defense regarding a tainted jury pool are really that valid here,” she added.
 
 Another point of discussion on the podcast was the use of expert witnesses, especially those whose expertise could be questionable. For example, the case involved a self-taught genealogist, Gabriela Vargas, who began working on cases just in 2018. Despite being relatively new to the field and running a carpentry business as a side hustle, she was called upon as an expert witness. Brueski raised questions about the validity of such experts, saying, “Should there be stricter rules on who's getting up on the stand and claiming to be an expert?”
 
 Gilbertson explained that the process of qualifying an expert involves going through their work experience, education, publications, peer-reviewed papers, teaching experience, and the specificity and backing of their expertise. After this, the opposing side has an opportunity to cross-examine, and then the judge makes a determination on whether the person can be deemed an expert. “This person, I will deem them an expert… they are able to offer an opinion to the jury that the jury can then consider that will be relevant, that will be credible, and that is based on all of their knowledge and experience,” she explained.
 
 However, Gilbertson also noted that while legally an expert opinion holds no greater weight than a layperson's, the public perception may differ. “Calling someone an expert in lay terms tends to kind of give the public that idea. So, yeah. Can that taint the jury pool? In my opinion, it doesn't taint it too well for the person calling her as an expert,” she remarked.
 
 In the end, regardless of what is heard outside the courtroom, the jury will be instructed about all these matters by the judge, who will clarify what it means if someone is called or denied being called an expert. This, Gilbertson believes, will ensure that the jury makes decisions based on clear and accurate information.
 
 As the trial for Bryan Kohberger continues, concerns about a tainted jury and the qualifications of expert witnesses remain key issues that the court must navigate carefully to ensure a fair trial. Whether or not the defense’s concerns are well-founded, it is clear that the court is taking precautions to address these issues and ensure a fair and just process for all parties involved.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The ongoing Bryan Kohlberger case has recently entered a new phase, with an increasing number of motions being filed by both sides. One particular issue that has come under scrutiny is the presence of cameras in the court, with some of the filings specifically mentioning inappropriate focus on Kohberger's crotch. Defense Attorney Bob Motta, host of the podcast Defense Diaries, recently shared his thoughts on this and other aspects of the case on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski.

Motta explained that with the removal of the speedy trial demand, both the state and defense have been under less pressure, allowing them to fully engage in traditional motion work. This involves going through all discovery materials and deciding whether to file motions such as motions to suppress or quash. However, Motta pointed out that the recent motion work is just a fraction of what is expected in a death penalty case like this one.

On the camera issue, Motta predicted that the judge might limit pretrial coverage to avoid tainting the jury pool, a known problem in high-profile cases. Some lawyers in the area believe that the trial should not be moved to a different venue, and Motta agreed, noting that in Idaho, changing the venue would not involve changing the prosecutor or judge, only the location. He also mentioned that importing a jury might be a more cost-efficient and logistically feasible option given the massive undertaking of transporting evidence.

While discussing the trial proceedings, Motta emphasized the importance of getting it right the first time to avoid putting the victims' families through the ordeal again. This involves both sides agreeing to a fair trial, which could involve importing a jury from a different county.

As for the recent scheduling hearing, two motions to dismiss the indictment were scheduled for September 22nd. The first motion alleges a biased grand jury, inadmissible evidence, lack of sufficient evidence to prosecute, and prosecutorial misconduct. Although this motion will be sealed, Motta predicted that both motions would ultimately be denied. The second motion, which will be open to the public, involves a legal argument regarding the Idaho Constitution's language on the standard required to bind someone over for trial. The defense argues that the constitution requires a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, while the Supreme Court of Idaho's criminal rules specify a "probable cause" standard.

Motta shared his belief that the defense attorney had been waiting for an opportunity to litigate this constitutional argument, which could have far-reaching implications if successful. However, he clarified that even if the motions were granted, Kohlberg would not be released; the prosecution would likely simply re-indict him.

Overall, the Kohberger case continues to evolve with various legal intricacies and challenges that will likely have a significant impact on the final outcome. As both sides prepare for the upcoming hearings, it remains to be seen how the court will address these complex issues and move forward towards a resolution that ensures justice for all parties involved.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Bryan Kohberger's case is taking another interesting twist as the defense attorney prepares for a series of motions leading up to the trial. The focus of these motions will be on challenging the use of DNA evidence obtained through the IgG database, as detailed in the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and defense attorney Bob Motta, host of the "Defense Diaries" podcast.
 
 Motta predicts that the defense will file a motion to suppress the DNA evidence or to quash the arrest, arguing that law enforcement accessed private databases, which is not allowed. However, the prosecution contends that they are not using the IgG profile but have Kohberger's DNA and know it matches what was found on the crime scene.
 
 The argument here centers on the expectation of privacy in one's DNA, and by extension, their family's DNA. Motta passionately argues that there is a privacy expectation in our family's DNA, contrasting it with sending a text message, where one voluntarily relinquishes their privacy. However, one does not have control over their family's DNA, making it a different and novel argument.
 
 With advancements in technology making it easier for law enforcement to access genealogical information, Motta asserts the necessity of putting a "governor" on how this technology is used. He advocates for a requirement of probable cause and a search warrant before law enforcement can access IgG databases or any non-private databases. This would prevent law enforcement from bypassing traditional methods and relying solely on DNA, which can be easily transferred and create a dangerous, slippery slope if not regulated.
 
 Motta also predicts that if Kohberger made a statement to law enforcement, a motion to suppress the statement might be filed, depending on the circumstances. However, the main focus remains on the Fourth Amendment attack on the DNA evidence.
 
 The upcoming battles over the admissibility of evidence in pretrial motions will be crucial in shaping the trial. Motta explains that the real war in any trial is fought in the pretrial motion phase, as it determines what evidence will be included or excluded at trial. He anticipates a lot of motion work and stresses the importance of these battles, suggesting they should be televised as they play a significant role in the trial's outcome.
 
 Ultimately, Motta believes that the issue of privacy expectation in family DNA needs to be decided at the Supreme Court level, as it is a matter of interpretation of law and could have wide-reaching impacts on civil liberties and law enforcement powers. Even if a statute is made, it will still need to be litigated to be fleshed out, highlighting the necessity for the highest court to weigh in on this significant issue.
 
 As the case progresses, it remains to be seen how the court will rule on these motions and what impact it will have on the trial and future cases involving DNA evidence. The discussions on the "Hidden Killers" podcast provide an insightful analysis of the legal strategies and arguments that will be made in this case, shedding light on the complexities and implications of using advanced technology in criminal investigations.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The University of Idaho has once again postponed the demolition of the Moscow residence where four students tragically lost their lives in November. This delay has become indefinite due to the recent postponement of the murder suspect Bryan Kohberger's trial. University officials have decided to maintain their earlier decision to defer the demolition of the off-campus property on King Road. The university, which took ownership of the house earlier this year, is committed to withholding demolition activities until at least mid-December. The institution is currently without a specific demolition date and lacks established plans for the property's future. The university spokesperson emphasized their commitment to balancing students' education with respecting the memories of the victims. Bryan Kohberger, the murder suspect, faces serious charges, including four counts of first-degree murder, and the university faced opposition from some victims' families who expressed concerns about destroying the property before Kohberger's trial concluded.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, a heated discussion was brought to the forefront regarding an expert witness who had allegedly recanted their testimony. Special guest, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, joined in to unpack the complexities surrounding the bizarre twists and turns of the case.
 
 Brueski began, "So what does one do when the expert witness that you hired to come testify goes back to office workplace and starts recanting their testimony to coworkers? Allegedly." It's a perplexing scenario, especially considering the gravity of the case at hand. This unexpected development even led to a visit from the FBI to one of the individuals in the Kohberger expert witness camp.
 
 Dreeke, who specializes in behavior and counterintelligence, expressed his confusion: "And yet the biggest thing that struck me with this one, I don't know why the FBI interviewed them. This is not an FBI investigation." Why would the prosecutor ask two FBI agents to interview Gabriela Vargas, the expert in question, instead of local authorities or state officials handling the matter?
 
 Brueski added, "It sounds real official. It sounds, oh, we're gonna get to the bottom of this because we're sending two FBI agents to go and question her about it." However, the more they delved into the situation, the more unanswered questions seemed to emerge.
 
 Another element adding to the puzzling nature of the case is Anne Taylor, who seems to be making a significant issue out of certain aspects. As Dreeke pointed out, "I think she does all she can, she's part of it, you know, she's the writer, he's the author, and they're coming up with their methodologies." Could there be underlying reasons for their strategies?
 
 In another bizarre twist, there's speculation over a video clip that apparently shows Brian Kohberger entering the courtroom with his fly partially zipped. Brueski remarked, "Are they just kind of grasping at anything and trying to get the cameras out with any reason they can possibly go for right now?" Dreeke concurred, saying that the defense seems to be "shooting a shotgun and hoping one of the pellets hits."
 
 Drawing on his expertise in human behavior, Dreeke posited that the defense's tactic is consistent: "They're going to continue to do it right up until I think the trial. Because this is their behavior arc of constantly picking, going." They aim to sow doubt in the jury, hoping that amidst the plethora of information, one seed might resonate with a juror.
 
 Brueski raised another pertinent question, "So delaying this now and who knows when it will end up actually going to trial next year, the following?" Both agreed that delaying the trial could be a strategic move by the defense. As Dreeke said, "That also gives them more time to try and get death off the table. I think so."
 
 In conclusion, the Kohberger case continues to confound, raising more questions than answers. From expert witnesses recanting their testimonies to questionable FBI involvement, each twist makes the path to justice increasingly complex. With the trial's future still uncertain, one can only hope that clarity will eventually prevail.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a startling conversation on the acclaimed podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski delved into the intriguing and tumultuous defense strategies surrounding Bryan Kohberger. Unconventional expert witnesses, questions about the FBI's involvement, and the unforgettable "crotch incident" have catapulted the case into the spotlight. The conversation, featuring insights from psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott, reveals more than meets the eye.
 
 As Brueski dissected, the defense's approach seems somewhat desperate. "With so much evidence, DNA included, it just seems they're trying anything and everything they can," Brueski observed. The unexpected entry of an expert witness with an "odd demeanor" raised several eyebrows, leading many to question the credibility and authenticity of her claims. Scott echoed these sentiments, highlighting her unusual appearance and the inherent biases that might influence jurors: "Having an eccentric appearance does not bode well... there's meaning in it."
 
 Further intensifying the mystery surrounding this witness, the FBI took the unexpected step of interviewing her following rumors that she recanted parts of her testimony post-hearing. Prosecutor Bill Thompson's directive to "figure out what is happening" indicates the gravity of the situation, though the FBI's direct involvement remains puzzling to many. As Brueski relayed from a conversation with a former FBI agent, Robin Dreeke, "Why is the FBI coming in, why would it not be just like a local investigator?"
 
 Scott and Brueski speculated on potential hidden aspects of the witness's life, suggesting there might be undisclosed factors that have elevated her role in this high-profile case. Scott’s perspective as a psychotherapist brings another dimension to the debate, hinting that the witness's "eccentric appearance" and the decision to have brightly colored hair, particularly in a field demanding gravitas, might communicate deeper psychological nuances.
 
 However, aside from the expert witness's unusual presentation, questions about her experience in the field also emerged. Starting her professional journey only in 2018 and being largely self-taught, doubts arose concerning the depth of her expertise. Brueski voiced the concerns many are thinking, "How much of an expert can one truly be... especially when we're talking about putting someone away for life or death?"
 
 The trial has also been peppered with seemingly unrelated distractions, one being Anne Taylor's repeated references to Bryan Kohberger's "crotch incident" in the courtroom. Brueski and Scott mused on the potential reasons behind such a focus, especially when the primary issue should be the case itself. Brueski remarked, "If he was on trial for stealing a kitten and his fly was down, people would be focusing on that."
 
 The delay of the trial, while frustrating for many, could offer strategic benefits for the defense. With the added time, there's the potential to shift the focus away from the death penalty, a primary concern given the evidence stacked against Kohberger. As Scott pointed out, it will likely benefit the defense to have this extended preparation window.
 
 However, who is genuinely calling the shots remains an enigma. Is it Anne Taylor, the defense attorney, or the enigmatic Bryan Kohberger himself? Scott concluded, "One would think that in a case like this, the attorney would be the one really making the big decisions... but every so often you have a defendant who's just really unusual."
 
 The full depth of the Bryan Kohberger trial is yet to be unearthed, and the peculiarities surrounding it only deepen the intrigue. As Scott aptly stated, maybe one day a comprehensive account will be written, offering a window into the behind-the-scenes machinations of this riveting case.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a striking turn of events, former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer has offered fresh insights on the Bryan Kohberger case. Highlighting grave implications regarding the veracity of expert testimonies and FBI involvement, Coffindaffer delves into a puzzling episode where an expert witness appears to recant earlier statements. The complexities and potential repercussions of this development have shaken the foundation of an already high-profile case.
 
 Tony Brueski, host of "Hidden Killers," recently sat down with Coffindaffer to discuss the perplexing incident involving defense attorney Anne Taylor's expert witness, Ms. Vargas. The FBI's intervention immediately after the genetic genealogy expert's testimony in court has raised eyebrows. "Why was it the FBI that had to make the visit to her? Why would it not have been local law enforcement?" Brueski questioned. The move signaled the "severity and ginormousness of this case," according to Coffindaffer.
 
 Coffindaffer explained, "The reason the FBI was called, I believe, is we know that there were 60 full-time agents assigned to this case." She further highlighted the incredible pressure on these agents, many of whom might be handling up to 50 cases simultaneously. The intensity of the FBI's involvement underscores the case's significance and their pivotal role, she stated.
 
 A concerning revelation in the conversation was a parallel drawn with the Murdoch case, where sworn testimonies appeared compromised. "We have a clerk that was interviewed after the fact, and now there's some very egregious and disturbing allegations... And now we have really other similar type allegations in this case," Coffindaffer said. The gravity of potentially misleading sworn testimonies can significantly impact judicial decisions, particularly concerning a suspect's guilt or innocence.
 
 Adding to the drama, Ms. Vargas might have signed a statement she either did not fully read or perhaps disagreed with. Coffindaffer raised essential questions about Ms. Vargas's credibility and the implications for the Kohberger trial: "She was called as an expert... she could be used in the future, in the trial to provide expert testimony regarding the genetic genealogy and the DNA." The need to clarify her stance is imperative, especially if she's summoned again during the trial.
 
 Another captivating detail that emerged was defense attorney Anne Taylor's efforts to exclude cameras from the courtroom. Brueski and Coffindaffer speculate that Taylor might be seizing on any available opportunity, even highlighting seemingly trivial issues, to achieve this objective. "Anne Taylor is going to grasp at any possible straw to keep cameras out," Coffindaffer remarked. A recent Twitter image focusing on a minor wardrobe malfunction of Kohberger further stoked this debate.
 
 The unfolding intricacies of the Kohberger case, punctuated by potential testimonial inconsistencies and the unprecedented involvement of the FBI, further underline its high stakes and societal significance. As more details emerge, the spotlight remains firmly on the veracity of expert witnesses, the immense pressures on law enforcement agencies, and the ever-present influence of media in shaping public perception. Amidst these swirling controversies, one thing is clear: the quest for truth and justice remains paramount.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

On Wednesday, September 13th, 2023, a hearing was convened to deliberate on the presence of cameras during the courtroom proceedings of the Bryan Kohberger quadruple murder trial. Kohberger, a Ph.D. student from Washington State, stands accused of the heinous stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students in November 2022. His defense attorney contends that the use of cameras in courtrooms has become excessively pervasive. The presiding judge concluded the session by affirming his commitment to serving the interests of both the public and the involved parties. A definitive ruling on the matter will be announced in due course.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode of 'Murder in the Morning,' hosts Tony Brueski and Stacy Cole embark on a chilling exploration of the unsettling parallels between accused killer Bryan Kohberger and the notorious serial killer Ted Bundy. With a meticulous and in-depth analysis, they delve into the eerie similarities between these two individuals, offering a disturbing look into the minds of these cold-blooded murderers.

The episode begins with Tony and Stacy setting the stage by introducing both Bryan Kohberger and Ted Bundy. They provide listeners with essential background information on both individuals, emphasizing their seemingly normal exteriors that masked their sinister intentions. The hosts highlight how both Kohberger and Bundy managed to blend into society, making it difficult for anyone to suspect their dark inclinations.

The heart of the episode lies in the meticulous dissection of Bryan Kohberger's behaviors, patterns, and mindset. Tony and Stacy draw chilling comparisons to Bundy's infamous criminal profile, pointing out specific behaviors and traits that align disturbingly with those exhibited by Bundy during his reign of terror. They discuss Kohberger's alleged modus operandi, victim selection, and the gruesome details of his crimes, all while drawing parallels to Bundy's methodology.

Throughout the episode, Tony and Stacy engage in a captivating conversation that goes beyond the surface-level similarities. They touch upon theories related to psychopathy, narcissism, and the role of childhood experiences in shaping such monstrous personalities.

Listeners are taken on a thought-provoking journey that challenges their understanding of human nature and the depths of depravity that some individuals can sink to. The hosts provide insights into the complexities of criminal profiling and the challenges of identifying potential threats within society.

In conclusion, this episode of 'Murder in the Morning' promises to be a riveting discourse for true crime aficionados. It offers a captivating, albeit chilling, exploration of the terrifying similarities between alleged killer Bryan Kohberger and Ted Bundy, shedding light on the darkest corners of the human psyche. Tony Brueski and Stacy Cole's meticulous analysis and thought-provoking discussions make this episode a must-listen for anyone intrigued by the macabre world of serial killers and the mysteries of criminal behavior. 
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is the way we interact on social media inadvertently exposing us to unseen dangers? This was the critical issue dissected during a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, where retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, shared his insights.
 
 Steve Gonsalves, a grieving father seeking justice for his daughter's tragic death, recently revealed that Bryan Koberger, the accused in the case, might have been tracking victims, including Maddie Mogen, on social media platforms. Slater County Sheriff Richard Skiles confirmed that Koberger had interacted with Mogen's Instagram posts. Although the true nature and depth of this interaction remain elusive, the discussion pivoted to the broader, and often unspoken, risks inherent to social media.
 
 Dreeke commented on the fine line between stalking and merely observing on platforms like Instagram. "Stalking is a powerful word... it's not stalking, according to the technical terms... it's a lot more than this. But targeted? Yes," Dreeke clarified. The insidiousness of being "targeted" was emphasized. Users may unknowingly be on someone's radar, not as admirers but as subjects of a far darker interest.
 
 The conversation shifted to the grim reality of how personal photos, even those seemingly innocent in nature, can be misused. "Oh yeah, there's a lot more than [you think]. It would creep you out if some of the people that are putting their photos out there knew what people were doing with them," warned Dreeke. He recounted his time with the Innocent Lives Foundation, where he witnessed firsthand how everyday images—children at the beach or a gymnastics meet—were manipulated, sexualized, and traded on the dark web.
 
 For many, the question arises: why do users seem oblivious to the potential threats lurking in the shadows of their social media profiles? Dreeke offers a perspective rooted in psychology. The immediate gratification, the validation from likes and comments, he argues, often masks the underlying risks. "It's our own insecurities and need for that constant approval and validation [that] will overwrite... the fear we may have from the people we never even see."
 
 Brueski and Dreeke's conversation underscored a pervasive, and sometimes overlooked, challenge of the digital age: navigating the balance between online engagement and personal safety. The dangers are not limited to overtly suggestive posts. The content we deem innocuous can also attract malicious intent.
 
 Dreeke's advice hinged on introspection and seeking external perspectives: "Ask yourself, is this a healthy relationship? Is this a healthy way to interact with the world?" He suggested confiding in "loving critics" for honest feedback on one's online behavior, emphasizing the ultimate pursuit of genuine, fulfilling relationships as a route to happiness.
 
 The podcast episode, while shedding light on a specific tragedy, opened up a broader discourse on the complexities and unseen dangers of our digital interactions. In an era where the quest for online validation is ever-pervasive, it serves as a stark reminder that safety and self-awareness must remain at the forefront.
 
 In conclusion, a question lingers: In the age of digital interconnectedness, are we too engrossed in the fleeting satisfaction of likes and comments to recognize the hidden risks lurking just a click away?

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The world of crime has a new playground, and it seems to be our beloved social media. In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," hosted by Tony Brueski with former FBI Special Agent and show regular Jennifer Coffindaffer, the possibility of social media's role in a high-profile criminal case was broached. Bryan Kohberger's actions, particularly on Instagram, have raised eyebrows and questions regarding his potential involvement in stalking several girls.
 
 Kohberger's name might ring a bell for those who have been following crime stories in recent years. The case has become one of the most debated on various platforms, with Mr. and Mrs. Gonsalves notably vocal about their views, given the heart-wrenching loss of their daughter. Recently, Mrs. Gonsalves made an unsettling revelation, stating that they had found Kohberger allegedly following some of the girls on Instagram.
 
 "The Instagram accounts have since gone offline," Brueski notes, suggesting that the links vanished shortly after the beginning of the year. Coffindaffer weighed in with her insight, "Very early on, many, including myself, were trolling Instagram to find any social media connection. We found that connection but hesitated to claim it outright due to potential misinformation."
 
 False leads and fabricated information are, unfortunately, commonplace in many high-profile cases. Coffindaffer points to similar scenarios in the Idaho case and Gabby Petito's case. "There is so much that you can find, and then it ends up being contrived."
 
 However, what stood out in the conversation was the unwavering conviction of the Gonsalves. As Coffindaffer asserts, the Gonsalves have "absolutely no reason to lie." Their intent is clear – to ensure the truth emerges and justice prevails. They, along with countless others, believe Kohberger is responsible for the heinous act that befell their child.
 
 Yet, a concerning undercurrent exists, where certain groups on social media vocally support Kohberger's innocence. "There's a pro-Kohberger alliance," Coffindaffer states, emphasizing the influence and reach these groups have on platforms like hers.
 
 The podcast episode didn’t only focus on the digital aspects. There was an equally compelling debate on the treatment Kohberger has received during his trials. While comparing Kohberger's legal proceedings with those of Richard Allen, another criminal with a notorious reputation, Brueski and Coffindaffer observed a glaring disparity. Richard Allen appeared in court shackled, wearing a jumpsuit and surrounded by officers, while Kohberger seemingly received preferential treatment, showing up in suits and looking groomed.
 
 "It seems like it really shows the vast differences we can have from jurisdiction to jurisdiction," Brueski said, pinpointing the inconsistency in how suspects are treated.
 
 Coffindaffer echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the need for equity in these situations, "It should be fair across the board. Innocent until proven guilty."
 
 Another enigmatic element of the conversation revolved around "Papa Roger," a mysterious online entity believed by some to be Kohberger. While earlier investigations seemed to tie Papa Roger to Kohberger due to the details shared, Coffindaffer has her reservations, mainly due to differences in writing styles between the two accounts.
 
 In the ever-evolving world of social media and its implications in real-world scenarios, the Kohberger case serves as a cautionary tale. As audiences grapple with the revelations from the "Hidden Killers" podcast, one can't help but wonder: How much more are we unaware of in the digital footprints of criminals?

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In an ongoing investigation concerning the gruesome murders of four University of Idaho students, police have delved deep into the digital trails left behind by the prime suspect, Bryan Kohberger. New court documents reveal that investigators have zeroed in on Kohberger's online searches, particularly focusing on queries related to knives.
 
 The importance of this digital probe stems from the fact that all four victims were tragically stabbed to death. Authorities are yet to locate the murder weapon, which is a crucial piece of evidence in tying the case together. Kohberger, the individual at the heart of this chilling case, made an appearance in court in Moscow, Idaho on September 13, 2023. The primary question at the moment is: Could his online search histories provide the much-needed clues in this puzzling case?
 
 "Understanding a suspect's digital footprints can often lead to breakthroughs in investigations," says a source familiar with such probes. And in Kohberger's case, this might just hold the key.
 
 Documents uploaded to Kohberger's case docket this week provided insight into the depths of the investigation. Apart from the Amazon search history, which is at the center of this probe, other digital platforms are also under the scanner. Warrants have been issued for Kohberger's data across a range of platforms including Apple, Paypal/Venmo, Spotify, and YouTube.
 
 Delving deeper into the details, the Latah County police in Idaho explicitly sought Amazon's assistance for "detailed customer click activity pertaining to knives and accessories" for specific periods in 2022 - from March 20 to March 30 and again from Nov. 1 to Dec. 6. From the looks of it, the tech giant has been cooperative, forwarding the relevant information to the authorities.
 
 Reflecting on the victims, they were identified as Kaylee Goncalves, 21, Madison Mogen, 21, Xana Kernodle, 20, and Ethan Chapin, 20. Each of them faced a violent end at the blade of a knife. Adding to the eerie nature of the crime, police have purportedly discovered Kohberger's DNA on a knife sheath, intensifying their search for any evidence pointing to him purchasing a large knife compatible with the sheath.
 
 "The digital age brings with it a plethora of data, making it harder for suspects to cover their tracks fully," comments a criminologist, highlighting the importance of examining digital histories in modern crime-solving.
 
 Subsequent warrants served to Apple on August 1, were quite comprehensive. The authorities demanded exhaustive account information that encompassed emails, attachments, instant messages, and even data stored in iCloud. By August 9, this trove of information was in the hands of law enforcement, as per the filing.
 
 The magnifying glass also extended over Kohberger's Paypal/Venmo activities. Investigators requested specific data ranging from screen names to billing information, concentrating on a period from June 22 to Dec. 31, 2022. It's notable that this timeline is right up to a day before the dramatic arrest of Kohberger at his parents' residence in Pennsylvania.
 
 As the story unfolds, Bryan Kohberger, originally a Pennsylvania native and a criminology student at Washington State University in Pullman, is facing grave charges. He's been indicted on four counts of first-degree murder in relation to the University of Idaho slayings.
 
 As the digital web tightens around the case, it remains to be seen if Kohberger's online traces will shed light on the dark events that transpired, leading to the tragic demise of four young students. As the world watches with bated breath, the role of technology in crime and investigation is once again brought to the forefront. How many more secrets do these online histories hold? Only time will tell.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

"What does it mean to be a survivor, a key witness in a high-profile crime, and then subjected to public scrutiny and judgment?"
 
 On a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski delved into a conversation with retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, regarding the tragic case of Dylan Mortensen and her involvement as a key witness.
 
 Dylan Mortensen, a surviving roommate of a heinous crime that transpired in her own residence, has been at the center of public judgment and critique over the past year. While the tragic events have traumatized her, the aftermath of online trolling, criticism, and bullying seems equally harrowing. The crucial question posed was about her role as a witness, specifically regarding the upcoming trial against Bryan Kohberger, the prime suspect in the case. Dreeke underscored her role stating, "She can play a hugely critical role."
 
 However, what is disheartening is the trauma Dylan faces in light of public opinion. As Dreeke empathically points out, the trauma of witnessing a murder is profound, something that has an enduring impact on the psyche. Comparing it to the pain of loss through natural causes or even accidents, he elaborates, "Murder is really the most profound way to lose someone."
 
 Brueski also touched on a disturbing trend - the inclination for people online to attack victims or those tangentially associated with tragic events. Drawing parallels with conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones targeting the Sandy Hook families, the discussion delved into the psychology behind such behaviors. Dreeke's insights were poignant: those who verbally assault and judge others, especially victims of tragedies, are often acting out their own pain and trauma. The need to "be seen" drives these individuals, amplified by the platforms that social media offers.
 
 He said, "When someone's coming at you like that, it's not about you… They're literally just trying to be seen because of their own pain and trauma." He also attributes this behavior to an increasing inability of individuals to cope with personal challenges, leading them to lash out at others as a coping mechanism.
 
 The conversation then shifted to the impending trial and the challenges faced by key witnesses like Dylan. Time, memory degradation, and emotional trauma play significant roles in how witnesses are perceived in court, and how defense attorneys might approach their testimonies. While time can indeed erode certain memories, Dreeke confidently affirmed, "When you experience something so traumatic...your memory of it is extremely vivid."
 
 Looking ahead at the trial, both Brueski and Dreeke pondered on the strategy that the defense might adopt. Given that Dylan's account of the incident was recorded shortly after it transpired, Dreeke believes it holds significant weight. However, he speculates that the defense might focus on attacking the scientific evidence rather than the emotional testimonies to maintain an emotionally neutral angle.
 
 "How will the memories of that traumatic night and the subsequent scrutiny from society shape Dylan Mortensen's testimony, and will the defense's strategies succeed in casting doubt on the credibility of key witnesses like her?"
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is the internet breeding ground for the worst of human nature? A closer look at the recent online attacks against Dylan Mortensen, a survivor of a harrowing attack, gives us some sobering insights.
 
 The forthcoming book by the parents of Dylan Mortensen, a survivor of a traumatic crime that shook the nation about a year ago, has rekindled interest in the incident. Tony Brueski, the host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, delves into the heart of the situation in a recent conversation with psychotherapist and author, Shavaun Scott.
 
 Dylan, according to Brueski's account, was one of the rare few who saw the alleged perpetrator, Brian Kohberger, depart the crime scene. This revelation has caused a lot of stir, and the legal implications of her testimony could be significant. The discussion, however, veers into an alarming trend that the young woman has faced since the incident – online harassment.
 
 Scott states, "...she's been targeted left and right... pain and suffering are certainly what she's going through..." It's a distressing reality that survivors, instead of receiving support and empathy, become the targets of online bullying. Why does this occur, and what compels people to behave in such a manner? Scott ponders, "...why some people get this sense of power when they're behind a keyboard... These are very unhappy people and they're angry about a lot of other things."
 
 The internet's vast expanse and the anonymity it provides seem to be a potent concoction that emboldens many to lash out without fear of consequence. As Brueski succinctly puts it, "We're in a weird place in society right now where everyone has a megaphone and anyone who wants to go and express whatever nonsense is in their mind, they can go and do it." The vicious online attacks on Dylan parallel the conspiracy theories and targeted harassment faced by the families of Sandy Hook, a horrifying incident that still evokes strong emotions.
 
 The larger question here is the future of our digital interactions. With platforms that give everyone a voice, will we see more constructive discussions or destructive harassment? Scott appears rather skeptical about the possibility of change, highlighting the disturbing trend where people, empowered by anonymity, indulge in reckless behavior. She remarks, "...it just seems like people are empowered by anonymity, and they can look for targets, and it's just become a way of life for so many people."
 
 A concerning observation is the increasing number of individuals who seem to derive a perverse pleasure from online trolling and bullying. The grim reality is that, for some, this malicious behavior has evolved into a hobby. The rise of figures like Alex Jones, known for peddling conspiracy theories and falsehoods, only serves to underscore the challenges of the digital age.
 
 Brueski's discussion with Scott is a poignant reminder of the pitfalls of our interconnected world. While technology has ushered in numerous advantages, the unchecked spread of malicious behavior and targeted harassment on digital platforms is a dark aspect that needs addressing.
 
 As we reflect on the ordeal faced by Dylan Mortensen and countless others, we're left with an unsettling question: Is this the new norm for society, or will there be a digital reckoning that curbs such virulent behaviors?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The serene town of Moscow, Idaho, woke up to a chilling tragedy on 13 November 2022. Four young lives, all students of the University of Idaho, were snuffed out at an off-campus residence. The grisly nature of the incident, coupled with the media frenzy surrounding it, cast a pall of fear over Moscow, prompting many to depart for the Thanksgiving holidays earlier than planned.

Following extensive investigations, the spotlight turned to Bryan Kohberger, a 28-year-old criminology doctoral student at Washington State University. The site of his arrest added another twist to the tale: his parents' abode in Monroe County, Pennsylvania.

The Kohberger Lineage

Bryan's roots trace back to Effort, Pennsylvania. Born to Michael Kohberger Jr. and Maryann Kohberger, he grew up in a home steeped in the values of community service. The Kohbergers were employees of the Pleasant Valley School District — Michael as a maintenance worker and Maryann as a paraprofessional, extending support to students with special educational needs. Interestingly, the school district also served as the backdrop to Bryan's early job as a security guard.

Though younger than his two sisters, Bryan's turbulent past set him apart. At 19, embroiled in drug addiction, he was arrested for stealing his sister's iPhone. This blot on his record was, however, erased by the "Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition" program, shielding him from any lasting public censure.

“You never expect someone from such a hardworking, dedicated family to go astray,” remarked a local resident.

Repercussions of the Idaho Murders

The aftermath of the Idaho murders saw the Kohbergers grappling with a torrent of emotions. Michael Kohberger Jr.'s journey to Spokane, Washington, to stand by his son during the tumultuous drive back to Pennsylvania was particularly poignant. Their ride, in the white Hyundai Elantra — an unsettling reminder of the crime scene — was marred by two run-ins with the law for speeding and tailgating.

The arrest, which possibly occurred in the parents' absence, came as a body blow to the family. Struggling to reconcile with the grim reality, the Kohbergers stood resolute in their belief: Bryan was innocent. This sentiment echoed in the family's letter, which voiced their grief over the student deaths and pledged unwavering support for Bryan. Yet, the conspicuous absence of one sister's endorsement on this statement raised several eyebrows.

The Fallout

The tremors of Bryan’s arrest sent shockwaves through his immediate family. Distanced from their brother, his sisters have avoided visits to the Latah County Jail. The episode also dealt a blow to their careers, with both reportedly being let go from their jobs.

Michael and Maryann Kohberger, already strained under past financial burdens evident from their two Chapter 7 bankruptcy filings, now find themselves ensnared in further legal complications. Their testimonies have been sought in the mysterious case of a Pennsylvania woman’s disappearance and subsequent death.

Shadows of the Past

Peeling back the layers, one discerns a complex relationship between Bryan and his parents, particularly his mother. A former classmate's words stand testament to Maryann's nurturing nature, painting her as "the most warm-hearted, kind individual". Yet, this warmth seemingly failed to envelop her son, who, plagued by aggression and social challenges, remained somewhat distant. The very mother, a staunch Democrat with strong convictions against abortion and the death penalty, faced a heart-wrenching paradox with her son's alleged actions.

The family's earlier financial struggles, marked by their bankruptcy filings, might also shed light on potential pressures Bryan faced, although direct correlations remain speculative.

"It's always the quiet, unsuspecting towns where such intricate stories unfold," mused a Moscow local, summarizing the sentiments of many.

In Conclusion

The tale of Bryan Kohberger serves as a grim reminder that the undercurrents of human psychology are often intricate and unfathomable. As this story continues to unfold, one thing remains clear: it's essential to approach such cases with empathy, acknowledging the myriad influences and pressures that might push individuals down unforeseen paths.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the age of viral conspiracy theories and internet-driven narratives, the line between villains and victims is increasingly being blurred. The latest episode of "Hidden Killers" podcast, hosted by Tony Brueski, featuring a candid conversation with forensic psychologist, Kate Wallinga, delved deep into this perplexing issue.
 
 In the podcast, Brueski broached the controversial topic of individuals who target and harass victims of crimes, or their families, insinuating that they played a role in the crime itself. The discussion revolved around Bryan Kohberger, and the victim, Dylan Mortensen, one of the surviving roommates from an unidentified case. The release of a new book about this case has intensified public interest and speculation.
 
 Wallinga offered insight into the mindset of those who thrive on propagating conspiracy theories or who rush to cast blame on victims. "We like to feel smart... I saw it first, therefore I'm the smartest," she explained, drawing a parallel to the popular quiz show 'Jeopardy' where only the first person to answer correctly is recognized, even if others knew the answer too.
 
 She cited the 2004 Halloween Napa Valley murders of three women as an example, underscoring the pitfalls of baseless speculation. In this case, the perpetrator turned out to be the husband of a close friend of the victims. At the time, conspiracy theories were not as prevalent due to the relative infancy of internet culture. Yet, Wallinga noted that, had the crime occurred in today's hyper-connected age, a flood of online theories and speculations would have emerged, some potentially targeting innocent parties.
 
 Drawing another parallel, Wallinga mentioned the horrific Sandy Hook massacre. She pointed out the alarming trend of individuals harassing the grieving parents, spurred on by conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones. "They seem to forget that some of the people they're pointing their finger at, that 99.9 percent of the population views as a victim... are actual human beings who've already been through hell," Wallinga lamented.
 
 Wallinga suggests this behavior can be rooted in our need to "feel smart" and our inherent desire to be the first to know or decipher a situation. This drive, when combined with the digital disconnection the internet sometimes fosters, can lead individuals to forget the humanity of those they target.
 
 The conversation took an even more personal turn when Wallinga shared her own experiences. As a forensic psychologist who has interacted with several high-profile criminals, she's familiar with the dark allure of crime and the public's insatiable curiosity. She admitted to deliberately keeping her podcasting identity separate from her professional name to avoid potential backlash or harassment.
 
 Despite this precaution, Wallinga's core belief remains that everyone — criminal or victim — deserves to be seen as a human first. "I wanted to remember the humanity of these inmates... You're a human being too. And we all know you for the worst thing you ever did," she stated.
 
 Towards the end of their discussion, Brueski and Wallinga touched upon the modern obsession with "murder tourism" and the depersonalization of victims, pointing out the disturbing trend of individuals seeking fame or notoriety from tragedies.
 
 Concluding their conversation on a poignant note, Wallinga reiterated the importance of recognizing the humanity in every individual, regardless of the worst actions they might have committed or the tragedies they've endured.
 
 In our age of instant information and rapid judgments, the conversation raises an essential question: Are we, as a society, becoming so obsessed with being "right" that we're losing our ability to empathize with those who've experienced the worst life has to offer?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Why do certain individuals, who seem to be on the path of achievement, suddenly descend into the abyss of crime? This perplexing question echoed throughout a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, hosted by Tony Brueski, featuring insights from J. Ruben Appleman, the author of "While Idaho Slept." Their exploration focused on Bryan Kohberger, a man with a multifaceted persona who, despite his achievements, now stands accused of heinous crimes.
 
 Bryan Kohberger's story is riddled with paradoxes. On one hand, he was a criminology student, poised to make a mark in the realm of criminal justice. On the other, his arrest paints a vastly different narrative. Brueski voiced the common sentiment: "It seemed rather odd that someone would throw away all of that education… on something like this." Appleman, however, walked a fine line, neither endorsing nor contesting Kohberger's guilt. He emphasized that while the police firmly believe in Kohberger’s culpability, his own book doesn't claim Kohberger’s guilt.
 
 Delving deeper, we find a resilient Kohberger who overcame substantial personal hurdles. He "kicked heroin, lost a hundred pounds as a teenager", and took bold strides in higher education. His physical achievements were undeniable. Appleman remarked, "He became a runner. He was studying kickboxing for a little bit. He was in very good shape." But, appearances can deceive.
 
 Despite his accomplishments, Kohberger's interactions, especially with women, were marred by narratives of rage, mistrust, and rejection. A recurring theme in the discourse was the potential influence of "incel" ideologies—those of the "involuntarily celibate." While Brueski contemplated if Kohberger's underlying issues stemmed from this line of thought, Appleman demarcated between merely having incel-like ideologies and identifying as an incel. Appleman stated clearly, "It’s very clear that he had lots of friction between himself and women.”
 
 This friction, combined with personal trauma, societal judgments, and a rare visual impairment called "visual snow," which alters one's perception, created a volatile mix. Brueski, reflecting on societal quick judgments based on isolated moments, stated, "Everybody looks like a creep in some pictures." It's evident that Kohberger, a man in his prime, grappled with the weight of consistent societal denigration. "All he got was rejection and shame and rejection and shame," Appleman mused.
 
 The duo's conversation painted Kohberger not merely as a defendant but as a case study on the intersection of personal experiences, societal norms, and the intricacies of the human mind. As Kohberger faced his trial, the wear of confinement starkly contrasted with his previous fit image. This decline, Brueski and Appleman highlighted, began long before the allegations.
 
 In a world where the tangible often overshadows the intangible, and where societal verdicts are passed on mere appearances, Kohberger's case serves as a mirror to society's hasty judgments and the underlying complexities of the human psyche. Brueski and Appleman's discourse emphasized the need to view individuals not just through the prism of their actions but to delve deeper into the socio-psychological factors that influence their behaviors.
 
 The "Hidden Killers" podcast episode culminated as a reflection on the profound impacts of societal judgment, human complexities, and the tragic outcomes when these forces intersect. Yet, the question lingers: "In a world dominated by perceptions, how can we discern the true essence beneath the facade?"
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can one's dark and tumultuous journey in life lead them to commit the most heinous of crimes?
This week, Tony Brueski's riveting "Hidden Killers" podcast delved into the chilling case of Bryan Kohberger, with guest J. Ruben Appleman, author of "While Idaho Slept." The conversation centered on the brutal murders of four students, allegedly by Kohberger, stirring questions on whether it was a premeditated act, a sudden eruption of rage, or something even more unsettling.
 
 In the podcast, Brueski questions the nature of Kohberger's intentions, “Do you think this was something that was planned out for quite some time? … Had he been stalking these girls?” An analysis of the evidence paints a murky picture. While police have noted Kohberger's vehicle presence near the crime scene on several occasions, it's unclear if he was actively tracking his victims or merely nurturing sinister thoughts.
 
 Appleman, offering a unique perspective from his private investigative background, highlighted the suspicious behavior of someone repeatedly driving in residential areas during odd hours. “Anybody who's out at 3 a.m. is really up to no good,” he remarked.
 
 However, the enigma deepens as evidence suggests that while Kohberger might have been present at the crime scene, his vehicle was surprisingly void of any DNA traces from the victims, despite the brutality of the act. This raises the question: did he meticulously plan the cleanup or was he adequately covered to prevent contamination?
 
 The podcast delves further into Kohberger’s psyche, referencing his online activities. Shockingly, he had allegedly conducted surveys on Reddit, asking criminals about their emotions during the commission of heinous acts. These inquiries, as per Appleman, seemed to stem from an internal struggle, possibly linked to Kohberger's 'visual snow' condition – a disorder that impacted his ability to feel emotions.
 
 The gravity of the murders aside, Appleman touches on a less-discussed aspect of such perpetrators – their own tragic transformation. Once a child, Bryan Kohberger’s journey from an innocent toddler to an individual possibly capable of such horror is heart-wrenching. “Bryan Kohberger was just a kid like everybody else when he started off in this life,” Appleman states, highlighting the tragedy not just of the victims, but the assailant's own descent into darkness.
 
 While the conversation serves to shed light on the chilling actions of one individual, it also underscores the profound complexities and possible triggers that might lead someone down such a dark path.
 
If a person's upbringing and internal struggles can culminate in such devastating actions, how can society better identify and address these issues before they escalate to such horrific outcomes?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delves into a captivating and haunting criminal case that has gripped Moscow, Idaho since November of 2022. The alleged crime? Bryan Kohberger is accused of the first-degree murder of four college students. A tragedy that has left the community and the nation at large shaken and desperately searching for answers.
 
 Brueski's guest on the episode was J. Ruben Appleman, author of the book "While Idaho Slept," which seeks to shed light on the events leading up to and after the chilling crimes. The book's name itself - an evident nod to the quietude of the rural state - reflects the unexpected darkness that emerged from a sleepy university town. Yet, as Appleman points out, his intention was not to sensationalize but to seek understanding.
 
 "Why? Why? While Idaho slept," Brueski began, pointing out Appleman's dedication to the case. Appleman's involvement was not born out of a fascination with true crime, but a deeper emotional connection. He recounted his first book, "The Kill Jar," which centered around the unsolved abduction and murder of four children in his hometown, Detroit, Michigan. Drawing parallels, Appleman admitted that while he doesn't chase after crime stories, he is drawn to those that strike a chord within him.
 
 "The first book I wrote, 'The Kill Jar'... I spent 10 years researching that case and wrote a book about it because it mattered to me," Appleman shared, emphasizing his deep ties to Idaho, having lived there for almost 25 years.
 
 But Appleman's narrative does more than just uncover the horrifying facts of a crime; it paints a vivid picture of a community shaken by grief and suspicion. His candid portrayal of the criticisms against the Moscow Police Department during the initial investigation provides a gripping account of the unfolding drama. As Appleman passionately defends the local police, he recounts how they navigated the tightrope of public demands for transparency and the practicalities of keeping vital evidence confidential to protect the integrity of the ongoing investigation.
 
 "The press... wanted information. But it's not [the police's] job to give us that information," Appleman stated. He also highlighted the collaborative efforts of Moscow's local police, Idaho state police, and the FBI in handling the sensitive case, debunking the public's perception of incompetence.
 
 Amid the layers of the criminal investigation and public scrutiny, Appleman's dedication to truth-telling, both in his book and in his conversation with Brueski, remains at the forefront. His sincere desire is to serve as a voice for the community, especially when outsiders attempted to co-opt the narrative.
 
 A poignant moment in their discussion came when Appleman acknowledged the East and West Coast media who descended on Moscow, standing out like "a sore thumb." His approach was starkly different - blending in, wearing the same worn-out flannel shirts as the locals, and trying to genuinely understand the pulse of the community.
 
 As the conversation drew to a close, Brueski asked about Appleman's mindset before the arrest of Kohberger. Appleman reminisced about how he had started documenting the incidents with no clear intention of writing a book. It was the pull of the story, the community, and perhaps fate that led him to Harper Collins, who chose him, the local, over numerous other big names in journalism.
 
 As Appleman's account on "Hidden Killers" unveils, the depth and breadth of the case against Bryan Kohberger goes far beyond the crimes he stands accused of. It's a story of a community, its grief, resilience, and search for justice.
 
 Yet, as we step back, one lingering question remains: How well do we truly know the places we call home?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The human psyche has always intrigued us, whether through the intricate world of crime or our personal relationships. A recent discussion on the Hidden Killers Podcast with Tony Brueski explored the hidden facets of this very psyche, centering on Bryan Kohberger, the subject of J. Ruben Appleman's new book "While Idaho Slept."
 
Kohberger, as the ongoing investigation reveals, stands accused of committing crimes so heinous that his very family seems to have distanced themselves from him. But what can be discerned about his parents and their relationship with their troubled son?
 
 Brueski probes, "I'm curious to get your thoughts on his parents... we're talking almost a year since these crimes took place. And as far as we know, there's been no record of them going to see their son." This suggests a fraught family dynamic where even the bond between parent and child seems strained, if not altogether broken. Previous incidents have further strained this relationship, such as Kohberger's theft of his sister's cell phone, leading to a confrontation with the law.
 
 Appleman, who has dived deep into the family's history for his book, notes the complex landscape of emotions: "Bryan Kohberger's parents love this guy tremendously... and that they believe him to be very troubled." Despite his actions and accusations, it seems the underlying love remains intact. Yet, the heartbreak over the possibility of his guilt might be too much for them to bear, leading to their physical and emotional distance.
 
 Appleman continues, shedding light on their financial constraints: "I also know they're more or less not situated financially to just kind of jet across the country whenever." But, as he rightly points out, in today's interconnected world, "all they'd have to do is throw up a go fund me and say, we want to visit our son and they'd probably get 10 grand sent their way in two days."
 
 But beyond the dynamics of the Kohberger family, Appleman's book delves deeper into the fabric of communities scarred by violence. It isn't just a chronicle of a crime; it's a meditation on its reverberations. He remarks, "I didn't want to tell the story of a prosecution. I wanted to tell the story of how communities repair themselves after the visitation of violence."
 
 His intention is clear – not merely to regale readers with a gripping tale but to offer a more profound reflection on trauma, loss, and healing. Appleman's hope is that his readers, upon turning the last page, are inspired to "live better... appreciate the loved ones around you more actively."
 
 In an era where true crime dominates our cultural conversations, the conversation on Hidden Killers Podcast and Appleman's book, "While Idaho Slept," invites us to look beyond the horror. To seek understanding, context, and, most crucially, healing. After all, when faced with the shadows, what lengths will a family go to protect its own? And can the fabric of a community, once torn, ever truly be mended?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Last Thursday, Bryan Kohberger made a consequential appearance in an Idaho courtroom. His defense team ardently argued for the dismissal of the indictment that accused him of a heinous quadruple homicide or, alternatively, for the case to be transferred to a lower court for a preliminary evaluation. Interestingly, while one hearing was open to the curious eyes of the public, another was shrouded in secrecy. A guilty verdict tied to the deaths of Maddie Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Ethan Chapin, and Xana Kernodle, which happened nearly a year ago, could have seen Kohberger staring down the grim possibility of a death penalty.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a significant legal development, Judge John Judge has denied the motion to dismiss murder charges against Bryan Kohberger, a 28-year-old criminology PhD student accused of murdering four University of Idaho students. The defense had argued for dismissal, citing grand jury bias, inadmissible evidence, and prosecutorial misconduct, but the judge deemed these arguments unconvincing.

 Kohberger is facing four counts of murder and one count of felony burglary in connection with the tragic stabbing deaths of four young students. The case has drawn widespread attention and public interest.
 
 Adding to the controversy, Judge Judge made a surprising decision to allow cameras in the courtroom, despite opposition from both the defense and the prosecution. This ruling has sparked debate among legal teams and the victims' families, with some advocating for transparency and others expressing concerns about the potential impact of cameras on the trial.
 
 The decision to proceed with the trial and allow cameras in the courtroom sets the stage for a high-profile legal battle that will continue to capture the nation's attention. The case highlights the delicate balance between transparency and the potential influence of media coverage on legal proceedings. As the trial moves forward, all eyes will be on the courtroom drama that unfolds in this closely watched case.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Could a judge's subtle reactions and a courtroom filled with cameras hold the key to understanding the complex legal battle surrounding Bryan Kohberger, the defendant in a high-profile murder case? This question lingered in the air as Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, sat down with Shavaun Scott, a renowned psychotherapist and author, to dissect the recent developments in Kohberger’s court proceedings.
 
 The conversation kicked off with Brueski expressing his intrigue over the judge's reaction to Kohberger's motion for dismissal, describing it as both unexpected and revealing. "Very creative. I think that said a lot right there," Brueski noted, capturing the uniqueness of the moment. Scott chimed in, agreeing that the judge's response was no surprise but highlighting the varied nature of judges and their courtroom demeanors. "Some of them are very stoic and very proper, and some of them really leak a lot of emotion," Scott observed, suggesting that this particular judge’s reactions were transparent and aligned with public sentiment.
 
 However, Scott raised a critical point about the potential implications of a judge displaying their emotions in such a high-stakes trial, questioning whether it was appropriate, despite being entertaining for viewers. The conversation shifted to the contentious issue of cameras in the courtroom, a topic that has sparked debate on all sides. Both the defense and prosecution had requested the removal of cameras, while the families of the victims and the general public leaned toward transparency and access. The judge decided to keep the cameras but promised to maintain control over their presence.
 
 Scott provided insight into why both parties might prefer the absence of cameras, citing Kohberger’s unusual reactions and the additional pressure it places on the prosecution. Brueski then steered the conversation towards Kohberger's early writings, in which he expressed feelings of disconnection and visual disturbances. Scott labeled these as red flags and emphasized the importance of early intervention, though she noted that Kohberger's trajectory suggested that the necessary help was not provided.
 
 As the discussion delved deeper into Kohberger's personality, Scott highlighted his grandiosity, arrogance, and lack of empathy—traits commonly associated with serial killers. She underscored the difficulty individuals like Kohberger would have in maintaining intimate relationships, pointing out that his issues went far beyond simple social awkwardness.
 
 In a thought-provoking turn, Brueski proposed a theory linking Kohberger’s alleged crimes to a twisted desire for attention from women, something he struggled to obtain in his everyday life. Scott found the theory intriguing but speculated that Kohberger may not have thought that far ahead, suggesting that his primary motive was likely the release of rage. She did, however, acknowledge the eerie phenomenon of female fan clubs that emerge around high-profile criminals, adding another layer of complexity to the case.
 
 The podcast left listeners with a chilling contemplation: Could Kohberger's alleged heinous acts be a convoluted attempt to gain attention and acceptance in a world where he felt rejected and misunderstood? Was this a case of a deeply troubled individual lashing out in the most violent way possible, or was there a darker, more calculated motive at play? These questions linger, as the legal proceedings continue to unfold, keeping the public and experts alike fixated on the courtroom drama and
the enigmatic figure at its center.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is the battle over DNA evidence in the Bryan Kohberger case a pivotal moment for justice or a potential loophole for defense? This intriguing question sets the stage for our discussion with Lori Hellis, a former defense attorney and author, on the latest episode of "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski.
 
In a case as complex and high-profile as Bryan Kohberger’s, every piece of evidence, every legal motion, and every argument in court comes under intense scrutiny. The recent debate about access to genetic genealogy and DNA evidence has raised eyebrows and posed critical questions about the prosecution’s methods and the defense’s rights.
 
 Hellis explains that while the defense does have access to the DNA evidence, what they are really after is an understanding of how the genetic genealogy led the prosecution to Kohberger, eventually linking him to his parent's house in Pennsylvania and leading to his arrest. "They want to know how the sausage is made,” Hellis puts it succinctly, emphasizing the infancy of the field of genetic genealogy and the uncharted territory the case is navigating.
 
 In a world where commercial DNA databases have agreements in place to protect user information from law enforcement, there lies a significant challenge for the defense. They want to ensure that these databases were not misused in obtaining evidence against Kohberger. Hellis remarks, “It's a little bit difficult for them to be certain that those databases weren't misused unless they get the raw data of where these database connections were made.”
 
 Hellis anticipates that judges will increasingly require the prosecution to provide detailed information on how they connected the dots using genetic genealogy. This move towards transparency is not only expected but necessary, as it ensures that both parties are playing fair and that the evidence brought forth is obtained legally and ethically.
 
 But what is at stake for the defense? Hellis outlines a clear goal: to prove that the evidence was obtained in a way that violated Kohberger’s rights, making it inadmissible in court. She likens it to an illegal search, emphasizing the importance of the Fourth Amendment in protecting citizens' rights against unlawful searches and seizures.
 
 If the defense is successful in proving that the evidence was obtained illegally, it could deal a significant blow to the prosecution’s case. However, Hellis argues that while it would weaken the case, it may not be fatal. There are other pieces of evidence and indications of probable cause that could potentially underpin Kohberger’s arrest and the subsequent search of his parent's home.
 
 Hellis’s insights highlight a critical aspect of the legal system: the importance of transparency, legality, and ethical conduct in the pursuit of justice. She points out that while the government has nearly unlimited resources, the defendant often does not, underscoring the necessity for both parties to play fair and observe the rules.
 
 As our discussion with Lori Hellis comes to a close, we are left with another intriguing question: How will the fight over DNA evidence and genetic genealogy impact the Bryan Kohberger case, and what does it mean for the future of legal proceedings in such complex and high-profile cases? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the legal community and the public will be watching closely, ensuring that justice is served, and rights are protected.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    
 This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    
 Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.

 Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can the courtroom demeanor of an accused sway public perception and the course of a trial? This is one of the many questions arising from the recent court appearance of Bryan Kohberger, the man accused of a gruesome crime that captured the nation's attention. Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer shared her insights with Tony Brueski on the podcast "Hidden Killers," providing a deep dive into the complexities of the case and the potential implications of Kohberger's newfound courtroom confidence.
 
 Kohberger, as Coffindaffer described, presented a starkly different image during his recent court proceedings—a transformation noted by many. "He's looking dapper and he's looking good and he's looking confident," Coffindaffer remarked. His posture, characterized by the 'steepling of the hands,' suggests a level of self-assurance that has piqued the interest of the public and legal analysts alike.
 
 A small yet pivotal legal victory regarding the IgG—genetic genealogy test results—might have contributed to Kohberger's demeanor. As the judge opted to review the evidence before determining what should be disclosed to the defense, discussions have sparked around the ethics and legalities of evidence sharing. "Now, many people are very upset saying, 'Listen, everything the prosecution has, the defense should have in any sort of case,'" Coffindaffer explained.
 
 Drawing an analogy to informant information protocols, Coffindaffer illuminated the reasoning behind selective evidence disclosure. "You only get what the informant said about your client. We're not going to give you what they said about everybody else," she illustrated, drawing parallels to the safeguarding of irrelevant genealogical data from websites like 23andMe or Ancestry in the Kohberger case.
 
 The heart of the debate centers on the DNA evidence linking Kohberger to the crime. The prosecution's approach to obtaining this evidence has come under scrutiny, with the defense likely to probe for any procedural missteps that could invalidate the findings—despite the DNA match being incontrovertible. Coffindaffer seems confident that the judicial system is handling this correctly, saying, "As long as they release the road they took to get that information, it's not an issue."
 
 The magnitude of data involved in this case is staggering, with the defense already wading through over 50 terabytes of information. The addition of genetic genealogy data threatens to complicate the trial further, potentially extending its timeline significantly. Coffindaffer provided perspective on the colossal task at hand, speculating on the possible ramifications: "It's going to be a lot of information for people to go through, so we could just look at the trial being six years down the road now instead of probably three."
 
 In the tactical chess game of courtroom strategy, the defense's focus on the IgG information could indeed backfire. Coffindaffer posed a candid reality, indicating that the DNA evidence is only part of a larger web that led investigators to Kohberger. "They swabbed his cheek with a search warrant. He is the donor of the DNA on the sheath," she stated unequivocally. Despite the DNA's pivotal role, Coffindaffer noted that Kohberger's identification hinged on multiple investigative threads, including vehicle information.
 
 This case, with its nuanced discussion of evidence and the legal process, raises important questions about the intersection of genetics, privacy, and law enforcement. Coffindaffer's commentary underscores a crucial point: While DNA can be a linchpin in modern investigative work, it is the comprehensive synthesis of information that ultimately pieces together the mosaic of a criminal investigation.
 
 As Kohberger's trial continues to unfold, one cannot help but ponder: Will the outcome hinge solely on the DNA evidence, or will it be the synthesis of the multitude of facts and facets presented that determines the final verdict? The answer to this, as with many legal sagas, will only be revealed with time.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can a deeper dive into DNA evidence and body language foretell the fate of a murder suspect? This is the question that unfolded in the latest episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski and trial consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine delve into the complexities surrounding the Bryan Kohberger case.
 
 In a significant ruling, the judge in the Kohberger case rejected the defense's motion to dismiss charges due to minor errors in jury instructions. Yet, what the defense succeeded in obtaining could alter the course of the trial: a thorough examination of the genetic genealogy evidence against Kohberger during discovery. This move prompts Brueski to question, "Is there anything in this that they can take a look at and say, 'yeah, this doesn't really add up the way that you gathered it,' and could it affect the case?"
 
 Constantine's expertise sheds light on the implications of such a strategy. "This genetic genealogy stuff is powerful," she acknowledges, referencing a personal anecdote about the unexpected discovery of a friend's grandson to illustrate its impact. However, she warns of the potential backfire, emphasizing the "slippery slope" Kohberger's defense might find themselves on if they uncover evidence that reinforces the prosecution's case.
 
 Indeed, the defense's approach is audacious, as Constantine credits Kohberger's attorney with leaving "no stone unturned." But this begs the question, at what risk? "It seems like maybe a place you don't want to go shining your flashlight around if you're the defense," Brueski interjects, highlighting the dangers of bringing unwanted evidence to light.
 
 Constantine's insights extend beyond the DNA evidence. Her analysis of Kohberger's body language in recent court appearances reveals a shift in his demeanor. "He's feeling a little more comfortable, isn't he? Seems like it," she observes. Notably, she points out Kohberger's "steeple" gesture—a sign of confidence—which is a departure from his previous courtroom behavior. She interjects, "The higher the steeple, the higher the confidence."
 
 The expert further decodes Kohberger's nonverbal cues, noting a suspicious look "off to the corner of his eye" during the proceedings. This synchronization of physical gestures with the timing of statements can be telling of an individual's internal processes, according to Constantine.
 
 As the conversation progresses, the topic shifts to the ethical boundaries of coaching a defendant on body language. Constantine firmly opposes such practices, stating, "I've never coached... I've done witness prep... but never to the point where [I instruct them], 'when she says this, I want you to do that.'"
 
 The discussion circles back to Kohberger's evolving courtroom presence. Constantine contrasts his initial interactions—avoiding eye contact, a sign of his antisocial tendencies—with his now more assured stance, attributing it to a sense of "getting some wins," which may be boosting his confidence.
 
 While Kohberger's defense might interpret these developments as positive, Brueski remains skeptical, implying that any so-called victories are pyrrhic at best, given the gravity of the accusations.
 
 The episode closes with a poignant reflection by Brueski and Constantine on the weight of evidence and the human element within the justice system. Constantine's years of experience have taught her to be selective about the cases she involves herself in, particularly steering clear of "horrible heinous murder cases" and "child molestation" unless unequivocal evidence of innocence is presented.
 
 So, what does Kohberger's newfound courtroom confidence truly signify? And as the defense peers into the genetic genealogy that led to his arrest, might they uncover their own Pandora's box of irrefutable evidence? These are the questions that "Hidden Killers" leaves its audience contemplating, as the legal battle over Bryan Kohberger's fate continues to unfold.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Could revisiting a crime scene years later alter the course of a high-profile murder trial? This is the crux of a recent debate stirred by the decision to potentially dismantle a crucial piece of evidence: the home on King Road, Moscow, Idaho, where four university students were brutally murdered.
 
 Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani criticized the plan to tear down the home during a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast with host Tony Brueski. "This is evidence in probably the biggest murder case in the country right now," Rahmani argued. "I just don't see the upside of destroying evidence in a case like this."
 
 The FBI has returned to the scene to document and photograph, sparking discussion on the impact that the physical crime scene can have on a jury's perception and understanding of a case. "The FBI's going to recreate it and model it...It just doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Let's at least get through the murder trial, then we can tear it down," Rahmani stated.
 
 The conversation shifted to the power of site visits in a trial. Brueski questioned Rahmani on the difference between jurors viewing a 3D model and visiting the actual location. Rahmani responded emphatically, "It makes it real, no matter what you're describing...It's not the same as being there in person." The former prosecutor advocated for jurors to experience the proximity and layout of the scene where Bryan Kohberger is alleged to have committed the crimes. Such an experience can be invaluable, particularly in a case where spatial relationships and timing are key elements of the prosecution's narrative.
 
 During a site visit, Rahmani explained, jurors aren't merely left to wander; it's a structured event: "It's more of a guided tour." There are no discussions with the lawyers or witnesses directly; the emphasis is on observing the space as it currently exists, not as an active crime scene.
 
 Rahmani noted that the impact of a site visit is typically more favorable for the prosecution. He referenced the recent Nikolas Cruz trial, noting the stark environment of the crime scene had a profound impact, despite the trial's focus being on sentencing rather than guilt.
 
 The use of the crime scene in trials is not new. In the Murdaugh case, jurors reported that visiting the site was influential in their decision-making process. This insight lends support to the idea that the tangible reality of a location can affect a juror’s deliberation significantly.
 
 The conversation also touched on the emotional aspect of crime scenes, particularly when violence was involved. "Most of the time when you're seeing blood, you're seeing evidence of violence... that tends to really sway jurors in favor of the prosecution as opposed to the defense," Rahmani pointed out. This visceral reaction could be a crucial factor in cases where the crime scene is visited by the jury.
 
 This brings the discussion back to the house on King Road. As the trial nears and the decision of whether to preserve the crime scene comes under scrutiny, the debate continues on the best course of action for justice.
 
 As the article concludes, it leaves the reader with another pressing question: With technological advancements offering virtual reconstructions of crime scenes, will physical site visits continue to hold the same weight in the judicial process, or will we see a shift in how evidence is presented and perceived in courtrooms of the future?

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

What if a person's body language could reveal more than their words in the face of overwhelming evidence? This question hovers over the latest episode of "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski discusses the enigmatic courtroom demeanor of Bryan Kohberger with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent and expert in behavioral analysis.
 
 In a riveting conversation, Dreeke decodes the subtleties of Kohberger's behavior, particularly his hand steepling—a gesture often associated with confidence—which struck observers as incongruent with his precarious legal situation. "Having that high steeple... it keeps following the arc of what I have said from the very beginning with him," Dreeke explained. "He's got this aura of I know more than everyone... and he can't believe he got an F because he got caught."
 
 The discussion unfolds around the intricate tapestry of Kohberger's alleged actions and the psychological underpinnings that might explain them. Brueski and Dreeke speculate on the possible motivations driving Kohberger, pondering whether his actions were a bid for a form of recognition that had always eluded him. "But why? Why would one want to do this?" Brueski asks, delving into Kohberger's troubled history with women and social interactions.
 
 Kohberger's courtroom behavior suggests an individual caught in the web of his grandiosity. As Dreeke points out, "That's not what you want to show a jury." He adds, "Having that kind of arrogance and overconfidence, it's, I think, a fatal flaw of his in that courtroom that day."
 
 Their conversation goes deeper, examining a theory that could belong in psychological thrillers: Kohberger's heinous acts could stem from a desperate need for attention, even if it meant attracting it from behind bars—a concept not unheard of but unusual in its application here. "He always has had issues... of not having good relations with women. But very much desiring relationships with women," Brueski muses, building a profile of a man whose actions seem to paint a portrait of deep-seated issues and a craving for notoriety.
 
 The podcast delves into Kohberger's academic past, his study of criminal behavior, and how this may have intersected with his alleged criminal acts. The hosts ponder whether his knowledge and research were used as a twisted framework for his actions. "He studied some of the worst people out there... But one thing that most of those people that are behind bars did get after committing crimes? Women. They got attention from women," Brueski continues, highlighting a paradox that Kohberger might have found himself in.
 
 Dreeke chimes in with expertise, speculating that Kohberger might be finding new stimulus in the attention his case is generating, especially from women—like his defense attorney—which could be fueling his courtroom confidence. "He's transformed the pleasure and emotional stimulus he was getting from the action of planning the murder, doing the murder. And now that he's getting attention, he's utilizing that as his fuel," Dreeke postulates.
 
 The discussion on "Hidden Killers" comes to a close with Brueski and Dreeke questioning the source of Kohberger's courtroom confidence, a confidence seemingly unfounded given the evidence stacking against him. They leave listeners with a chilling question to ponder: "Where is the fuel coming from and why?" This question encapsulates the enigma of Kohberger, inviting audiences to reflect on the nature of criminal confidence and the psychological machinations that drive it. Could it be that Kohberger's actions and his courtroom demeanor are part of a larger, more disturbing narrative, one that we are only beginning to understand?

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com